Literature DB >> 19409923

Heavy drinking is associated with deficient response inhibition in women but not in men.

Chantal Nederkoorn1, Marcus Baltus, Ramona Guerrieri, Reinout W Wiers.   

Abstract

Poor response inhibition has been associated with a wide range of problem behaviours, including addictive behaviours, and could represent a general vulnerability factor. Standard tests of response inhibition have used neutral stimuli. Here we tested whether a deficit in response inhibition in heavy drinkers would be stronger for stimuli related to their problem (alcohol) or not. Response inhibition was assessed with a stop signal task, using four classes of pictures: alcohol-related, soft drinks, erotic (control appetitive categories) and neutral pictures. Participants were 32 heavy and 32 light drinkers. An equal amount of men and women were tested in both drinking groups, in view of recent studies reporting that response disinhibition may be most pronounced in heavy drinking women. Main results were first that no domain-specific differences in response inhibition were found in both groups. Second, heavy drinking females showed stronger response inhibition deficits than other groups. Results are discussed in light of a possible gender difference in response inhibition as a risk factor for addictive behaviours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409923     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  39 in total

1.  Stress and alcohol cues exert conjoint effects on go and stop signal responding in male problem drinkers.

Authors:  Martin Zack; Tracy M Woodford; Anne M Tremblay; Lindsay Steinberg; Laurie A Zawertailo; Usoa E Busto
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Moderation of relation between psychological risk factors and alcohol use by sex.

Authors:  Haley A Carroll; Isaac Rhew; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2019-07-02

3.  Approach-alcohol action tendencies can be inhibited by cognitive load.

Authors:  Jason M Sharbanee; Werner G K Stritzke; M Effin Jamalludin; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Neural correlates of a Go/NoGo task with alcohol stimuli in light and heavy young drinkers.

Authors:  Susan L Ames; Savio W Wong; Antoine Bechara; Christopher Cappelli; Mark Dust; Jerry L Grenard; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Neurocognitive performance in alcohol use disorder using the NIH toolbox: Role of severity and sex differences.

Authors:  Lindsay R Meredith; Aaron C Lim; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Effects of yohimbine and drug cues on impulsivity and attention in cocaine-dependent men and women and sex-matched controls.

Authors:  M M Moran-Santa Maria; N L Baker; A L McRae-Clark; J J Prisciandaro; K T Brady
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Alcohol-related cues potentiate alcohol impairment of behavioral control in drinkers.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-08-18

Review 8.  Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Neural processes of an indirect analog of risk taking in young nondependent adult alcohol drinkers-an FMRI study of the stop signal task.

Authors:  Sarah R Bednarski; Emily Erdman; Xi Luo; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Higher levels of trait impulsiveness and a less effective response inhibition are linked to more intense cue-elicited craving for alcohol in alcohol-dependent patients.

Authors:  Harilaos Papachristou; Chantal Nederkoorn; Remco Havermans; Peggy Bongers; Shalana Beunen; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.