Literature DB >> 24179104

Evaluation of a computer-guided curriculum using animation, visual images, and voice cues to train patients for peritoneal dialysis.

Judith Bernardini1, Diane J Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Training patients to perform peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home is key to good patient outcomes. Currently, no validated curriculum based on education concepts is available in the public domain, and training is not standardized. Few nurses are prepared to be effective trainers. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of PD training using a new cycler designed with animation, visual images, and voice cues and provided by a qualified PD nurse with a standardized script to guide the trainer. ♢
METHODS: The study recruited 40 participants, including individuals naive to dialysis and current automated PD (APD) patients. Participants with visual, hearing, or touch impairments were purposely included to reflect the disabilities common to the general APD population. The participants encompassed a range of self-reported computer and technical experience and education levels. Experienced training nurses trained each participant, one on one, for 4 - 8 hours during a single day; the nurses followed the standardized script as the participants progressed through the cycler training curriculum. The pace of training was adjusted to meet individual abilities and needs. Participants were evaluated by the training nurse at the end of the training session for their proficiency in meeting the learning objectives. ♢
RESULTS: All 40 participants completed the 1-day training and successfully met all task objectives by the end of the day. Participant ages ranged from 23 to 73 years (mean: 53.8 ± 11 years), with the women (50 ± 12 years) being significantly younger than the men (57 ± 9 years, p = 0.05). Among the participants, 90% had visual impairments; 40%, hearing impairments; and 45%, touch impairments. Twenty-nine participants (73%) had multiple impairments. Median training time was 7 ± 0.13 hours, with a range of 5 - 8.25 hours. We found no correlation between the number of hours needed for successful training and age (r = 0.30). Training time did not differ significantly by sex, disability, computer or technical experience, or education level. The required training time was less for participants with previous PD experience (6.5 ± 0.7 hours) than for those naive to dialysis (7 ± 0.8 h), but at p = 0.056, the difference just missed being statistically significant. ♢
CONCLUSIONS: The most striking finding is that, despite a variety of barriers to learning, all 40 participants were able to meet all the stated objectives of the study with 4 - 8 hours of training. Ability to meet the study objectives was not less for participants with limited education or limited technical or computer experience than for those with more education or more advanced technical and computer skills. Thus, the highly technical aspect of the new cycler is able to promote learning for a wide range of learners. The cycler provides automated instruction using audio, video, and animation, and those features, combined with a qualified training nurse using a standardized script, appear to be both efficient and effective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Curriculum; PD training; animation; computers; visual images; voice guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24179104      PMCID: PMC3923696          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  A simple five-step method for teaching clinical skills.

Authors:  J H George; F X Doto
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Peritoneal dialysis patient training, 2006.

Authors:  Judith Bernardini; Valerie Price; Ana Figueiredo
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  International survey of peritoneal dialysis training programs.

Authors:  Judith Bernardini; Valerie Price; Ana Figueiredo; Aase Riemann; Dora Leung
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Pediatric peritoneal dialysis training: characteristics and impact on peritonitis rates.

Authors:  M Holloway; S Mujais; M Kandert; B A Warady
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  New directions in peritoneal dialysis patient training.

Authors:  Gayle Hall; Amy Bogan; Sandra Dreis; AnnMarie Duffy; Suzanne Greene; Karen Kelley; Holly Lizak; Jose Nabut; Vicky Schinker; Netta Schwartz
Journal:  Nephrol Nurs J       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.959

6.  Influence of peritoneal dialysis training nurses' experience on peritonitis rates.

Authors:  Kai Ming Chow; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Man Ching Law; Janny Suk Fun Fung; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 8.237

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.