Literature DB >> 24175044

Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy a feasible technique for the treatment of staghorn calculi?

Sang Cheol Lee1, Chang Hee Kim, Kwang Taek Kim, Tae Beom Kim, Khae Hawn Kim, Han Jung, Sang Jin Yoon, Jin Kyu Oh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) remains a challenging technique for the surgical treatment of staghorn renal calculi. Our study was designed to compare surgical outcomes between conventional and tubeless PNL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent conventional or tubeless PNL under general anesthesia performed by a single surgeon (H.J.) for the treatment of staghorn calculi between 2003 and 2012. All patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included patients who underwent conventional PNL and group 2 included patients who were managed by tubeless PNL for the treatment of staghorn calculi. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were analyzed between the two groups, including age, stone burden, complications, any interventions, and duration of hospital stay.
RESULTS: A total of 165 patients (group 1, 106; group 2, 59) were enrolled in the study. No significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, or stone laterality were observed between the two groups. The mean stone burdens (±standard deviation) of group 1 and group 2 were 633.6 (±667.4) and 529.9 (±362.8), respectively (p=0.271). The postoperative stone-free clearance rate was higher in group 2 (78.0%) than in group 1 (69.8%); however, the difference was not clinically significant (p=0.127). In addition, no significant differences in postoperative complications, including fever, bleeding, infection, or additional interventions, were observed between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that tubeless PNL has the same effectiveness and safety as conventional PNL in the treatment of staghorn calculi. Tubeless PNL may be feasible for managing renal staghorn calculi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney calculi; Nephrolithotomy; Percutaneous nephrostomy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24175044      PMCID: PMC3806994          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.10.693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  16 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

Review 2.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy made easier: a practical guide, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Raymond Ko; Frédéric Soucy; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  Advances in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jodi A Antonelli; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Felix Wezel; Maurice Stephan Michel; Patrick Honeck; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Wahib Isac; Emad Rizkala; Xiaobo Liu; Mark Noble; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does position matter? - prone, supine and variations.

Authors:  Ranan DasGupta; Anup Patel
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with retrograde nephrostomy access: a forgotten technique revisited.

Authors:  Sri Sivalingam; Turki Al-Essawi; Denis Hosking
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Mert Ali Karadag; Kadir Tepeler; Erhan Sari; Yalcin Berberoglu; Murat Baykal; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Comparative Study between Standard and Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sung Il Yun; Yoon Hyung Lee; Jae Soo Kim; Sung Ryong Cho; Bum Soo Kim; Joon Beom Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters.

Authors:  Sae Woong Choi; Woong Jin Bae; U-Syn Ha; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.