Literature DB >> 24172184

A risk scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Thomas Lyles1, Alan Elliott, Don C Rockey.   

Abstract

GOALS: We aimed to develop a simple and practical risk scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in cirrhotics presenting with upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. STUDY: Extensive clinical data were captured in patients with documented cirrhosis who underwent endoscopic evaluation for upper GI bleeding between January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2011 at Parkland Memorial Hospital. Predictors of mortality were identified by multivariate regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 884 patients with cirrhosis admitted for upper GI bleeding were identified; 809 patients survived and 75 died (8.4%). The etiology of bleeding was similar in both groups, with bleeding attributed to esophageal varices in 59% of survivors and 60% of non-survivors (ulcer disease and other etiologies of bleeding accounted for the other causes of bleeding). Mortality was 8.6% and 8.3% in patients with variceal bleeding and nonvariceal bleeding, respectively. While survivors and those who died were similarly matched with regard to gender, age, ethnicity and etiology of cirrhosis, patients who died had lower systolic blood pressures, higher pulse rates and lower mean arterial pressures at admission than patients who survived. Non-survivors were more likely to be Childs C (61% vs. 19%, P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified the following 4 predictors of in-hospital mortality: use of vasoactive pressors, number of packed red blood cells transfused, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and serum albumin. A receiver operating characteristic curve including these 4 variables yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.98). Classification and Regression Tree analysis yielded similar results, identifying vasoactive pressors and then MELD>21 as the most important decision nodes for predicting death. By comparison, using the Rockall scoring system in the same patients, the AUROC curve was 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.76 and the comparison of the University of Texas Southwestern model to the Rockall model revealed P<0.0001). A validation set comprised of 150 unique admissions between July 1, 2011 and July 31, 2012, had an AUROC of 0.92, and the outcomes of 97% of the subjects in this set were accurately predicted by the risk score model.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of vasoactive agents, packed red blood cell transfusion, albumin, and MELD score were highly predictive of in-hospital mortality in cirrhotics presenting with upper GI bleeding. These variables were used to formulate a clinical risk scoring system for in-hospital mortality, which is available at: http://medweb.musc.edu/LogisticModelPredictor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24172184     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  18 in total

1.  Distinctive aspects of peptic ulcer disease, Dieulafoy's lesion, and Mallory-Weiss syndrome in patients with advanced alcoholic liver disease or cirrhosis.

Authors:  Borko Nojkov; Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Sanjay Chandnani; Pravin Rathi; Nikhil Sonthalia; Suhas Udgirkar; Shubham Jain; Qais Contractor; Samit Jain; Anupam Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-24

3.  Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Dennis L Shung; Benjamin Au; Richard Andrew Taylor; J Kenneth Tay; Stig B Laursen; Adrian J Stanley; Harry R Dalton; Jeffrey Ngu; Michael Schultz; Loren Laine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  qSOFA score not predictive of in-hospital mortality in emergency patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  M Müller; J C Schefold; A B Leichtle; D Srivastava; G Lindner; A K Exadaktylos; C A Pfortmueller
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  To transfuse or not to transfuse in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage? That is the question.

Authors:  Don C Rockey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  Portal hypertensive gastropathy and colopathy.

Authors:  Nathalie H Urrunaga; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.126

7.  Changing Epidemiology of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in the Last Decade: A Nationwide Analysis.

Authors:  Brandon A Wuerth; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dennis Shung; Michael Simonov; Mark Gentry; Benjamin Au; Loren Laine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients in Nile Delta.

Authors:  Mamdouh Ahmed Gabr; Mohamed Abd El-Raouf Tawfik; Abd Allah Ahmed El-Sawy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-17

10.  Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Cirrhosis-Etiology and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Khalifa; Don C Rockey
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.378

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.