| Literature DB >> 32285911 |
Emilie Louise Akiko Matsumoto-Takahashi1, Pilarita Tongol-Rivera2, Elena Andino Villacorte2, Ray Uyaan Angluben3, Masamine Jimba4, Shigeyuki Kano1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the overall job satisfaction and its associated factors among microscopists as community health workers who specialize in malaria microscopic diagnosis and treatment in Palawan, the Philippines. The study offered new insights to further lessen the burden of malaria and improve treatment by enhancing their commitment and satisfaction.Entities:
Keywords: Philippines; community health workers; health equity; job satisfaction; malaria; patient
Year: 2021 PMID: 32285911 PMCID: PMC7807231 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Health ISSN: 1876-3405 Impact factor: 2.473
Figure 1Conceptual framework. The present study was a mixed-methods study. The quantitative study was analysed using SEM and the qualitative study was analysed using framework analysis. In the initial SEM analysis, the dependent variable was general job satisfaction and the independent variables were sociodemographic status, microscopists, ability (service quality, knowledge of malaria and malaria microscopy ability) and malaria trend (API). All variables used in the SEM were analysed as continuous observed variables.
Figure 2Statistical analysis of quantitative study. The dependent variable was general job satisfaction and the independent variables were socio-demographic status (age, gender, marital status, education, occupation, religion, household wealth, duration of work, and distance from home to health center), microscopists’ ability (service quality, knowledge on malaria, and malaria microscopy ability), and malaria trend (annual parasite index). All variables used in the SEM were analyzed as continuously observed variables.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the microscopists
| Sociodemographic characteristics | Quantitative study (n=127) | Qualitative study (n=50) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD) | ||
| Gender, n (%) | 39.4 (7.4) | 38.6 (6.8) |
| Male | 13 (10.2) | 8 (16.0) |
| Female | 114 (89.8) | 41 (82.0) |
| Marital status, n (%) | ||
| Never married | 12 (9.4) | 5 (10.0) |
| Married | 105 (82.7) | 42 (84.0) |
| Divorced | 2 (1.6) | 1 (2.0) |
| Widowed | 6 (4.7) | 2 (4.0) |
| Education, n (%) | ||
| No grade completed | 3 (2.4) | 3 (6.0) |
| Elementary | 1 (0.8) | 1 (2.0) |
| High school | 61 (48.0) | 28 (56.0) |
| Higher | 58 (45.7) | 18 (36.0) |
| Occupation, n (%) | ||
| Homemaker | 93 (73.2) | 33 (66.0) |
| Farmer | 14 (11.0) | 12 (24.0) |
| Other | 20 (15.7) | 5 (10.0) |
| Religion, n (%) | ||
| Catholic | 86 (67.7) | 28 (56.0) |
| Christian except Catholic | 35 (27.6) | 22 (44.0) |
| Household wealth | 3.0 (1.6) | 2.5 (1.4) |
| Duration of work as microscopist (months), mean (SD) | 94 (38.7) | 94 (45.9) |
| Distance from home to health centre (min), mean (SD) | 21 (26.3) | 22 (30.0) |
SD: standard deviation.
aThis scale ranges from 1 to 8 points with 1 point each for the following: electricity, radio, television, refrigerator, bicycle, motorcycle, bike/car and tin or cement wall.
