OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of regional three-dimensional registration and superimposition methods for assessment of temporomandibular joint condylar morphology across subjects and longitudinally. METHODS: The sample consisted of cone beam CT scans of 36 patients. The across-subject comparisons included 12 controls, mean age 41.3 ± 12.0 years, and 12 patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, mean age 41.3 ± 14.7 years. The individual longitudinal assessments included 12 patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, mean age 37.8 ± 16.7 years, followed up at pre-operative jaw surgery, immediately after and one-year post-operative. Surface models of all condyles were constructed from the cone beam CT scans. Two previously calibrated observers independently performed all registration methods. A landmark-based approach was used for the registration of across-subject condylar models, and temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis vs control group differences were computed with shape analysis. A voxel-based approach was used for registration of longitudinal scans calculated x, y, z degrees of freedom for translation and rotation. Two-way random intraclass correlation coefficients tested the interobserver reliability. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the control group and the osteoarthritis group were consistently located on the lateral and medial poles for both observers. The interobserver differences were ≤0.2 mm. For individual longitudinal comparisons, the mean interobserver differences were ≤0.6 mm in translation errors and 1.2° in rotation errors, with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar registration for across-subjects and longitudinal assessments is reliable and can be used to quantify subtle bony differences in the three-dimensional condylar morphology.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of regional three-dimensional registration and superimposition methods for assessment of temporomandibular joint condylar morphology across subjects and longitudinally. METHODS: The sample consisted of cone beam CT scans of 36 patients. The across-subject comparisons included 12 controls, mean age 41.3 ± 12.0 years, and 12 patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, mean age 41.3 ± 14.7 years. The individual longitudinal assessments included 12 patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, mean age 37.8 ± 16.7 years, followed up at pre-operative jaw surgery, immediately after and one-year post-operative. Surface models of all condyles were constructed from the cone beam CT scans. Two previously calibrated observers independently performed all registration methods. A landmark-based approach was used for the registration of across-subject condylar models, and temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis vs control group differences were computed with shape analysis. A voxel-based approach was used for registration of longitudinal scans calculated x, y, z degrees of freedom for translation and rotation. Two-way random intraclass correlation coefficients tested the interobserver reliability. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the control group and the osteoarthritis group were consistently located on the lateral and medial poles for both observers. The interobserver differences were ≤0.2 mm. For individual longitudinal comparisons, the mean interobserver differences were ≤0.6 mm in translation errors and 1.2° in rotation errors, with excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar registration for across-subjects and longitudinal assessments is reliable and can be used to quantify subtle bony differences in the three-dimensional condylar morphology.
Authors: T Hayashi; J Ito; J Koyama; A Hinoki; F Kobayashi; Y Torikai; Y Hiruma Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 1999-07
Authors: Oana Bida Honey; William Charles Scarfe; Michael J Hilgers; Kathleen Klueber; Anibal M Silveira; Bruce S Haskell; Allan G Farman Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: L H S Cevidanes; A-K Hajati; B Paniagua; P F Lim; D G Walker; G Palconet; A G Nackley; M Styner; J B Ludlow; H Zhu; C Phillips Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2010-04-09
Authors: Liliane R Gomes; Marcelo Gomes; Bryan Jung; Beatriz Paniagua; Antonio C Ruellas; João Roberto Gonçalves; Martin A Styner; Larry Wolford; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2015-07-07
Authors: B Shoukri; J C Prieto; A Ruellas; M Yatabe; J Sugai; M Styner; H Zhu; C Huang; B Paniagua; S Aronovich; L Ashman; E Benavides; P de Dumast; N T Ribera; C Mirabel; L Michoud; Z Allohaibi; M Ioshida; L Bittencourt; L Fattori; L R Gomes; L Cevidanes Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: J T Zupnik; M Ioshida; M Yatabe; A C O Ruellas; L R Gomes; S Aronovich; E Benavides; S P Edwards; B Paniagua; L H S Cevidanes Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Beatriz Paniagua; Laura Pascal; Juan Prieto; Jean Baptiste Vimort; Liliane Gomes; Marilia Yatabe; Antonio Carlos Ruellas; Francois Budin; Steve Pieper; Martin Styner; Erika Benavides; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2017-03-13
Authors: L H S Cevidanes; D Walker; J Schilling; J Sugai; W Giannobile; B Paniagua; E Benavides; H Zhu; J S Marron; B T Jung; D Baranowski; J Rhodes; A Nackley; P F Lim; J B Ludlow; T Nguyen; J R Goncalves; L Wolford; S Kapila; M Styner Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: L R Gomes; L H Cevidanes; M R Gomes; A C Ruellas; D P Ryan; B Paniagua; L M Wolford; J R Gonçalves Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 2.789