INTRODUCTION: Emergency laparotomy is a common procedure, with 30,000-50,000 performed annually in the UK. This large scale study reports the current spectrum of emergency laparotomies, and the influence of the surgical procedure, underlying pathology and subspecialty of the operating surgeon on mortality. METHODS: Anonymised data on consecutive patients undergoing an emergency laparotomy were submitted for a three-month period. The primary outcome measure was unadjusted 30-day mortality. Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy were among the procedures excluded. RESULTS: Data from 1,708 patients from 35 National Health Service hospitals were analysed. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 14.8%. 'True' emergency laparotomies (ie those classified by the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death as immediate or urgent) comprised 86.5% of cases. The mortality rate rose from 8.0% among expedited cases to 14.3% among urgent cases and to 25.7% among laparotomies termed immediate. Among the most common index procedures, small bowel resection exhibited the highest 30-day mortality rate of 21.1%. The presence of abdominal sepsis was associated with raised 30-day mortality (17.5% in the presence of sepsis vs 12.6%, p=0.027). Colorectal procedures comprised 44.3% and within this group, data suggest that mortality from laparotomy may be influenced by surgical subspecialisation. CONCLUSIONS: This report of a large number of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in the UK confirms a remarkably high mortality by modern standards across the range. Very few pathologies or procedures can be considered anything other than high risk. The need for routine consultant involvement and critical care is evident, and the case distribution helps define the surgical skill set needed for a modern emergency laparotomy service. Preliminary data relating outcomes from emergency colonic surgery to surgical subspecialty require urgent further study.
INTRODUCTION: Emergency laparotomy is a common procedure, with 30,000-50,000 performed annually in the UK. This large scale study reports the current spectrum of emergency laparotomies, and the influence of the surgical procedure, underlying pathology and subspecialty of the operating surgeon on mortality. METHODS: Anonymised data on consecutive patients undergoing an emergency laparotomy were submitted for a three-month period. The primary outcome measure was unadjusted 30-day mortality. Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy were among the procedures excluded. RESULTS: Data from 1,708 patients from 35 National Health Service hospitals were analysed. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 14.8%. 'True' emergency laparotomies (ie those classified by the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death as immediate or urgent) comprised 86.5% of cases. The mortality rate rose from 8.0% among expedited cases to 14.3% among urgent cases and to 25.7% among laparotomies termed immediate. Among the most common index procedures, small bowel resection exhibited the highest 30-day mortality rate of 21.1%. The presence of abdominal sepsis was associated with raised 30-day mortality (17.5% in the presence of sepsis vs 12.6%, p=0.027). Colorectal procedures comprised 44.3% and within this group, data suggest that mortality from laparotomy may be influenced by surgical subspecialisation. CONCLUSIONS: This report of a large number of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in the UK confirms a remarkably high mortality by modern standards across the range. Very few pathologies or procedures can be considered anything other than high risk. The need for routine consultant involvement and critical care is evident, and the case distribution helps define the surgical skill set needed for a modern emergency laparotomy service. Preliminary data relating outcomes from emergency colonic surgery to surgical subspecialty require urgent further study.
Authors: Sherif Awad; Philip J J Herrod; Rachel Palmer; Hyun-Mi Carty; John F Abercrombie; Adam Brooks; Thearina de Beer; Jonathan Mole; Dileep N Lobo Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Omar Faiz; Janindra Warusavitarne; Alex Bottle; Paris P Tekkis; