Nicholas C Harvey1, Rebecca J Moon, Avan Aihie Sayer, Georgia Ntani, Justin H Davies, M Kassim Javaid, Sian M Robinson, Keith M Godfrey, Hazel M Inskip, Cyrus Cooper. 1. Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit (N.C.H., R.J.M., A.A.S., G.N., S.M.R., K.M.G., H.M.I., C.C.), University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (N.C.H., K.M.G., C.C.), University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom; Paediatric Endocrinology (R.J.M., J.H.D.), University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom; and National Institute for Health Research Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit (M.K.J., C.C.), University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopedic Centre, Headington, Oxford OX3 7HE, United Kingdom.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] status in pregnancy has been associated with offspring bone development and adiposity. Vitamin D has also been implicated in postnatal muscle function, but little is known about a role for antenatal 25(OH)D exposure in programming muscle development. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the associations between maternal plasma 25(OH)D status at 34 weeks of gestation and offspring lean mass and muscle strength at 4 years of age. DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied a prospective UK population-based mother-offspring cohort: the Southampton Women's Survey (SWS). PARTICIPANTS: Initially, 12,583 nonpregnant women were recruited into the SWS, of whom 3159 had singleton pregnancies; 678 mother-child pairs were included in this analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: At 4 years of age, offspring assessments included hand grip strength and whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, yielding lean mass and percent lean mass. Physical activity was assessed by 7-day accelerometry in a subset of children (n=326). RESULTS: The maternal serum 25(OH)D concentration in pregnancy was positively associated with offspring height-adjusted hand grip strength (β=0.10 SD/SD, P=.013), which persisted after adjustment for maternal confounding factors, duration of breastfeeding, and child's physical activity at 4 years (β=0.13 SD/SD, P=.014). Maternal 25(OH)D was also positively associated with offspring percent lean mass (β=0.11 SD/SD, P=.006), but not total lean mass (β=0.06 SD/SD, P=.15). However, this association did not persist after adjustment for confounding factors (β=0.09 SD/SD, P=.11). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests that intrauterine exposure to 25(OH)D during late pregnancy might influence offspring muscle development through an effect primarily on muscle strength rather than on muscle mass.
CONTEXT: Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] status in pregnancy has been associated with offspring bone development and adiposity. Vitamin D has also been implicated in postnatal muscle function, but little is known about a role for antenatal 25(OH)D exposure in programming muscle development. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the associations between maternal plasma 25(OH)D status at 34 weeks of gestation and offspring lean mass and muscle strength at 4 years of age. DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied a prospective UK population-based mother-offspring cohort: the Southampton Women's Survey (SWS). PARTICIPANTS: Initially, 12,583 nonpregnant women were recruited into the SWS, of whom 3159 had singleton pregnancies; 678 mother-child pairs were included in this analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: At 4 years of age, offspring assessments included hand grip strength and whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, yielding lean mass and percent lean mass. Physical activity was assessed by 7-day accelerometry in a subset of children (n=326). RESULTS: The maternal serum 25(OH)D concentration in pregnancy was positively associated with offspring height-adjusted hand grip strength (β=0.10 SD/SD, P=.013), which persisted after adjustment for maternal confounding factors, duration of breastfeeding, and child's physical activity at 4 years (β=0.13 SD/SD, P=.014). Maternal 25(OH)D was also positively associated with offspring percent lean mass (β=0.11 SD/SD, P=.006), but not total lean mass (β=0.06 SD/SD, P=.15). However, this association did not persist after adjustment for confounding factors (β=0.09 SD/SD, P=.11). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests that intrauterine exposure to 25(OH)D during late pregnancy might influence offspring muscle development through an effect primarily on muscle strength rather than on muscle mass.
Authors: Sarah R Crozier; Nicholas C Harvey; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Cyrus Cooper; Siân M Robinson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Todd M Manini; Brian C Clark; Michael A Nalls; Bret H Goodpaster; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Tamara B Harris Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Paula M Costello; Anthea Rowlerson; Nur Aida Astaman; Fred Erick W Anthony; Avan Aihie Sayer; Cyrus Cooper; Mark A Hanson; Lucy R Green Journal: J Physiol Date: 2008-03-13 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Avan Aihie Sayer; Holly E Syddall; Elaine M Dennison; Helen J Gilbody; Sarah L Duggleby; Cyrus Cooper; David J Barker; David I Phillips Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: M K Javaid; S R Crozier; N C Harvey; C R Gale; E M Dennison; B J Boucher; N K Arden; K M Godfrey; C Cooper Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-01-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sulin Cheng; Eszter Völgyi; Frances A Tylavsky; Arja Lyytikäinen; Timo Törmäkangas; Leiting Xu; Shu Mei Cheng; Heikki Kröger; Markku Alèn; Urho M Kujala Journal: BMC Med Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Maryam Razaghi; Nathalie Gharibeh; Catherine A Vanstone; Olusola F Sotunde; Ali Khamessan; Shu Q Wei; Dayre McNally; Frank Rauch; Glenville Jones; Sarah Kimmins; Hope A Weiler Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 8.472
Authors: K Miliku; T Voortman; O H Franco; J J McGrath; D W Eyles; T H Burne; A Hofman; H Tiemeier; V W V Jaddoe Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: J K Cleal; P E Day; C L Simner; S J Barton; P A Mahon; H M Inskip; K M Godfrey; M A Hanson; C Cooper; R M Lewis; N C Harvey Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Kozeta Miliku; Anna Vinkhuyzen; Laura Me Blanken; John J McGrath; Darryl W Eyles; Thomas H Burne; Albert Hofman; Henning Tiemeier; Eric Ap Steegers; Romy Gaillard; Vincent Wv Jaddoe Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 7.045