Literature DB >> 22976012

Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous.

Jonathan N Pruitt1, Christopher E Oufiero, Leticia Avilés, Susan E Riechert.   

Abstract

The evolution of group living is regarded as a major evolutionary transition and is commonly met with correlated shifts in ancillary characters. We tested for associations between social tendency and a myriad of abiotic variables (e.g., temperature and precipitation) and behavioral traits (e.g., boldness, activity level, and aggression) in a clade of spiders that exhibit highly variable social structures (genus Anelosimus). We found that, relative to their subsocial relatives, social species tended to exhibit reduced aggressiveness toward prey, increased fearfulness toward predators, and reduced activity levels, and they tended to occur in warm, wet habitats with low average wind velocities. Within-species variation in aggressiveness and boldness was also positively associated with sociality. We then assessed the functional consequences of within-species trait variation on reconstituted colonies of four test species (Anelosimus eximius, Anelosimus rupununi, Anelosimus guacamayos, and Anelosimus oritoyacu). We used colonies consisting of known ratios of docile versus aggressive individuals and group foraging success as a measure of colony performance. In all four test species, we found that groups composed of a mixture of docile and aggressive individuals outperformed monotypic groups. Mixed groups were more effective at subduing medium and large prey, and mixed groups collectively gained more mass during shared feeding events. Our results suggest that the iterative evolution of depressed aggressiveness and increased within-species behavioral variation in social spiders is advantageous and could be an adaptation to group living that is analogous to the formation of morphological castes within the social insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22976012     DOI: 10.1086/667576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Social spiders of the genus Anelosimus occur in wetter, more productive environments than non-social species.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Ingi Agnarsson; Jens-Christian Svenning; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-11-01

2.  Social complementation and growth advantages promote socially defective bacterial isolates.

Authors:  Susanne A Kraemer; Gregory J Velicer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Jonathan N Pruitt; Virginia Settepani; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

Authors:  Brendan L McEwen; James L L Lichtenstein; David N Fisher; Colin M Wright; Greg T Chism; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Task syndromes: linking personality and task allocation in social animal groups.

Authors:  J C Loftus; A A Perez; A Sih
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Evolutionary implications of interspecific variation in a maternal effect: a meta-analysis of yolk testosterone response to competition.

Authors:  Alexandra B Bentz; Daniel J Becker; Kristen J Navara
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 7.  From Individuals to Groups and Back: The Evolutionary Implications of Group Phenotypic Composition.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Orr Spiegel
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Are personalities genetically determined? Inferences from subsocial spiders.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies' collective behaviour and success.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Carl N Keiser
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.844

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.