Maria E Bleil1, Steven E Gregorich, Daniel McConnell, Mitchell P Rosen, Marcelle I Cedars. 1. From the Departments of 1Psychiatry and 2Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and 4Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The menopausal transition is associated with an increase in risk for cardiovascular disease; however, whether variability in reproductive aging relates to cardiovascular risk factors in the premenopausal period has not been studied. METHODS: In a multiethnic sample of 951 healthy, regularly cycling women aged 25 to 45 years (mean [SD] age, 35.2 [5.5] y), we examined antimüllerian hormone (AMH), a validated marker of ovarian reserve, in relation to the overall number of cardiometabolic risk factors, calculated as the sum of the five components of metabolic syndrome (triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein <50 mg/dL; homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance ≥2.6; waist circumference equal to or higher than race-specific cutoff; and hypertensive [vs normotensive] status), and in relation to each of these risk factors individually. RESULTS: In age-adjusted models, results showed that the number of cardiometabolic risk factors was 52.1% higher among women with low versus high AMH levels and 46.0% higher among women with mid versus high AMH levels. In addition, results showed that low and mid levels of AMH (vs high) were associated with an increase in risk with respect to high-density lipoprotein (odds ratio [OR], 1.814; 95% CI, 1.211-2.718 and OR, 1.568; 95% CI, 1.083-2.269, respectively), waist circumference (OR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.380-2.934 and OR, 1.881; 95% CI, 1.333-2.654, respectively), and hypertensive status (OR, 2.373; 95% CI, 1.095-5.143 and OR, 2.052; 95% CI, 0.976-4.314, respectively) outcomes. Associations, however, attenuated when body mass index was covaried (Ps > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional evidence suggests that having a greater ovarian reserve is associated with having a healthier cardiometabolic risk factor profile. Future longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether this association may be mediated by body mass index.
OBJECTIVE: The menopausal transition is associated with an increase in risk for cardiovascular disease; however, whether variability in reproductive aging relates to cardiovascular risk factors in the premenopausal period has not been studied. METHODS: In a multiethnic sample of 951 healthy, regularly cycling women aged 25 to 45 years (mean [SD] age, 35.2 [5.5] y), we examined antimüllerian hormone (AMH), a validated marker of ovarian reserve, in relation to the overall number of cardiometabolic risk factors, calculated as the sum of the five components of metabolic syndrome (triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein <50 mg/dL; homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance ≥2.6; waist circumference equal to or higher than race-specific cutoff; and hypertensive [vs normotensive] status), and in relation to each of these risk factors individually. RESULTS: In age-adjusted models, results showed that the number of cardiometabolic risk factors was 52.1% higher among women with low versus high AMH levels and 46.0% higher among women with mid versus high AMH levels. In addition, results showed that low and mid levels of AMH (vs high) were associated with an increase in risk with respect to high-density lipoprotein (odds ratio [OR], 1.814; 95% CI, 1.211-2.718 and OR, 1.568; 95% CI, 1.083-2.269, respectively), waist circumference (OR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.380-2.934 and OR, 1.881; 95% CI, 1.333-2.654, respectively), and hypertensive status (OR, 2.373; 95% CI, 1.095-5.143 and OR, 2.052; 95% CI, 0.976-4.314, respectively) outcomes. Associations, however, attenuated when body mass index was covaried (Ps > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional evidence suggests that having a greater ovarian reserve is associated with having a healthier cardiometabolic risk factor profile. Future longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether this association may be mediated by body mass index.
Authors: Oybek Rustamov; Philip W Pemberton; Stephen A Roberts; Alexander Smith; Allen P Yates; Sree D Patchava; Luciano G Nardo Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: S L Broer; M J C Eijkemans; G J Scheffer; I A J van Rooij; A de Vet; A P N Themmen; J S E Laven; F H de Jong; E R Te Velde; B C Fauser; F J M Broekmans Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Anne Z Steiner; Amy H Herring; James S Kesner; Juliana W Meadows; Frank Z Stanczyk; Steven Hoberman; Donna D Baird Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Bradley M Appelhans; Melissa D Latham; Michelle A Irving; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; JoAnn E Manson; Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Anne Z Steiner; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Brian W Whitcomb Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Brian W Whitcomb; Alexandra Purdue-Smithe; Susan E Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson; Bernard A Rosner; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Brian W Whitcomb; Kathleen L Szegda; Maegan E Boutot; JoAnn E Manson; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Lisa M Troy; Karin B Michels; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Alex J Polotsky; Amanda A Allshouse; Sybil L Crawford; Sioban D Harlow; Naila Khalil; Rasa Kazlauskaite; Nanette Santoro; Richard S Legro Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Theresa M Hardy; Mauricio Garnier-Villarreal; Donna O McCarthy; Richard A Anderson; Rebecca M Reynolds Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Julie S Rios; Eleni A Greenwood; Mary Ellen G Pavone; Marcelle I Cedars; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Nanette Santoro; Fangbai Sun; Randal D Robinson; Gregory Christman; Heping Zhang; Heather G Huddleston Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mingfei Zhao; Brian W Whitcomb; Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; JoAnn E Manson; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Brian W Whitcomb; Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Kathleen L Szegda; Maegan E Boutot; Susan E Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson; Bernard Rosner; Walter C Willett; A Heather Eliassen; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897