Literature DB >> 24177315

Approach-alcohol action tendencies can be inhibited by cognitive load.

Jason M Sharbanee1, Werner G K Stritzke, M Effin Jamalludin, Reinout W Wiers.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Dysregulated alcohol consumption has been attributed to an imbalance between an approach-alcohol action tendency and executive control processes. However, which specific executive control processes are involved is not known. One candidate executive process is interference suppression, which refers to the suppression of task-irrelevant information through the active maintenance of task-relevant information or a cognitive load.
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to (1) establish whether alcohol action tendency can be inhibited by interference suppression through the use of cognitive loads and (2) to assess whether individual differences in the degree of interference suppression from cognitive loads is related to individual differences in the ability to regulate alcohol consumption.
METHOD: Two groups of social drinkers (total N = 58) who differed in their ability to regulate their alcohol consumption completed a novel cognitive load variant of the approach avoidance task (AAT) and an alcohol taste test.
RESULTS: Results indicated that (1) there was a relationship between alcohol bias on the AAT and alcohol consumption under low load, but not high load, consistent with the hypothesis that the action tendency would be inhibited through interference suppression, and (2) this effect of load was not modified by drinking group, with both groups demonstrating equivalent ability to inhibit the action tendency.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that alcohol action tendency can be inhibited through interference suppression, and that this is effective even for those that have difficulty regulating their alcohol consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24177315     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-013-3318-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  46 in total

Review 1.  On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy.

Authors:  J T Nigg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation.

Authors:  Thomas E Gladwin; Bernd Figner; Eveline A Crone; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Naomi P Friedman
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-02

Review 4.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  Appetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers.

Authors:  Madelon E van Hemel-Ruiter; Peter J de Jong; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior.

Authors:  Margot Peeters; Reinout W Wiers; Karin Monshouwer; Rens van de Schoot; Tim Janssen; Wilma A M Vollebergh
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best?

Authors:  Carolin Eberl; Reinout W Wiers; Steffen Pawelczack; Mike Rinck; Eni S Becker; Johannes Lindenmeyer
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Heavy drinking is associated with deficient response inhibition in women but not in men.

Authors:  Chantal Nederkoorn; Marcus Baltus; Ramona Guerrieri; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Alcohol cues increase cognitive impulsivity in individuals with alcoholism.

Authors:  Xavier Noël; Martial Van der Linden; Mathieu d'Acremont; Antoine Bechara; Bernard Dan; Catherine Hanak; Paul Verbanck
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.415

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for incentive salience sensitization as a pathway to alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Roberto U Cofresí; Bruce D Bartholow; Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Brief report: cognitive control helps explain comorbidity between alcohol use disorder and internalizing disorders.

Authors:  Jarrod M Ellingson; Leah S Richmond-Rakerd; Wendy S Slutske
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  Most of the genetic covariation between major depressive and alcohol use disorders is explained by trait measures of negative emotionality and behavioral control.

Authors:  J M Ellingson; L S Richmond-Rakerd; D J Statham; N G Martin; W S Slutske
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 10.592

4.  The effect of approach/avoidance training on alcohol consumption is mediated by change in alcohol action tendency.

Authors:  Jason M Sharbanee; Litje Hu; Werner G K Stritzke; Reinout W Wiers; Mike Rinck; Colin MacLeod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Tuning down the hedonic brain: Cognitive load reduces neural responses to high-calorie food pictures in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Lotte F van Dillen; Henk van Steenbergen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.