BACKGROUND: Individuals with alcoholism are characterized by both attentional bias for alcohol cues and prepotent response inhibition deficit. We tested the hypothesis that alcoholics exhibit greater cognitive disinhibition when the response to be suppressed is associated with alcohol-related information. METHODS: Forty recently detoxified individuals with alcoholism were compared with 40 healthy non-substance abusers on the "Alcohol-Shifting Task", a variant of the go/no-go paradigm requiring a motor response to targets and no response to distracters. The aim was to test the ability of alcoholics to discriminate between alcohol-related and neutral words. Sometimes, the alcohol-related words were the targets for the "go" response, with neutral words as distracters, sometimes the reverse. Several shifts in target type occurred during the task. RESULTS: Alcoholics made significantly more commission errors (i.e., press a key when a distracter displayed) and more omission errors (i.e., not press a key when a target displayed) than controls. Moreover, the number of commission errors was greater in alcoholics when alcohol-related stimuli had to be detected. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that alcoholics exhibit a basic prepotent response inhibition deficit, which is enhanced when the response to be suppressed is related to alcohol. We discuss clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with alcoholism are characterized by both attentional bias for alcohol cues and prepotent response inhibition deficit. We tested the hypothesis that alcoholics exhibit greater cognitive disinhibition when the response to be suppressed is associated with alcohol-related information. METHODS: Forty recently detoxified individuals with alcoholism were compared with 40 healthy non-substance abusers on the "Alcohol-Shifting Task", a variant of the go/no-go paradigm requiring a motor response to targets and no response to distracters. The aim was to test the ability of alcoholics to discriminate between alcohol-related and neutral words. Sometimes, the alcohol-related words were the targets for the "go" response, with neutral words as distracters, sometimes the reverse. Several shifts in target type occurred during the task. RESULTS: Alcoholics made significantly more commission errors (i.e., press a key when a distracter displayed) and more omission errors (i.e., not press a key when a target displayed) than controls. Moreover, the number of commission errors was greater in alcoholics when alcohol-related stimuli had to be detected. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that alcoholics exhibit a basic prepotent response inhibition deficit, which is enhanced when the response to be suppressed is related to alcohol. We discuss clinical and theoretical implications of these findings.
Authors: Chella Kamarajan; Bernice Porjesz; Kevin Jones; David Chorlian; Ajayan Padmanabhapillai; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Arthur Stimus; Henri Begleiter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-10-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: F C Murphy; B J Sahakian; J S Rubinsztein; A Michael; R D Rogers; T W Robbins; E S Paykel Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Xavier Noël; M Colmant; Marial Van Der Linden; Antoine Bechara; Quentin Bullens; Catherine Hanak; Paul Verbanck Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: X Noël; M Van der Linden; N Schmidt; R Sferrazza; C Hanak; O Le Bon; J De Mol; C Kornreich; I Pelc; P Verbanck Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2001-12
Authors: Martin Zack; Tracy M Woodford; Anne M Tremblay; Lindsay Steinberg; Laurie A Zawertailo; Usoa E Busto Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Aqilah M McCane; Michael J DeLory; Maureen M Timm; Sarine S Janetsian-Fritz; Christopher C Lapish; Cristine L Czachowski Journal: Alcohol Date: 2017-08-19 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Maartje Luijten; Marise W J Machielsen; Dick J Veltman; Robert Hester; Lieuwe de Haan; Ingmar H A Franken Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Jason M Sharbanee; Werner G K Stritzke; M Effin Jamalludin; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.530