| Literature DB >> 24168110 |
Hironori Betsunoh, Takehiko Fukuda, Naohiko Anzai, Daisaku Nishihara, Tomoya Mizuno, Hideo Yuki, Akinori Masuda, Yoshiyuki Yamaguchi, Hideyuki Abe, Masahiro Yashi, Yoshitatsu Fukabori, Ken-Ichiro Yoshida, Takao Kamai1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The system L amino acid transporter (LAT) has an important role in the transport of various amino acids, and there have been reports about the relation of this system to cancer. Although LATs are highly expressed in the kidneys, little is known about their influence on human renal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24168110 PMCID: PMC3832879 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Data collection of patient and tumor characteristics
| | No. of patients | 82 |
| | Age (yrs) | 63.1 (39–83) |
| | Sex (male / female) | 62 / 20 |
| | follow-up times (months) | 46 (3–112) |
| | | |
| | Histological grading (G1 /G 2 / G3 / G4) | 17 / 41 / 24 / 0 |
| | pT stage (T1 / T2 / T3 / T4) | 34 / 16 / 30 / 2 |
| | Microscopic vascular invasion (v0 / v1) | 49 / 33 |
| Metastasis (M0 / M1) | 60 / 22 |
Figure 1LATs mRNA expressions between tumor and non-tumor tissues in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma. a; LAT1, b; LAT2, c; LAT3, d; LAT4, e; 4F2hc. The data show the 95% confidential interval.
Figure 2LAT1 mRNAs in tumors. a; grade. b; pT stage. c; microscopic vascular invasion. d; metastasis. The data show the 95% confidential interval.
Quantitative PCR measurements of LATs mRNAs and pS6K protein densitometry results
| | | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Tissue | tumor | n = 82 | 1.78 ± 3.95 | < 0.0001 | 0.14 ± 0.72 | < 0.0001 | 0.32 ± 0.31 | < 0.0001 | 0.79 ± 0.53 | 0.2199 | 0.55 ± 0.39 | 0.1496 | n = 18 | 3.03 ± 1.91 | 3.03 ± 1.91 |
| non-tumor | n = 82 | 0.42 ± 1.36 | 0.74 ± 0.76 | 0.69 ± 0.55 | 0.87 ± 0.53 | 0.81 ± 0.85 | n = 18 | 1.27 ± 0.37 | |||||||
| Grade | G1 | n = 17 | 1.56 ± 2.33 | 0.0023 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | | 0.29 ± 0.29 | 0.6275 | 0.87 ± 0.45 | 0.1214 | 0.62 ± 0.38 | 0.6340 | n = 3 | 3.84 ± 2.25 | 0.3596 |
| G2 | n = 41 | 1.36 ± 4.61 | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 0.9112 | 0.35 ± 0.36 | 0.90 ± 0.59 | 0.55 ± 0.38 | n = 9 | 2.63 ± 1.66 | ||||||
| G3 | n = 24 | 2.75 ± 3.18 | 0.34 ± 1.32 | | 0.30 ± 0.20 | 0.55 ± 0.36 | 0.54 ± 0.43 | n = 6 | 4.27 ± 1.99 | ||||||
| pT stage | pT1-2 | n = 50 | 0.85 ± 1.58 | 0.0004 | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.556 | 0.34 ± 0.36 | 0.9583 | 0.85 ± 0.55 | 0.1103 | 0.54 ± 0.37 | 09280 | n = 10 | 2.48 ± 1.12 | 0.0849 |
| | pT3-4 | n = 32 | 3.24 ± 5.76 | 0.28 ± 1.15 | 0.30 ± 0.20 | 0.68 ± 0.47 | 0.57 ± 0.43 | n = 8 | 3.64 ± 2.21 | ||||||
| Microscopic vascular invasion | v0 | n = 49 | 0.88 ± 1.60 | 0.0012 | 0.06 ± 0.06 | 0.7122 | 0.31 ± 0.34 | 0.3869 | 0.79 ± 0.50 | 0.6330 | 0.55 ± 0.40 | 0.9582 | n = 10 | 2.77 ± 1.12 | 0.2087 |
| v1 | n = 33 | 3.11 ± 5.70 | 0.27 ± 1.13 | 0.35 ± 0.26 | 0.78 ± 0.57 | 0.55 ± 0.39 | n = 8 | 3.66 ± 2.33 | |||||||
| Metastasis | M0 | n = 60 | 1.73 ± 4.34 | 0.0462 | 0.08 ± 0.13 | 0.5461 | 0.34 ± 0.22 | 0.4314 | 0.83 ± 0.53 | 0.6125 | 0.58 ± 0.29 | 0.3429 | n = 9 | 2.11 ± 1.24 | 0.0083 |
| M1 | n = 22 | 2.02 ± 2.69 | 0.17 ± 0.84 | 0.32 ± 0.33 | 0.78 ± 0.53 | 0.55 ± 0.42 | n = 9 | 3.84 ± 2.05 | |||||||
Data show mean ± S.D.
Figure 3Expression of phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/236) (32 kDa) and beta actin (42 kDa) proteins in the primary tumor tissues using Western blotting. M; marker. N; non-tumor tissue. T; primary tumor tissue with metastatic lesions. Each number corresponds to a case number.
Figure 4Expression of phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/236). a; tumor. b; grade. c; pT stage. d; microscopic vascular invasion. e; metastasis. The data show the 95% confidential interval.
Figure 5Spearman rank correlation coefficient relationship. X axis is an independent variable. Y axis is a dependent variable. LAT1 mRNA levels positively correlated with phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/236) levels in primary tumor tissues.
Figure 6Survival curve based on the median values of mRNA expression of LATs in tumors, the cases were divided into two groups at this levels high and low expression. a; LAT1, b; LAT2, c; LAT3, d; LAT4, e; 4F2hc.
Cox regression analysis for various potential prognostic factors in survival
| | | | Univariate (U) | 6.080 | 2.799 - 13.209 | < 0.0001 |
| 3 / 2 / 1 | 21 / 33 / 17 | | | | | |
| | | | Multivariate (M) | 1.693 | 0.838 - 3.424 | 0.1424 |
| | | | U | 41.532 | 5.598 - 308.114 | < 0.0001 |
| 4,3 / 2,1 | 43 / 28 | | | | | |
| | | | M | 9.21 | 0.897 - 94.539 | 0.0616 |
| | | | U | 9.981 | 3.407 - 29.245 | < 0.0001 |
| (+) / (−) | 43 / 28 | | | | | |
| | | | M | 1.548 | 0.423 - 5.674 | 0.5093 |
| | | | U | 12.098 | 4.927 - 29.709 | < 0.0001 |
| (+) / (−) | 18 / 53 | | | | | |
| | | | M | 3.222 | 1.231 - 8.434 | 0.0172 |
| | | | U | 4.625 | 1.724 - 12.407 | 0.0023 |
| high / low | 41 / 41 | | | | | |
| M | 1.977 | 0.635 - 6.150 | 0.2393 | |||