Maria E Bleil1, Steven E Gregorich2, Nancy E Adler3, Barbara Sternfeld4, Mitchell P Rosen5, Marcelle I Cedars5. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: maria.bleil@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 4. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California. 5. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reproductive age, as indexed by a validated marker of ovarian reserve (antimüllerian hormone [AMH]), varies among women of different race/ethnic backgrounds. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community-based sample. PATIENT(S): Multiethnic sample of 947 (277 white, 237 African American, 220 Latina, and 213 Chinese) healthy and regularly cycling premenopausal women, ages 25-45. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AMH level. RESULT(S): A multivariate model was fit examining race/ethnicity, covariates, nonlinear terms for age (age(2), age(3)), and body mass index (BMI(2), BMI(3)), and two-way interactions between race/ethnicity and each of the other predictor variables in relation to AMH. After backward elimination, significant effects included race/ethnicity (F = 8.45), age (F = 349.94), race/ethnicity-by-linear age interaction (F = 4.67), age(2) (F = 31.61), and BMI (F = 10.69). Inspection of the significant race/ethnicity-by-linear age interaction showed AMH levels were consistently lower among Latina women compared with white women across all ages, whereas AMH levels were lower among African American and Chinese women compared with the white women at younger and middle ages, respectively. The AMH levels were higher among African American compared with Latina and Chinese women at older ages. CONCLUSION(S): Although the results must be considered preliminary, the findings are twofold: African American women may have lower AMH levels at younger ages but experience less of a reduction in AMH with advancing age, and Latina and Chinese women compared with white women may have lower AMH levels, marking a lower ovarian reserve and a possibly increased risk for earlier menopause.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reproductive age, as indexed by a validated marker of ovarian reserve (antimüllerian hormone [AMH]), varies among women of different race/ethnic backgrounds. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community-based sample. PATIENT(S): Multiethnic sample of 947 (277 white, 237 African American, 220 Latina, and 213 Chinese) healthy and regularly cycling premenopausal women, ages 25-45. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AMH level. RESULT(S): A multivariate model was fit examining race/ethnicity, covariates, nonlinear terms for age (age(2), age(3)), and body mass index (BMI(2), BMI(3)), and two-way interactions between race/ethnicity and each of the other predictor variables in relation to AMH. After backward elimination, significant effects included race/ethnicity (F = 8.45), age (F = 349.94), race/ethnicity-by-linear age interaction (F = 4.67), age(2) (F = 31.61), and BMI (F = 10.69). Inspection of the significant race/ethnicity-by-linear age interaction showed AMH levels were consistently lower among Latina women compared with white women across all ages, whereas AMH levels were lower among African American and Chinese women compared with the white women at younger and middle ages, respectively. The AMH levels were higher among African American compared with Latina and Chinese women at older ages. CONCLUSION(S): Although the results must be considered preliminary, the findings are twofold: African American women may have lower AMH levels at younger ages but experience less of a reduction in AMH with advancing age, and Latina and Chinese women compared with white women may have lower AMH levels, marking a lower ovarian reserve and a possibly increased risk for earlier menopause.
Authors: E B Gold; J Bromberger; S Crawford; S Samuels; G A Greendale; S D Harlow; J Skurnick Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Steven E Gregorich; Daniel McConnell; Mitchell P Rosen; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Menopause Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Catherine Kim; James C Slaughter; Erica T Wang; Duke Appiah; Pamela Schreiner; Benjamin Leader; Ronit Calderon-Margalit; Barbara Sternfeld; David Siscovick; Melissa Wellons Journal: Maturitas Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Bradley M Appelhans; Melissa D Latham; Michelle A Irving; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Lia A Bernardi; Mercedes R Carnethon; Peter J de Chavez; Deborah E Ikhena; Lisa M Neff; Donna D Baird; Erica E Marsh Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Seungyoun Jung; Naomi Allen; Alan A Arslan; Laura Baglietto; Louise A Brinton; Brian L Egleston; Roni Falk; Renée T Fortner; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Annika Idahl; Rudolph Kaaks; Eva Lundin; Melissa Merritt; Charlotte Onland-Moret; Sabina Rinaldi; María-José Sánchez; Sabina Sieri; Helena Schock; Xiao-Ou Shu; Patrick M Sluss; Paul N Staats; Ruth C Travis; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Shelley Tworoger; Kala Visvanathan; Vittorio Krogh; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Wei Zheng; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Andrea R S Mont'Alverne; Lucas Y S Yamakami; Célio R Gonçalves; Edmund C Baracat; Eloisa Bonfá; Clovis A Silva Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Erica E Marsh; Lia A Bernardi; Marissa L Steinberg; Peter J de Chavez; Jenny A Visser; Mercedes R Carnethon; Donna D Baird Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-04-23 Impact factor: 7.329