Literature DB >> 24165903

Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted.

Amanda Holmes1, Karin Mogg, Jan de Fockert, Maria Kragh Nielsen, Brendan P Bradley.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the time course of attentional bias for threat-related (angry) facial expressions under conditions of high versus low cognitive (working memory) load. Event-related potential (ERP) and reaction time (RT) data were recorded while participants viewed pairs of faces (angry paired with neutral face) displayed for 500 ms and followed by a probe. Participants were required to respond to the probe while performing a concurrent task of holding in working memory a sequence of digits that were either in the same order (low memory load) or in a random mixed order (high memory load). The ERP results revealed that higher working memory load resulted in enhanced lateralized neural responses to threatening relative to neutral faces, consistent with greater initial orienting of attention to threatening faces (early N2pc: 180-252 ms) and enhanced maintenance of processing representations of threat (late N2pc, 252-320 ms; SPCN, 320-500 ms). The ERP indices showed significant positive relationships with each other, and also with the behavioral index of attentional bias to threat (reflected by faster RTs to probes replacing angry than neutral faces at 500 ms), although the latter index was not significantly influenced by memory load. Overall, the findings indicate that depletion of cognitive control resources, using a working memory manipulation, increases the capacity of task-irrelevant threat cues to capture and hold attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24165903     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  40 in total

Review 1.  The amygdala: vigilance and emotion.

Authors:  M Davis; P J Whalen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

3.  Tuning down the emotional brain: an fMRI study of the effects of cognitive load on the processing of affective images.

Authors:  Lotte F Van Dillen; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Sander L Koole
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

Review 5.  Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety.

Authors:  K Mogg; B P Bradley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-09

9.  Attentional selectivity for emotional faces: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Amanda Holmes; Brendan P Bradley; Maria Kragh Nielsen; Karin Mogg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of task-irrelevant threatening stimuli on orienting- and executive attentional processes under cognitive load.

Authors:  Andras N Zsidó; Diana T Stecina; Rebecca Cseh; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-11-12

Review 2.  Attention Bias Modification (ABM): Review of Effects of Multisession ABM Training on Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention in High-Anxious Individuals.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Allison M Waters; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  Facial Expression Related vMMN: Disentangling Emotional from Neutral Change Detection.

Authors:  Klara Kovarski; Marianne Latinus; Judith Charpentier; Helen Cléry; Sylvie Roux; Emmanuelle Houy-Durand; Agathe Saby; Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault; Magali Batty; Marie Gomot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Effect of Cognitive Control on Age-Related Positivity Effects in Attentional Processing - Evidence From an Event-Related Brain Potential Study.

Authors:  Haining Liu; Yanli Liu; Xianling Dong; Haihong Liu; Buxin Han
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Emotion Unchained: Facial Expression Modulates Gaze Cueing under Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Anna Pecchinenda; Manuel Petrucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Examination Stress Results in Attentional Bias and Altered Neural Reactivity in Test-Anxious Individuals.

Authors:  Xiaocong Zhang; Yunying Dong; Renlai Zhou
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  The relations among worry, meta-worry, intolerance of uncertainty and attentional bias for threat in men at high risk for generalized anxiety disorder: a network analysis.

Authors:  Lei Ren; Zhou Yang; Yidi Wang; Long-Biao Cui; Yinchuan Jin; Zhujing Ma; Qintao Zhang; Zhongying Wu; Hua-Ning Wang; Qun Yang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  FEF Excitability in Attentional Bias: A TMS-EEG Study.

Authors:  Sara Torriero; Giulia Mattavelli; Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Leonor Romero Lauro; Rossana Actis-Grosso; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Local context influences memory for emotional stimuli but not electrophysiological markers of emotion-dependent attention.

Authors:  Gemma E Barnacle; Dimitris Tsivilis; Alexandre Schaefer; Deborah Talmi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.