Iwan Paolucci1, Marius Schwalbe2, Gian Andrea Prevost3, Anja Lachenmayer3, Daniel Candinas3, Stefan Weber2, Pascale Tinguely3. 1. ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. iwan.paolucci@artorg.unibe.ch. 2. ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 3. Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efficient laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors relies on precise tumor visualization and accurate positioning of ablation probes. This study evaluates positional accuracy and procedural efficiency of a dynamic navigation technique based on electromagnetic-tracked laparoscopic ultrasound (ELUS) for laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors. METHODS: The proposed navigation approach combines intraoperative 2D ELUS-based planning for navigated positioning of ablation probes, with immediate 3D ELUS-based validation of intrahepatic probe position. The environmental influence on electromagnetic-tracking stability was evaluated in the operation room. Accuracy of navigated ablation probe positioning assessed as the target-positioning error (TPE), and procedural efficiency defined as time efforts for target definition/navigated targeting and number of probe repositionings, were evaluated in a laparoscopic model and compared with conventional laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) guidance. RESULTS: The operation-room environment showed interferences < 1 mm on the EM-tracking system. A total of 60 targeting attempts were conducted by three surgeons, with ten targeting attempts using ELUS and ten using conventional LUS each. Median TPE and time for targeting using ELUS and LUS were 4.2 mm (IQR 2.9-5.3 mm) versus 6 mm (IQR 4.7-7.5 mm), and 39 s (IQR 24-47 s) versus 76 s (IQR 47-121 s), respectively (p < 0.01 each). With ELUS, median time for target definition was 48.5 s, with 0 ablation probe repositionings compared to 17 when using LUS. The navigation technique was rated with a mean score of 85.5 on a Standard Usability Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ELUS-based navigation approach allows for accurate and efficient targeting of liver tumors in a laparoscopic model. Focusing on a dynamic and tumor-targeted navigation technique relying on intraoperative imaging, this avoids potential inaccuracies due to organ deformation and yields a user-friendly technique for efficient laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors.
BACKGROUND: Efficient laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors relies on precise tumor visualization and accurate positioning of ablation probes. This study evaluates positional accuracy and procedural efficiency of a dynamic navigation technique based on electromagnetic-tracked laparoscopic ultrasound (ELUS) for laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors. METHODS: The proposed navigation approach combines intraoperative 2D ELUS-based planning for navigated positioning of ablation probes, with immediate 3D ELUS-based validation of intrahepatic probe position. The environmental influence on electromagnetic-tracking stability was evaluated in the operation room. Accuracy of navigated ablation probe positioning assessed as the target-positioning error (TPE), and procedural efficiency defined as time efforts for target definition/navigated targeting and number of probe repositionings, were evaluated in a laparoscopic model and compared with conventional laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) guidance. RESULTS: The operation-room environment showed interferences < 1 mm on the EM-tracking system. A total of 60 targeting attempts were conducted by three surgeons, with ten targeting attempts using ELUS and ten using conventional LUS each. Median TPE and time for targeting using ELUS and LUS were 4.2 mm (IQR 2.9-5.3 mm) versus 6 mm (IQR 4.7-7.5 mm), and 39 s (IQR 24-47 s) versus 76 s (IQR 47-121 s), respectively (p < 0.01 each). With ELUS, median time for target definition was 48.5 s, with 0 ablation probe repositionings compared to 17 when using LUS. The navigation technique was rated with a mean score of 85.5 on a Standard Usability Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ELUS-based navigation approach allows for accurate and efficient targeting of liver tumors in a laparoscopic model. Focusing on a dynamic and tumor-targeted navigation technique relying on intraoperative imaging, this avoids potential inaccuracies due to organ deformation and yields a user-friendly technique for efficient laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors.
Authors: M Claudon; D Cosgrove; T Albrecht; L Bolondi; M Bosio; F Calliada; J-M Correas; K Darge; C Dietrich; M D'Onofrio; D H Evans; C Filice; L Greiner; K Jäger; N de Jong; E Leen; R Lencioni; D Lindsell; A Martegani; S Meairs; C Nolsøe; F Piscaglia; P Ricci; G Seidel; B Skjoldbye; L Solbiati; L Thorelius; F Tranquart; H P Weskott; T Whittingham Journal: Ultraschall Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 6.548
Authors: O V Solberg; T Langø; G A Tangen; R Mårvik; B Ystgaard; A Rethy; T A N Hernes Journal: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.442
Authors: Jennie Engstrand; Grzegorz Toporek; Piotr Harbut; Eduard Jonas; Henrik Nilsson; Jacob Freedman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Vanessa M Banz; Matthias Baechtold; Stefan Weber; Matthias Peterhans; Daniel Inderbitzin; Daniel Candinas Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Ryan T Groeschl; Charles H C Pilgrim; Erin M Hanna; Kerri A Simo; Ryan Z Swan; David Sindram; John B Martinie; David A Iannitti; Mark Bloomston; Carl Schmidt; Hooman Khabiri; Lawrence A Shirley; Robert C G Martin; Susan Tsai; Kiran K Turaga; Kathleen K Christians; William S Rilling; T Clark Gamblin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Riccardo Lencioni; Thierry de Baere; Robert C Martin; Charles W Nutting; Govindarajan Narayanan Journal: Liver Cancer Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 11.740
Authors: P Hildebrand; S Schlichting; V Martens; A Besirevic; M Kleemann; U Roblick; L Mirow; C Bürk; A Schweikard; H-P Bruch Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Stephen Hinds; Herman Alexander Jaeger; Richard Burke; Brodie O'Sullivan; Joseph Keane; Fabian Trauzettel; Bruno Marques; Stéphane Cotin; Brian Bird; Håkon Olav Leira; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Ole Vegard Solberg; Thomas Langø; Pádraig Cantillon-Murphy Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: M N Thomas; G Dieplinger; R R Datta; R Kleinert; H F Fuchs; A Bunck; M Peterhans; C J Bruns; D Stippel; R Wahba Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 4.584