Literature DB >> 28587163

A Tox21 Approach to Altered Epigenetic Landscapes: Assessing Epigenetic Toxicity Pathways Leading to Altered Gene Expression and Oncogenic Transformation In Vitro.

Craig L Parfett1, Daniel Desaulniers2.   

Abstract

An emerging vision for toxicity testing in the 21st century foresees in vitro assays assuming the leading role in testing for chemical hazards, including testing for carcinogenicity. Toxicity will be determined by monitoring key steps in functionally validated molecular pathways, using tests designed to reveal chemically-induced perturbations that lead to adverse phenotypic endpoints in cultured human cells. Risk assessments would subsequently be derived from the causal in vitro endpoints and concentration vs. effect data extrapolated to human in vivo concentrations. Much direct experimental evidence now shows that disruption of epigenetic processes by chemicals is a carcinogenic mode of action that leads to altered gene functions playing causal roles in cancer initiation and progression. In assessing chemical safety, it would therefore be advantageous to consider an emerging class of carcinogens, the epigenotoxicants, with the ability to change chromatin and/or DNA marks by direct or indirect effects on the activities of enzymes (writers, erasers/editors, remodelers and readers) that convey the epigenetic information. Evidence is reviewed supporting a strategy for in vitro hazard identification of carcinogens that induce toxicity through disturbance of functional epigenetic pathways in human somatic cells, leading to inactivated tumour suppressor genes and carcinogenesis. In the context of human cell transformation models, these in vitro pathway measurements ensure high biological relevance to the apical endpoint of cancer. Four causal mechanisms participating in pathways to persistent epigenetic gene silencing were considered: covalent histone modification, nucleosome remodeling, non-coding RNA interaction and DNA methylation. Within these four interacting mechanisms, 25 epigenetic toxicity pathway components (SET1, MLL1, KDM5, G9A, SUV39H1, SETDB1, EZH2, JMJD3, CBX7, CBX8, BMI, SUZ12, HP1, MPP8, DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, TET1, MeCP2, SETDB2, BAZ2A, UHRF1, CTCF, HOTAIR and ANRIL) were found to have experimental evidence showing that functional perturbations played "driver" roles in human cellular transformation. Measurement of epigenotoxicants presents challenges for short-term carcinogenicity testing, especially in the high-throughput modes emphasized in the Tox21 chemicals testing approach. There is need to develop and validate in vitro tests to detect both, locus-specific, and genome-wide, epigenetic alterations with causal links to oncogenic cellular phenotypes. Some recent examples of cell-based high throughput chemical screening assays are presented that have been applied or have shown potential for application to epigenetic endpoints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; carcinogenesis; carcinogenicity tests; carcinogens; chemical safety; chromatin; environmental exposure; epigenesis; epigenomics; gene silencing; histones; neoplasms; nucleosomes; risk assessment; tumour suppressor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28587163      PMCID: PMC5486002          DOI: 10.3390/ijms18061179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


  334 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation.

Authors:  Amir Eden; François Gaudet; Alpana Waghmare; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Increasing role of UHRF1 in the reading and inheritance of the epigenetic code as well as in tumorogenesis.

Authors:  Christian Bronner; Mounira Krifa; Marc Mousli
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Frequent switching of Polycomb repressive marks and DNA hypermethylation in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line.

Authors:  Einav Nili Gal-Yam; Gerda Egger; Leo Iniguez; Heather Holster; Steingrímur Einarsson; Xinmin Zhang; Joy C Lin; Gangning Liang; Peter A Jones; Amos Tanay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Kaiso overexpression promotes intestinal inflammation and potentiates intestinal tumorigenesis in Apc(Min/+) mice.

Authors:  Christina C Pierre; Joseph Longo; Meaghan Mavor; Snezana B Milosavljevic; Roopali Chaudhary; Ebony Gilbreath; Clayton Yates; Juliet M Daniel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 5.  Reading the unique DNA methylation landscape of the brain: Non-CpG methylation, hydroxymethylation, and MeCP2.

Authors:  Benyam Kinde; Harrison W Gabel; Caitlin S Gilbert; Eric C Griffith; Michael E Greenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  H19 acts as a trans regulator of the imprinted gene network controlling growth in mice.

