Literature DB >> 30706479

The macroscopic and histomorphological properties of periosteal rib lesions and its relation with disease duration: evidence from the Luis Lopes Skeletal Collection (Lisbon, Portugal).

Sandra Assis1,2, Anne Keenleyside3.   

Abstract

Periosteal new bone formation (PNBF) is a common finding in a large spectrum of diseases. In clinical practice, the morphology and location of periosteal lesions are frequently used to assist in the differential diagnosis of distinct bone conditions. Less commonly reported is the presence of PNBF on the ribs. This contrasts with the data retrieved from the study of skeletonized human remains that shows a high frequency of cases and a strong, albeit not specific, association between periosteal rib lesions and pulmonary conditions (e.g. tuberculosis). Despite that, an overall disagreement regarding the specificity and non-specificity of periosteal reactions exists in the study of dry bone remains. The insufficient number of clinical models exploring the morphology and the pathophysiology of PNBF's and the lack of systematic studies of pathological samples with a known diagnosis are claimed as major reasons for the disagreements. This study aimed to describe and compare the macroscopic and the histomorphologic appearance of periosteal rib lesions and to discuss their usefulness as diagnostic indicators. To pursue this goal, an assemblage of 13 rib samples (males = 11, females = 2, mean age-at-death = 36.6 years old) was collected from the Luis Lopes Skeletal Collection (Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal). The assemblage belongs to individuals who died from pulmonary-TB (group 1), non-TB pulmonary infections (group 2) and other conditions (group 3). Prior to sample preparation, the ribs were visually inspected and the PNBF described according to its thickness, the degree of cortical integration and the type of new bone formed (e.g. woven, lamellar or both). After sampling, each bone sample was prepared for histological analysis under plane and polarized light microscopy. Macroscopically, the results showed no differences in the new bone composition between cause-of-death groups. Only slight differences in the degree of cortical integration, which was most frequently classified as mild to high in the pulmonary-TB group, were observed. Histologically, no distinguishing features were identified by pathological group. However, new bone microarchitectures were observed compatible with (1) acute, fast-growing processes (e.g. spiculated reactions), (2) long-standing processes with a rapid bone formation (e.g. appositional layering of bone) and/or (3) chronic, slow-growing processes (e.g. layers of compact lamellae). To some extent, these distinct rates of disease progression resonate with the cause-of-death listed for some individuals. Despite the small sample size, the results of this investigation are in agreement with previous studies, according to which the macroscopic and histological appearance of periosteal formations are not specific for a particular pathological conditions. Nevertheless, the results support the conclusion that the morphology of periosteal lesions is a good biological indicator for inferring the rate of progression and duration of pathological processes. This study provides important reference data regarding the histomorphology of periosteal lesions that can be used for comparative purposes, as well as to narrow down the differential diagnosis in unidentified skeletal remains.
© 2019 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appositional new bone formation; bone remodelling; chronic and acute diseases; differential diagnosis; palaeohistopathology; periosteal reactions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30706479      PMCID: PMC6422801          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  54 in total

1.  Organization of apatite crystals in human woven bone.

Authors:  X Su; K Sun; F Z Cui; W J Landis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Imaging of periosteal reactions associated with focal lesions of bone.

Authors:  A E T Wenaden; T A Szyszko; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  D Chappard; M F Baslé; E Legrand; M Audran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Pulmonary congestion in acute heart failure: from hemodynamics to lung injury and barrier dysfunction].

Authors:  Loukas Pappas; Gerasimos Filippatos
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.753

5.  Rib lesions in skeletons from early neolithic sites in Central Germany: on the trail of tuberculosis at the onset of agriculture.

Authors:  Nicole Nicklisch; Frank Maixner; Robert Ganslmeier; Susanne Friederich; Veit Dresely; Harald Meller; Albert Zink; Kurt W Alt
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 6.  Rib lesions and tuberculosis: the palaeopathological evidence.

Authors:  C A Roberts; A Boylston; L Buckley; A C Chamberlain; E M Murphy
Journal:  Tuber Lung Dis       Date:  1998

7.  New bone production and periosteal reaction.

Authors:  J Edeiken; P J Hodes; L H Caplan
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1966-07

8.  The diagnostic value of microscopy in dry bone palaeopathology: A review.

Authors:  H H De Boer; A E Van der Merwe; G J R Maat
Journal:  Int J Paleopathol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 1.393

Review 9.  The periosteal sunburst reaction to bone metastases. A literature review and report of 20 additional cases.

Authors:  R A Bloom; E Libson; J E Husband; D J Stoker
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  MR imaging of periosteal and cortical changes of bone.

Authors:  G B Greenfield; D L Warren; R A Clark
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.