Literature DB >> 24178991

Admission to medical school: International perspectives.

J C Edwards1, E K Johnson, J B Molidor.   

Abstract

Admission to medical school is the goal of many students in many countries. The admission process varies from country to country. In some countries, students compete in an open market to gain a position in medical school. In other countries, "intake" is a more routine, planned beaureaucratic process. Where competition reigns, the interview is an important part of the selection process. The interview has been defined by Bingham and Moore [1] as:A serious conversation directed to a definite purpose other than satisfaction in the conversation itself ... We must recognize that not only spoken words, but other means of face-to-face communication also are used. Inflection, qualities of voice, facial expression, glint of the eye, posture, gestures, and general behavior supplement what is said. They all contribute to the purposeful exchange of meanings which is the interview.Faculty members in medical schools interview patients all the time. This type of interview, however, is different from the admission interview conducted for applicants to medical school. Patient interviews are highly patterned and structured to obtain specific information. Interviews of applicants, on the other hand, usually are more open-ended. The psychology of the two types of interviews differ also. Applicants to medical school, if accepted, will in time become colleagues with their interviewers and will have increasing levels of responsibility and respect. Patients, however, will always be dependent upon the physicians who treat them.In this article, we present basic facts, conclusions, and recommendations from a review of literature about the interview [2]. Results of a survey of admission interviews at Canadian and United Kingdom medical schools are presented for the first time, and comparisons with United States interview practices are drawn. Finally, descriptions of the selection process at several medical schools with problem based learning curricula are provided and comparisons are noted.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24178991     DOI: 10.1007/BF00596226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  13 in total

1.  The critical incident technique.

Authors:  J C FLANAGAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Current practices in admission interviews at U.S. medical schools.

Authors:  E K Johnson; J C Edwards
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Qualitative variables in medical school admission.

Authors:  W C McGaghie
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Impact on admission to a school of medicine of an innovation in selection procedures.

Authors:  E V Calkins; J M Richards; A McCanse; M M Burgess; T L Willoughby
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1974-12

5.  The structured interview: a selection device.

Authors:  M M Burgess; V Calkins; J M Richards
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1972-12

6.  The objective structured interview for medical student selection.

Authors:  D A Powis; R L Neame; T Bristow; L B Murphy
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-12

7.  The decline and rise of the medical school applicant pool.

Authors:  D G Kassebaum; P L Szenas
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Predictive value of selection interviews in success in first-year medicine.

Authors:  M W Ross
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1983-10-29       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Audit of admission to medical school: II--Shortlisting and interviews.

Authors:  I C McManus; P Richards
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-11-10

10.  Subjective and objective admissions factors as predictors of clinical clerkship performance.

Authors:  K E Meredith; M R Dunlap; H H Baker
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1982-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.