Authors:  Anne Gabory; Marie-Anne Ripoche; Anne Le Digarcher; Françoise Watrin; Ahmed Ziyyat; Thierry Forné; Hélène Jammes; Justin F X Ainscough; M Azim Surani; Laurent Journot; Luisa Dandolo
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  YB-1 transforms human mammary epithelial cells through chromatin remodeling leading to the development of basal-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Alastair H Davies; Kristen M Reipas; Mary Rose Pambid; Rachel Berns; Anna L Stratford; Abbas Fotovati; Natalie Firmino; Arezoo Astanehe; Kaiji Hu; Christopher Maxwell; Gordon B Mills; Sandra E Dunn
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Screening for inhibitors of an essential chromatin remodeler in mouse embryonic stem cells by monitoring transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Emily C Dykhuizen; Leigh C Carmody; Nicola Tolliday; Gerald R Crabtree; Michelle A J Palmer
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2012-08-01

Review 9.  Epigenetic plasticity: a central regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer.

Authors:  Upasana Bedi; Vivek Kumar Mishra; David Wasilewski; Christina Scheel; Steven A Johnsen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-04-30

10.  Molecular basis of histone tail recognition by human TIP5 PHD finger and bromodomain of the chromatin remodeling complex NoRC.

Authors:  Cynthia Tallant; Erica Valentini; Oleg Fedorov; Lois Overvoorde; Fleur M Ferguson; Panagis Filippakopoulos; Dmitri I Svergun; Stefan Knapp; Alessio Ciulli
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  10 in total

1.  Widespread epigenetic changes to the enhancer landscape of mouse liver induced by a specific xenobiotic agonist ligand of the nuclear receptor CAR.

Authors:  Andy Rampersaud; Nicholas J Lodato; Aram Shin; David J Waxman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Application of epigenetic data in human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Ila L Cote; Shaun D McCullough; Ronald N Hines; John J Vandenberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-06

3.  In Silico Approaches In Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Current Status and Future Needs.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Arianna Bassan; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Marc A Beal; Phillip Bellion; Romualdo Benigni; Jeffrey Birmingham; Alessandro Brigo; Frank Bringezu; Lidia Ceriani; Ian Crooks; Kevin Cross; Rosalie Elespuru; David M Faulkner; Marie C Fortin; Paul Fowler; Markus Frericks; Helga H J Gerets; Gloria D Jahnke; David R Jones; Naomi L Kruhlak; Elena Lo Piparo; Juan Lopez-Belmonte; Amarjit Luniwal; Alice Luu; Federica Madia; Serena Manganelli; Balasubramanian Manickam; Jordi Mestres; Amy L Mihalchik-Burhans; Louise Neilson; Arun Pandiri; Manuela Pavan; Cynthia V Rider; John P Rooney; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Karen H Watanabe-Sailor; Angela T White; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23

Review 4.  Ascorbate: antioxidant and biochemical activities and their importance for in vitro models.

Authors:  Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Daniel Desaulniers; Paule Vasseur; Abigail Jacobs; M Cecilia Aguila; Norman Ertych; Miriam N Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Toxicoepigenetics for Risk Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Basic and Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Anne Le Goff; Séverine Louvel; Henri Boullier; Patrick Allard
Journal:  Epigenet Insights       Date:  2022-07-15

7.  Tumor Microenvironment and Metabolism.

Authors:  Li V Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  A Genome Model to Explain Major Features of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Newborns.

Authors:  Bernard Friedenson
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2019-07-31

Review 9.  Differential expression of long non-coding RNAs as diagnostic markers for lung cancer and other malignant tumors.

Authors:  Li Li; Haitao Wei; Yi Wei Zhang; Shizhe Zhao; Guowei Che; Yun Wang; Longqi Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  The Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Relationship to the Hallmarks of Cancer, Relevant Biomarkers, and Assays to Measure Them.

Authors:  Martyn T Smith; Kathryn Z Guyton; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Alexandre Borrel; Andres Cardenas; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dean W Felsher; Catherine F Gibbons; William H Goodson; Keith A Houck; Agnes B Kane; Michele A La Merrill; Herve Lebrec; Leroy Lowe; Cliona M McHale; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Linda Rieswijk; Martha S Sandy; Hideko Sone; Amy Wang; Luoping Zhang; Lauren Zeise; Mark Fielden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.254

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.