Literature DB >> 31124017

Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.

Sanjay Chandnani1, Pravin Rathi2, Nikhil Sonthalia2, Suhas Udgirkar2, Shubham Jain2, Qais Contractor2, Samit Jain2, Anupam Kumar Singh3.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) characteristics and to validate the Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores (GBS), Progetto Nazionale Emorragica Digestiva (PNED) and albumin, international normalized ratio (INR), mental status, systolic blood pressure, and age > 65 (AIMS65) risk scores in predicting outcomes in patients with UGIB.
METHODS: Three hundred subjects with hematemesis and/or melena were prospectively enrolled and followed up for 30 days. All patients were assessed by hematological investigations, imaging, and endoscopy and risk scores were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean age was 43.5 ± 17.2 years, and 207 (69%) were males. Hematemesis was the most common presentation (94%). Variceal bleeding was the most common etiology (47.7%). Thirty patients died (10%) and 50 had rebleeding (16.7%). On univariate analysis, serum albumin ≤ 2.7 gm% (p = 0.008), Glasgow Coma scale ≤ 13.9 (p = 0.001), serum bilirubin > 3 mg/dL (p = 0.004), serum bicarbonate ≤ 15.7 mEq/L (p = 0.001), systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg (p = 0.004), and arterial pH ≤ 7.3 (p = 0.003) were found to be the predictors of mortality. No variable was found significant on multivariate analysis. All four scores were significant in predicting mortality, but Rockall (area under receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] 0.728) was better than others. Rebleeding was better predicted by PNED (modified) (AUROC 0.705). In predicting the need for transfusion and surgical or radiological intervention, GBS score > 0 was significant while score of < 2 classified patients into low risk for mortality with high negative predictive value.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the variceal bleeding was the commonest cause of UGIB. Rockall score was more significant in predicting mortality while PNED for rebleeding. Low risk for mortality, need for blood transfusion, or interventions were accurately predicted by GBS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; Non-variceal bleed; Risk scores; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Variceal bleed

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31124017     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-019-00951-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  31 in total

1.  Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  Katharina Dworzynski; Vicki Pollit; Amy Kelsey; Bernard Higgins; Kelvin Palmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Chang-Yuan Wang; Jian Qin; Jing Wang; Chang-Yi Sun; Tao Cao; Dan-Dan Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding.

Authors:  John R Saltzman; Ying P Tabak; Brian H Hyett; Xiaowu Sun; Anne C Travis; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  O Blatchford; W R Murray; M Blatchford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Anna Cherian Anchu; Subair Mohsina; Sathasivam Sureshkumar; T Mahalakshmy; Vikram Kate
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-10

6.  The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.

Authors:  Brian H Hyett; Marwan S Abougergi; Joseph P Charpentier; Navin L Kumar; Suzana Brozovic; Brian L Claggett; Anne C Travis; John R Saltzman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  [Validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Scoring System to predict mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital of Lima, Peru (June 2012-December 2013)].

Authors:  Alessandra Cassana; Silvia Scialom; Eddy R Segura; Alfonso Chacaltana
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Thirty-Day Readmission Among Patients With Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage and Effects on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marwan S Abougergi; Heather Peluso; John R Saltzman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Clinical Application of AIMS65 Scores to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ragesh Babu Thandassery; Manik Sharma; Anil K John; Khalid Mohsin Al-Ejji; Hamidulla Wani; Khaleel Sultan; Muneera Al-Mohannadi; Rafie Yakoob; Moutaz Derbala; Nazeeh Al-Dweik; Muhammed Tariq Butt; Saad Rashid Al-Kaabi
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Sung Min Park; Seok Cheon Yeum; Byung-Wook Kim; Joon Sung Kim; Ji Hee Kim; Eun Hui Sim; Jeong-Seon Ji; Hwang Choi
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.519

View more
  5 in total

1.  Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Which one scores better?

Authors:  Vinay Dhir; Rahul Shah
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04

2.  The Clinical Impact of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford Scores in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Susana Maia; Daniela Falcão; Joana Silva; Isabel Pedroto
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  A Comparative Analysis of Risk Scoring Systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed.

Authors:  Abhijnya K Renukaprasad; Srikanth Narayanaswamy; Vinay R
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-08

4.  The risk factors for the recurrent upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage among acute peptic ulcer disease patients in Syria: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sara Mona Bitar; Maen Moussa
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-15

5.  Prediction model of emergency mortality risk in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lan Chen; Han Zheng; Saibin Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.