Literature DB >> 26379872

Microvascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hai Huang1, Xiu-Wu Pan1, Yi Huang1, Dan-Feng Xu2, Xin-Gang Cui3, Lin Li1, Yi Hong1, Lu Chen1, Yi Gao1, Lei Yin1.   

Abstract

Microvascular invasion (MVI), an omen of potential hematogenous spread of tumor cells, has been identified as an accepted risk factor for poor prognosis in some solid tumors. But its prognostic value in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains disputable. In order to address this question rigorously, we performed a systematical review of the published literature on MVI and RCC prognosis. According to the PRISMA statement, we searched PubMed, Web of science, and Cochrane Library database and identified 33 cohort articles that met the eligibility criteria and involved 14,946 patients (48-2596 per study) in this meta-analysis. Using the random effects model, the association between MVI and four generally recognized end points were estimated, including cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). The presence of MVI was detected in 14.4% of the pathological specimens. A higher incidence of MVI was associated with some acknowledged prognostic risk factors such as higher pathological TNM stages and higher tumor grades. Statistical significance of the combined hazard ratio (HR) was detected for CSS (HR, 2.090; 95% CI, 1.530-2.857), RFS (HR = 2.749; 95% CI, 1.974-3.828), MFS (HR = 1.621; 95% CI, 1.095-2.400). However, the association between MVI and worse overall survival did not address statistical significance (HR = 1.371; 95% CI, 0.978-1.923). These findings suggest that the presence of MVI has a detrimental effect on clinicopathological features of RCC and could serve as a poor prognostic factor for patient with RCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microvascular invasion; meta-analysis; prognosis; renal cell carcinoma; systematic review

Year:  2015        PMID: 26379872      PMCID: PMC4565255     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  51 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Kattan postoperative nomogram for renal cell carcinoma: predictive accuracy in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Kazuya Suzuki; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Noboru Hara; Kohei Akazawa; Kota Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Characteristics of aggressive variants in T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Takayama; Takayuki Sugiyama; Fumitake Kai; Takahisa Suzuki; Masahiro Nagata; Takeshi Imanishi; Takuji Mizuno; Shigenori Sato; Hiroshi Furuse; Soichi Mugiya; Seiichiro Ozono
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Lymphatic metastasis in the absence of functional intratumor lymphatics.

Authors:  Timothy P Padera; Ananth Kadambi; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Carla Mouta Carreira; Edward B Brown; Yves Boucher; Noah C Choi; Douglas Mathisen; John Wain; Eugene J Mark; Lance L Munn; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Lymphovascular invasion in clear cell renal cell carcinoma--association with disease-free and cancer-specific survival.

Authors:  Michael Belsante; Oussama Darwish; Ramy Youssef; Aditya Bagrodia; Payal Kapur; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathan M Mollberg; Carrie Bennette; Eric Howell; Leah Backhus; Beth Devine; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Validation of a postoperative prognostic model consisting of tumor microvascular invasion, size, and grade to predict disease-free and cancer-specific survival of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias May; Sabine Brookman-Amissah; Friederike Kendel; Nina Knoll; Jan Roigas; Bernd Hoschke; Kurt Miller; Christian Gilfrich; Sandra Pflanz; Oliver Gralla
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.369

8.  Fatty acid synthase over expression is an indicator of tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Akio Horiguchi; Tomohiko Asano; Takako Asano; Keiichi Ito; Makoto Sumitomo; Masamichi Hayakawa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The role of lymphovascular space invasion in renal cell carcinoma as a prognostic marker of survival after curative resection.

Authors:  Matthew D Katz; Maria F Serrano; Peter A Humphrey; Robert L Grubb; Ted A Skolarus; Feng Gao; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jayne F Tierney; Lesley A Stewart; Davina Ghersi; Sarah Burdett; Matthew R Sydes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Recurrence in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Data.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Speed; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Toni K Choueiri; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Prognostic factors and prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma: a literature review.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Sabrina H Rossi; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Arterial Spin Labeling MRI for Predicting Microvascular Invasion of T1 Staging Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Preoperatively.

Authors:  Han-Mei Zhang; Da-Guang Wen; Yi Wang; Yi-Ge Bao; Yuan Yuan; Yun-Tian Chen; Bin Song
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Differences in circulating γδ T cells in patients with primary colon cancer and relation with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Andreu-Ballester; Lorena Galindo-Regal; Julia Hidalgo-Coloma; Carmen Cuéllar; Carlos García-Ballesteros; Carolina Hurtado; Natalia Uribe; María Del Carmen Martín; Ana Isabel Jiménez; Francisca López-Chuliá; Antonio Llombart-Cussac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A simple prognostic score system predicts the prognosis of solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Shen; Chuan Li; Tian-Fu Wen; Lv-Nan Yan; Bo Li; Wen-Tao Wang; Jia-Yin Yang; Ming-Qing Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Evaluation of microvascular invasion as a prognostic factor in the progression of non-metastatic renal cancer.

Authors:  Rubén G Bengió; Leandro Cristian Arribillaga; Javier Epelde; Sergio Orellana; Ariel Montedoro; Verónica Bengió; Esteban Cordero; Matías Guevara
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-10-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.