Literature DB >> 24173168

In vitro and in vivo testing methods of epigenomic endpoints for evaluating endocrine disruptors.

John M Greally1, Miriam N Jacobs.   

Abstract

Epigenetic modulations underlie critical developmental processes and contribute to determining adult phenotype. Alterations to the phenotype, due to exposure to environmental insults during sensitive periods of development, are mediated through alterations in epigenetic programming in affected tissues. Originally prepared for the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), this detailed review evaluates the potential role of chemical-induced epigenetic modifications to endocrine signaling pathways during sensitive windows of exposure as a mechanism of endocrine disruption, along with the examination of potential methods for assessing such disruption. Potential targets of disruption along putative adverse outcome pathways associated with the signaling pathways are identified, along with assays that show promise in evaluating the target in a screening and testing program such that in vitro methods are used where possible, and animal experiments only where in vitro methods are not available. Monitoring such epigenetic marks in response to toxicant exposure may in future provide a valuable tool for predicting adverse outcomes, but a more robust basis for Test Guideline recommendations is still needed. Although there is evidence to suggest that epigenomic dysregulation might mediate effects of exposures to endocrine disruptors, it is uncertain as to whether these changes are truly predictive of adverse outcome(s). Adverse effects observed in the OECD transgenerational assays could be used to inform future tests specifically designed to investigate the epigenetic mechanism of action. Follow-up studies should include both an epigenetic as well as a genomic component to differentiate between the contributions of potentially compensatory mechanisms.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24173168     DOI: 10.14573/altex.2013.4.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  15 in total

Review 1.  A Tox21 Approach to Altered Epigenetic Landscapes: Assessing Epigenetic Toxicity Pathways Leading to Altered Gene Expression and Oncogenic Transformation In Vitro.

Authors:  Craig L Parfett; Daniel Desaulniers
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Associating cellular epigenetic models with human phenotypes.

Authors:  Tuuli Lappalainen; John M Greally
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

Review 4.  Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Daniel Desaulniers; Paule Vasseur; Abigail Jacobs; M Cecilia Aguila; Norman Ertych; Miriam N Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Toxicoepigenetics for Risk Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Basic and Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Anne Le Goff; Séverine Louvel; Henri Boullier; Patrick Allard
Journal:  Epigenet Insights       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 6.  Zebrafish as a model to study the role of DNA methylation in environmental toxicology.

Authors:  Jorke H Kamstra; Peter Aleström; Jan M Kooter; Juliette Legler
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Authors:  A C Gore; V A Chappell; S E Fenton; J A Flaws; A Nadal; G S Prins; J Toppari; R T Zoeller
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Global DNA Hypomethylation and Rassf1a and c-myc Promoter Hypermethylation in Rat Kidney Cells after Bisphenol A Exposure.

Authors:  Pınar TuzcuoĞlu; Sibel Özden
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-06-22

Review 9.  Environmentally induced epigenetic toxicity: potential public health concerns.

Authors:  Emma L Marczylo; Miriam N Jacobs; Timothy W Gant
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  Hypoxia causes transgenerational impairments in reproduction of fish.

Authors:  Simon Yuan Wang; Karen Lau; Keng-Po Lai; Jiang-Wen Zhang; Anna Chung-Kwan Tse; Jing-Woei Li; Yin Tong; Ting-Fung Chan; Chris Kong-Chu Wong; Jill Man-Ying Chiu; Doris Wai-Ting Au; Alice Sze-Tsai Wong; Richard Yuen-Chong Kong; Rudolf Shiu-Sun Wu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.