Literature DB >> 33392932

Indeterminate Prenatal Ultrasounds and Maternal Anxiety: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Marielle S Gross1,2,3, Hyeyoung Ju4, Lauren M Osborne4,5, Eric B Jelin6, Priya Sekar7, Angie C Jelin4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal ultrasounds often yield indeterminate (incomplete or minor abnormality) findings with limited clinical utility. We evaluate impact of indeterminate findings on maternal anxiety.
METHODS: A single-U.S.-center prospective cohort study administered the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS; control mean = 13.4; > 20 denotes clinically significant anxiety) before and after prenatal ultrasounds in February-May 2017. Ultrasound reports were coded as: normal; indeterminate; or major abnormality. Primary outcome was anxiety after indeterminate vs. normal ultrasounds. Secondary outcomes included anxiety change from pre-to-post-ultrasound and relative to women's characteristics. Linear regression adjusted for confounders.
RESULTS: Of 286 ultrasounds, 51.0% were normal, 40.5% indeterminate (22.0% incomplete; 18.5% minor abnormality), and 8.0% major abnormalities. Indeterminate findings were unrelated to age, race, parity, infertility, or psychiatric history, but associated with gestational age (26.6%/45.0%/52.5% for first/second/third trimesters; p < 0.001), and obesity (48.8 vs. 37.0%; p = 0.031). Pretest anxiety was highest in second/third trimesters (p = 0.029), and in subjects aged age ≤ 24 or younger(p < 0.001), with a history of anxiety (p < 0.001),) or with prior pregnancy loss (p = 0.011). Mean anxiety score decreased pre-to-posttest across all groups. Indeterminate findings were associated with higher PASS scores than normal findings: pretest 20.1 vs. 16.4 (p = 0.026) and posttest 16.9 vs. 12.2 (p = 0.009; adjusted-p = 0.01). Versus normal ultrasounds, incomplete findings were associated with higher post-ultrasound anxiety (p = 0.007; adjusted-p = 0.01) and smaller decreases from pre-to-posttest (adjusted-p = 0.03), whereas minor abnormalities had higher pretest anxiety (p = 0.029) with larger pre-to-posttest decreases (adjusted-p =0.010). DISCUSSION: Indeterminate ultrasounds, especially incomplete findings, are associated with significantly higher anxiety than normal findings, suggesting need for evidence-based counseling, management and strategies for decreasing number of indeterminate results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incomplete findings; Maternal anxiety; Minor abnormality; Prenatal ultrasound; Soft marker

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392932      PMCID: PMC8062287          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-03042-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  16 in total

Review 1.  Obstetric ultrasound utilization in the United States: data from various health plans.

Authors:  Daniel F O'Keeffe; Alfred Abuhamad
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Isolated intracardiac echogenic focus on routine ultrasound: implications for practice.

Authors:  Heather Murphy; Julia C Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Is counselling for CCAM that difficult? Learning from parental experience.

Authors:  Lucia Aite; Antonio Zaccara; Alessandro Trucchi; Antonella Nahom; Irma Capolupo; Luisa Mobili; Pietro Bagolan
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-07

4.  Fetal ultrasound examination and assessment of genetic soft markers in Sweden: are ethical principles respected?

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Charlotta Ingvoldstad; Peter Lindgren
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women's reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening.

Authors:  Annika Ahman; Karin Runestam; Anna Sarkadi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-18

6.  Anxiety scores before and after prenatal testing for congenital anomalies.

Authors:  I Kowalcek; G Huber; C Lammers; J Brunk; I Bieniakiewicz; U Gembruch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Discovery of soft markers on fetal ultrasound: maternal implications.

Authors:  Mary Carolan; Ellen Hodnett
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  Suspicious findings in antenatal care and their implications from the mothers' perspective: a prospective study in Germany.

Authors:  Juliana Petersen; Albrecht Jahn
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie Oscarsson; Tomas Gottvall; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Maternal psychological responses during pregnancy after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies: A prospective longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Anne Kaasen; Anne Helbig; Ulrik F Malt; Tormod Næs; Hans Skari; Guttorm Haugen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.