Literature DB >> 23219545

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with retrograde nephrostomy access: a forgotten technique revisited.

Sri Sivalingam1, Turki Al-Essawi, Denis Hosking.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We retrospectively assessed outcomes in a single institution series of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using retrograde nephrostomy access.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the records of 333 consecutive patients treated between May 2003 and July 2008. Measured variables included patient demographics, retrograde nephrostomy site, postoperative drainage, operative time, stone clearance rate and degree, requirement for secondary procedures, stone composition and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were included in study, including 162 females and 171 males with a median age of 56 years (range 17 to 87). Median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1 to 13). Antegrade access was required in 14 patients (4%) due to difficult or suboptimal anatomy. A nephrostomy tube was placed in 33 of 329 patients (10%), mainly for postoperative irrigation. Mean operative time was 76 minutes (range 25 to 246). Of the patients 79% achieved complete clearance, 19% had residual fragments 4 mm or less and 2% had significant persistent stones greater than 4 mm. Postoperatively 11 patients (3%) required shock wave lithotripsy. Analysis revealed calcium oxalate in 57% of stones, uric acid in 24%, struvite in 5% (infection stones) and other in 21%. Complications included 4 patients (1%) with significant postoperative hemorrhage, including angioembolization in 2, transfusion of 4 U packed red blood cells in 1 and observation in 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The retrograde technique to establish a percutaneous nephrostomy tract for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective with stone clearance and complication rates comparable to those of antegrade access.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219545     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Is tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy a feasible technique for the treatment of staghorn calculi?

Authors:  Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Hee Kim; Kwang Taek Kim; Tae Beom Kim; Khae Hawn Kim; Han Jung; Sang Jin Yoon; Jin Kyu Oh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-10-15

2.  Current trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an internet-based survey.

Authors:  Abd Alrahman Ahmad; Omar Alhunaidi; Mohamed Aziz; Mohamed Omar; Ahmed M Al-Kandari; Ahmed El-Nahas; Mohamed El-Shazly
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-08-15

3.  Retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a simple and safe technique.

Authors:  Khalid M Alotaibi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Seong Uk Jeh; Man Deuk Kim; Dong Hyuk Kang; Jong Kyou Kwon; Won Sik Ham; Young Deuk Choi; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Current Trends in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in China: A Spot Survey.

Authors:  Yuguang Jiang; Jiqing Zhang; Ning Kang; Yinong Niu; Zhiwen Li; Changlian Yu; Junhui Zhang
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-06-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.