| Literature DB >> 24175934 |
Emilie L A Matsumoto-Takahashi, Pilarita Tongol-Rivera, Elena A Villacorte, Ray U Angluben, Junko Yasuoka, Shigeyuki Kano1, Masamine Jimba.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria remains one of the most prevalent and fatal diseases among the inhabitants of Palawan in the Philippines. Palawan, where healthcare services remain limited, has the highest malaria endemicity in the country. To eliminate malaria, effective prevention measures should be conducted alongside early diagnosis and prompt treatment, which are the major tasks of the trained microscopists in Palawan. However, while the microscopists have implemented community awareness-raising activities aimed at preventing transmission of malaria, the nature and quality of these activities have not been evaluated. The present study identified the factors associated with the strengthening of community awareness-raising activities for malaria prevention implemented by microscopists in Palawan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24175934 PMCID: PMC4228447 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Socio-demographic status of participants with respect to place of assignment
| (Mean = 39.4, SD = 7.4, | ||||
| Low (≤39.4) | 62 (48.8%) | 35 (52.2%) | 27 (45%) | 0.368 |
| High (>39.4) | 64 (50.4%) | 31 (46.3%) | 33 (55%) | |
| | | | | |
| Man | 13 (10.2%) | 7 (10.4%) | 6 (10%) | 0.934 |
| Woman | 114 (89.8%) | 60 (89.6%) | 54 (90%) | |
| | | | | |
| Never married | 12 (9.4%) | 6 (9%) | 6 (10%) | 0.518 |
| Married | 105 (82.7%) | 56 (83.6%) | 49 (81.7%) | |
| Divorced | 2 (1.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3.3%) | |
| Widowed | 6 (93%) | 3 (4.5%) | 3 (5%) | |
| | | | | |
| No grade completed | 3 (2.4%) | 2 (3%) | 1 (1.7%) | 0.404 |
| Elementary | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.7%) | |
| High school | 61 (48%) | 36 (53.7%) | 25 (41.7%) | |
| College | 58 (45.7%) | 28 (41.8%) | 30 (50%) | |
| Higher | 4 (3.1) | 1 (1.5%) | 3 (5%) | |
| | | | | |
| Homemakers | 93 (73.2%) | 49 (73.1%) | 44 (73.3%) | 0.408 |
| Farmer: coconut | 6 (4.7%) | 1 (1.5%) | 5 (8.3%) | |
| Farmer: rice | 8 (6.3%) | 5 (7.5%) | 3 (5%) | |
| Fishery | 15 (11.8%) | 8 (11.9%) | 7 (11.7%) | |
| Tourism-related | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (1.5%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Midwife | 2 (1.6%) | 1 (1.5%) | 1 (1.7%) | |
| Other | 2 (1.6%) | 2 (3%) | 0 (0%) | |
| | | | | |
| Bicolana | 7 (5.5%) | 4 (6%) | 3 (5%) | |
| Bisaya | 28 (22%) | 11(16.4%) | 17 (28.3%) | |
| Ceuano | 7 (5.5%) | 5 (7.5%) | 2 (3.3%) | |
| Cuyunon | 33 (26%) | 27 (40.3%) | 6 (10%) | |
| Ilocano | 5 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (8.3%) | |
| Kagayan | 3 (2.4%) | 1 (1.5%) | 2 (3.3%) | |
| Mindanao | 2 (1.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3.3%) | |
| Palawan | 4 (3.1%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (6.7%) | |
| Tagalog | 14 (11%) | 6 (9%) | 8 (13.3%) | |
| Tagbanwa | 5 (3.9%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (8.3%) | |
| Mixed | 4 (3.1%) | 2 (3%) | 2 (3.3%) | |
| Other | 4 (3.1%) | 1 (1.5%) | 3 (5%) | |
| | | | | |
| Catholic | 86 (67.7%) | 52 (77.6%) | 34 (56.7%) | 0.006** |
| Christian except Catholic | 35 (27.6%) | 15 (22.4%) | 20 (33.3%) | |
| Muslim | 6 (4.7%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (10%) | |
| (Median = 3, SD = 1.62, | ||||
| Low (≤3) | 59 (46.5%) | 19 (31.7%) | 40 (59.7%) | 0.002** |
| High (>3) | 68 (53.5%) | 41 (68.3%) | 27 (40.3%) | |
| (Median = 104, SD =38.7, | ||||
| Low (≤104) | 71 (55.9%) | 25 (41.7%) | 46 (58.7%) | 0.002** |
| High (>104) | 56 (44.1%) | 35 (58.3%) | 21 (31.3%) | |
| (Median = 15, SD = 26.3, | ||||
| Low (≤15) | 73 (57.5%) | 32 (53.4%) | 41 (61.2%) | 0.371 |
| High (>15) | 54 (42.5%) | 28 (46.7%) | 26 (38.8%) | |
| | | | | |
| Voluntary | 119 (93.7%) | 60 (89.6%) | 59 (98.3%) | 0.042 |
| Nominee | 8 (6.3%) | 7 (10.4%) | 1 (1.7%) | |
1This scale scores from 1–8 points as follows, with 1 point each for the following: electricity, radio, television, refrigerator, bicycle, motorcycle, bike-car, and tin or cement wall.