Activities as microscopists (N=127)
| Activities | Mean | SD | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Maximum | |||
| Preventive activities (hours/week) | ||||
| Dry season | 18.2 | 24.9 | 0 | 90 |
| Wet season | 16.3 | 21.6 | 0 | 77 |
| Curative activities (hours/week) | ||||
| Dry season | 9.4 | 18.0 | 0 | 54 |
| Wet season | 8.4 | 16.4 | 0 | 43 |
| Patients per week | 6.6 | 5.9 | 0 | 20 |
Detailed diagnoses per week (N=127)
| Species | n | % |
| Total | ||
| No patients | 106 | 84.1 |
| 1 patient | 10 | 7.9 |
| 2 patients | 7 | 5.6 |
| 3 patients | 2 | 1.6 |
| 4 patients | 1 | 0.8 |
|
| ||
| No patients | 110 | 87.3 |
| 1 patient | 8 | 6.3 |
| 2 patients | 5 | 4.0 |
| 3 patients | 2 | 1.6 |
| 4 patients | 1 | 0.8 |
|
| ||
| No patients | 122 | 96.8 |
| 1 patient | 2 | 1.6 |
| 2 patients | 2 | 1.6 |
| 3 patients | 0 | 0 |
| 4 patients | 0 | 0 |
Job satisfaction among microscopists (N=127)
| Job satisfaction | Mean | SD | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Maximum | |||
| Q1. Being able to keep busy all the time | 4.1 | 0.8 | 3 | 5 |
| Q2. The chance to work alone on the job | 4.2 | 0.8 | 3 | 5 |
| Q3. The chance to do different things from time to time | 3.9 | 1.0 | 1 | 5 |
| Q4. The chance to be ‘somebody’ in the community | 4.3 | 0.9 | 2 | 5 |
| Q5. The way my boss handles his/her workers | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2 | 5 |
| Q6. The competence of my supervisor in making decisions | 3.8 | 1.0 | 1 | 5 |
| Q7. Being able to do things that do not go against my conscience | 4.3 | 0.9 | 3 | 5 |
| Q8. The way my job provides for steady employment | 4.4 | 0.8 | 3 | 5 |
| Q9. The chance to do things for other people | 4.5 | 0.7 | 3 | 5 |
| Q10. The chance to tell people what to do | 4.6 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 |
| Q11. The chance to do something that makes use of my abilities | 4.2 | 0.9 | 3 | 5 |
| Q12. The way malaria control programme policies are put into practice | 4.7 | 0.5 | 4 | 5 |
| Q13. My pay and the amount of work I do | 3.4 | 1.2 | 1 | 5 |
| Q14. The chances for advancement on this job | 4.6 | 0.7 | 3 | 5 |
| Q15. The freedom to use my own judgement | 3.9 | 1.0 | 2 | 5 |
| Q16. The chance to try my own methods of doing the job | 4.2 | 0.9 | 3 | 5 |
| Q17. The working conditions | 3.8 | 0.9 | 2 | 5 |
| Q18. The way my co-workers get along with each other | 4.2 | 0.9 | 2 | 5 |
| Q19. The praise I get for doing a good job | 4.3 | 0.7 | 3 | 5 |
| Q20. The feeling of accomplishment I get from the job | 4.4 | 0.7 | 3 | 5 |
| General job satisfaction | 83.4 | 8.9 | 67 | 97 |
| Intrinsic job satisfaction | 50.8 | 6.2 | 39 | 60 |
| Extrinsic job satisfaction | 24.8 | 2.8 | 20 | 30 |
Each question was evaluated with five response levels ranging from ‘very dissatisfied’ (1) to ‘very satisfied’ (5).
aThe sum of the scores for Q1–Q20.
bThe sum of the scores for Q1–Q4, Q7–Q11, Q15, Q16 and Q20.
cThe sum of the scores for Q5, Q6, Q12–Q14 and Q19.
Correlation matrix (N=127)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 General job satisfaction | 1 | |||||
| 2 Intrinsic job satisfaction | 0.945** | 1 | ||||
| 3 Extrinsic job satisfaction | 0.807** | 0.610** | 1 | |||
| 4 API | 0.320** | 0.281** | 0.309** | 1 | ||
| 5 Ability in malaria microscopy | 0.266** | 0.251** | 0.174 | 0.062 | 1 | |
| 6 Ethnicity | 0.226* | 0.300** | 0.106 | 0.359** | 0.078 | 1 |
| Mean | 84.01 | 51.13 | 24.89 | 7.09 | 72.5 | 1.66 |
| SD | 8.77 | 6.04 | 2.77 | 8.16 | 6.28 | 0.475 |
| Skewness | −0.312 | −0.452 | −0.101 | 1.16 | −0.497 | −0.690 |
*p>0.01–<0.05, **p>0.001–<0.01, ***p<0.001.
aEthnicity was calculated as follows: Tagalog was scored as 1 and other was scored as 2.
Figure 3Determinants of general job satisfaction of microscopists (N=127): χ2=0.6, df=2, CFI=1.000, RMSEA=0.000. All relationships and correlations are significant (p<0.05). Ethnicity was calculated as follows: Tagalog and amalgamation of Tagalog was scored as 1 and other was scored as 2.
Analytical framework of job satisfaction (N=50)
| Code | Description |
|---|---|
| Devotion | To help the community, village and people |
| Inquisitive | To increase knowledge about malaria |
| Case reduction | Malaria incidence is decreasing |
aOnly mentioned in the FGDs in the northern regions.