Literature DB >> 24186237

Effect of kVp on image quality and accuracy in coronary CT angiography according to patient body size: a phantom study.

Sang Min Lee1, Whal Lee, Jin Wook Chung, Eun-Ah Park, Jae Hyung Park.   

Abstract

The aim is to investigate the effect of tube voltage and chest wall thickness on image quality, stenosis measurement, and radiation dose in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in a phantom study. A phantom with tubes in a box at its center and concentric cylindrical plastic chambers of three layers at its periphery was constructed. The concentric cylinders were filled with oil or left empty to simulate different degrees of obesity. Retrospective CT scanning was performed at different kVps and mAs. Image noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), stenosis measurement, and radiation dose were obtained. A CNR higher than 10 was considered to be acceptable for clinical practice. Mean image noise was 51.7 at 80 kVp, 31.6 at 100 kVp, and 24.7 at 120 kVp (P < 0.001). A CNR greater than 10 could be achieved with all the images using 80 kVp as well as using 100 or 120 kVp. However, CNRs at 100 and 120 kVp were significantly higher than the CNR at 80 kVp (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between 100 and 120 kVp. All stenosis measurements were overestimated. Accuracy of stenosis measurement was significantly correlated with CNR (P < 0.05), but not with kVps. Mean doses were 2.07 mSv at 80 kVp, 3.37 mSv at 100 kVp, and 5.17 mSv at 120 kVp (P < 0.001). CNR per radiation dose was highest at 80 kVp, regardless of chest wall thickness. For CCTA, using 80 kVp with high mAs is the best choice, regardless of chest wall thickness, for minimal radiation dose and sufficient image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24186237     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0298-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  28 in total

1.  The impact of cardiology on the collective effective dose in the North of England.

Authors:  D A Broadhead; C L Chapple; K Faulkner; M L Davies; H McCallum
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography.

Authors:  Thomas K Nishino; Xizeng Wu; Raleigh F Johnson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Jiang Hsieh; John Londt; Melissa Vass; Jay Li; Xiangyang Tang; Darin Okerlund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography.

Authors:  Duncan R Coles; Mary A Smail; Ian S Negus; Peter Wilde; Martin Oberhoff; Karl R Karsch; Andreas Baumbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study.

Authors:  Sanjeeva P Kalva; Dushyant V Sahani; Peter F Hahn; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Body-mass index and mortality in Korean men and women.

Authors:  Sun Ha Jee; Jae Woong Sull; Jungyong Park; Sang-Yi Lee; Heechoul Ohrr; Eliseo Guallar; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Ulrike Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Katharina Anders; Tobias Pflederer; Sei Komatsu; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Dieter Ropers
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03

8.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexander W Leber; Andreas Knez; Alexander Becker; Christoph Becker; Franz von Ziegler; Konstantin Nikolaou; Carsten Rist; Maximilian Reiser; Carl White; Gerhard Steinbeck; Peter Boekstegers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja Meyer; Martin Hadamitzky; Ester Huber; Maria Zankl; Stefan Martinoff; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Optimization of the scan protocol for the reduction of diaphragmatic motion artifacts depicted on CT angiography: a phantom study simulating pediatric patients with free breathing.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Baek; Whal Lee; Kee-Hyun Chang; Jin Wook Chung; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  4 in total

1.  Individually tailored contrast enhancement in CT pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Babs M F Hendriks; Madeleine Kok; Casper Mihl; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Coronary CT Angiography: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Jiahui Liao; Lanfang Huang; Meizi Qu; Binghui Chen; Guojie Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  High-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with low contrast medium volume: comparison of 80 and 100 kVp high-pitch protocols.

Authors:  Long Jiang Zhang; Li Qi; Carlo N De Cecco; Chang Sheng Zhou; James V Spearman; U Joseph Schoepf; Guang Ming Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Evaluation of computed tomography settings in the context of visualization and discrimination of low dose injections of a novel liquid soft tissue fiducial marker in head and neck imaging.

Authors:  David Steybe; Philipp Poxleitner; Pit Jacob Voss; Marc Christian Metzger; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Fabian Bamberg; Suam Kim; Maximilian Frederik Russe
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 1.930

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.