*Significant place of assignment difference (0.01 < p < 0.05), **Significant place of assignment difference (0.001 < p < 0.01), ***Significant place of assignment difference (p < 0.001).
aIndependent t-test, bWelch test, and cMann–Whitney U test were conducted to clarify the place of assignment difference between the northern and the southern regions.
Figure 1Conceptual framework. The authors hypothesize that an association exists between “community awareness-raising activities for malaria prevention” and the following multi-directional variables: “socio-demographic status”, “service quality”, “knowledge on malaria”, “ability in malaria microscopy”, “job satisfaction”, and “self-preventive measures against malaria”. Sub-variables of the each variable are in the circles of the conceptual framework. API, annual parasite index.
Distribution of population, confirmed malaria cases, API, and microscopist/region
| Northern Region | 334,392 | 200 (57%) | 0.60*** | 115 | 67 (58.3%) |
| Puerto Princesa City | 207,119 | 795 (71.2%) | 3.84 | 30 | 0 (0%) |
| Southern Region | 330,879 | 3,989 (78.3%) | 12.1*** | 145 | 60 (41.4%) |
***Chi-square test between northern region and southern region (p < 0.0001).
Results of ability in malaria microscopy assessment indicators
| • Preparation of microscope, needle, methanol and first-aid dressings, Giemsa staining solution, slides and object slides | - | - | 98 |
| • Check the expiry dates of all solutions | - | - | 74 |
| • Write the names of the patient on the slides | - | - | 92 |
| • Write the date on each slide | - | - | 63 |
| • Select the 5th finger of the left hand to take the peripheral blood sample | - | - | 92 |
| • Clean the finger with alcohol swab and allow it to air dry | - | - | 98 |
| • Record the results in the CHW register | - | - | 98 |
| | |||
| • Take patient’s peripheral blood | - | - | 98 |
| • Prepare samples immediately after taking the blood | - | - | 96 |
| • Use clean slide | - | - | 100 |
| • Put one droplet of blood on the slide | - | - | 79 |
| • Using cover glass, spread the blood so as to obtain a thin layer of blood cells | - | - | 97 |
| • The angle of the cover glass is 30 degrees | - | - | 72 |
| • Dry immediately | - | - | 99 |
| • Fix with methanol for 2 to 5 minutes | - | - | 94 |
| • Too much drying damages the staining | - | - | 26 |
| • Keep the slides fixed with methanol horizontally and add the staining solution | - | - | 82 |
| • When numerous samples are used, use staining bottle | - | - | 94 |
| • Staining time depends on the concentration of the dyes(usually between 10 and 30 minutes) | - | - | 88 |
| • Maximum staining time is 45 minutes and even if you wait longer,the color does not change | - | - | 49 |
| • Wash with buffer | - | - | 21 |
| • If insoluble pigments are present at the surface of the solutions,take them off carefully | - | - | 38 |
| • Adjust the intensity of the staining through washing time with the buffer | - | - | 17 |
| • After washing, take off water quickly and dry with cold air | - | - | 100 |
| • Observe with microscope | - | - | 100 |
| • Nuclei of malaria parasite inside red blood cells will be stained in red | - | - | 81 |
| • The cytoplasm of malaria parasite inside red blood cells will be stained in | - | - | 94 |
| • When malaria parasite is found inside red blood cells, check the type of | - | - | 97 |
| | |||
| • Put on a new pair of gloves when starting | - | - | 67 |
| • Do not touch patient blood | - | - | 85 |
| • Use a sterile lancet to puncture the patient finger | - | - | 100 |
| • Discard the needle in sharps bins immediately after usage | - | - | 100 |
| • Use a new needle for each patient | - | - | 100 |
| • Discard glove wrappers, alcohol swab, desiccant and cassette in non-sharps | - | - | 95 |
| | | | |
| Cited in Table | 0.55 | 0.12 | - |
Questionnaire on knowledge of the morphology of infected RBCs and answers of microscopists
