Literature DB >> 15114797

New directions in peritoneal dialysis patient training.

Gayle Hall1, Amy Bogan, Sandra Dreis, AnnMarie Duffy, Suzanne Greene, Karen Kelley, Holly Lizak, Jose Nabut, Vicky Schinker, Netta Schwartz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of training methods on selected patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients.
DESIGN: Multi-center, longitudinal prospective quasi-experimental design study conducted over a 2-year period.
SETTING: Thirty-two Gambro Healthcare peritoneal dialysis (PD) home training programs in the United States.
SUBJECTS: New patients starting PD were trained on PD technique and diet using either an adult learning theory-based curriculum in the experimental group (PG) or non-standardized conventional training programs in the control group (CG). Excluded were patients who were non-English speaking, legally blind without sighted caregiver, nursing home residents, and those with previous exposure to PD training.
METHODS: Information was collected by means of manual data collection tools and though the use of Gambro Healthcare computer system and was analyzed for statistical significance by Gambro Healthcare biostatistician.
RESULTS: Compared with the CG, initial training took longer in the PG (PG = 29 hrs; CG = 22.6 hrs; p < .0001), and time required for retraining was less but not statistically significant (PG = 8.7 hrs; CG = 12.5 hrs; p = .1324). The peritonitis rate was less in the PG (28.2 per 1000 patient months) than in the CG (36.7 per 1000 patient months), but did not achieve statistical significance (p = .09783). Exit site infections (ESIs) were less in the PG than the CG (PG = 18.5; CG = 31.8; p = .00349). Dropout from PD to hemodialysis secondary to infection was less in the PG (1.6%) than in the CG (5.6%) (p = .0069). Measured on a scale with 4 being the best score, mean fluid balance scores in the PG were 3.41 compared to 3.25 in the CG (p < .0001), and mean compliance scores for the PG versus the CG were 3.62 and 3.52, respectively (p < .0001). Laboratory parameters between the two groups were significantly different only for Kt/V (PG = 2.4; CG = 2.3; p = 0.0107).
CONCLUSION: Use of the adult learning theory-based training method curriculum was positively associated with improved patient outcomes in the PD population studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15114797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Nurs J        ISSN: 1526-744X            Impact factor:   0.959


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of a computer-guided curriculum using animation, visual images, and voice cues to train patients for peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Judith Bernardini; Diane J Davis
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Peritoneal dialysis associated infections: An update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Jacob A Akoh
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-06

Review 3.  Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update.

Authors:  Bradley A Warady; Sevcan Bakkaloglu; Jason Newland; Michelle Cantwell; Enrico Verrina; Alicia Neu; Vimal Chadha; Hui-Kim Yap; Franz Schaefer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 4.  A contemporary approach to the prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in children: the role of improvement science.

Authors:  Allison Redpath Mahon; Alicia M Neu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Key factors for a high-quality peritoneal dialysis program--the role of the PD team and continuous quality improvement.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Zhaohui Ni; Jiaqi Qian
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Optimizing Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis Prevention in the United States: From Standardized Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis Reporting and Beyond.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Douglas S Fuller; Neil Boudville; Alan S Kliger; Douglas E Schaubel; Isaac Teitelbaum; Bradley A Warady; Alicia M Neu; Priti R Patel; Beth Piraino; Martin Schreiber; Ronald L Pisoni
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Safety of peritoneal dialysis catheter surgery under dexmedetomidine and local anesthesia for elderly patients in Japan: a single-center prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tsugumi Fukunaga; Go Anan; Takuo Hirose; Yuka Miyake; Kento Hoshino; Akari Endo; Ryo Tajima; Hiroki Ito; Shingo Nakayama; Hideaki Hashimoto; Katsuya Ishiyama; Tomoyoshi Kimura; Takefumi Mori
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.801

8.  Peritoneal Dialysis Drop-out: Causes and Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Kunal Chaudhary
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-27

Review 9.  Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization.

Authors:  Judith Van den Bosch; D Simone Warren; Peter A Rutherford
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  The impact of simulation-based teaching on home hemodialysis patient training.

Authors:  Doris T Chan; Rose Faratro; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.