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 3 | 2.4 | 3 | 2.4 | 3 | 2.4 |
| Small | 49 | 38.6 | 5 | 3.9 | 44 | 34.6 |
| Normal | 4 | 3.1 | ||||
| Big | 1 | 0.8 | 6 | 4.7 | ||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 5 | 3.9 | 4 | 3.1 | 14 | 11 |
| Maurer’s dots | 22 | 17.3 | 39 | 30.7 | ||
| Schuffner’s dots | 16 | 12.6 | 20 | 15.7 | ||
| Ziemann’s dots | 2 | 1.6 | 3 | 2.4 | ||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 5 | 3.9 | 10 | 7.9 | 11 | 8.7 |
| Always | 40 | 31.5 | 48 | 37.8 | ||
| Sometimes | 47 | 37 | 55 | 43.3 | 49 | 38.6 |
| Never | 3 | 2.4 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 8 | 6.3 | 7 | 5.5 | 20 | 15.7 |
| Only the ring form | 32 | 25.2 | 59 | 46.5 | ||
| All stages | 60 | 47.2 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 8 | 6.3 | 7 | 5.5 | 9 | 7.1 |
| Always | 94 | 74 | 54 | 42.5 | ||
| Never | 32 | 25.2 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 9 | 7.1 | 9 | 7.1 | 13 | 10.2 |
| Singular number | 69 | 54.3 | ||||
| Plural number | 35 | 27.6 | 30 | 23.6 | ||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 2 | 1.6 | 5 | 3.9 | 6 | 4.7 |
| Always | 48 | 37.8 | 34 | 26.8 | ||
| Never | 14 | 11 | ||||
| | | | | | | |
| Do not know | 2 | 1.6 | 5 | 3.9 | 9 | 7.1 |
| Always | 9 | 7.1 | 19 | 15.0 | ||
| Never | 7 | 5.5 | ||||
Correct answers are indicated with bold typeface.
Factors associated with community awareness-raising activities for malaria prevention
| | | |
| API | 0.09 | 0.303 |
| Age | −0.02 | 0.856 |
| Household wealth | 0.70 | 0.435 |
| Duration of work as microscopist | −0.12 | 0.197 |
| Distance from home to nearest health center | −0.19 | 0.035* |
| Active detection | 0.17 | 0.064 |
| Diagnosis and treatment | 0.19 | 0.030* |
| Prescription of anti-malarials | 0.01 | 0.883 |
| Follow-up | 0.11 | 0.204 |
| Preparation and documentation | 0.26 | 0.003** |
| Slide preparation and observation | 0.17 | 0.055 |
| Knowledge on the morphology of infected RBCs | 0.16 | 0.073 |
| Safe handling | 0.09 | 0.343 |
| Malaria symptoms | 0.09 | 0.328 |
| Malaria transmission | −0.19 | 0.034* |
| Vector species | 0.04 | 0.679 |
| Vector’s most active time | 0.25 | 0.004** |
| | | |
| General job satisfaction | ||
| Intrinsic job satisfaction | 0.15 | 0.095 |
| Extrinsic job satisfaction | 0.20 | 0.027* |
*Significant place of assignment difference (0.01 < p < 0.05), **Significant place of assignment difference (0.001 < p < 0.01), ***Significant place of assignment difference (p < 0.001). API, annual parasite index.
Correlation matrix
| Community awareness-raising activities for malaria prevention | 1 | | | | | | | | |
| Place of assignment (1 = northern region, 2 = southern region) | 0.05 | 1 | | | | | | | |
| Annual parasite index | 0.09 | 1 | | | | | | ||
| Service quality | −0.02 | 0.05 | 1 | | | | | ||
| Knowledge on malaria | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.13 | 1 | | | | ||
| Self-preventive measures against malaria | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 1 | | | |||
| Ability in malaria microscopy | −0.70 | −0.06 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 1 | | |||
| General job satisfaction | 0.01 | 1 | |||||||
| | Mean | 2.59 | - | 7.11 | 17.70 | 8.38 | 4.19 | 72.53 | 84.00 |
| | SD | 0.19 | - | 8.19 | 2.60 | 1.72 | 0.89 | 6.28 | 8.77 |
| | Skewness | 1.67 | - | 1.15 | −0.97 | −1.05 | −0.76 | −0.50 | −0.31 |
| Cronbach’s α | 0.733 | - | - | 0.581 | 0.545 | 0.747 | 0.667 | 0.857 | |
*Significant place of assignment difference (0.01 < p < 0.05), **Significant place of assignment difference (0.001 < p < 0.01), ***Significant place of assignment difference (p < 0.001).
Figure 2The path diagram. Chi-square = 12.667, df = 13, CFI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000. Place of assignment is calculated as follows: the northern region is “1” and the southern region is “2.” API, annual parasite index.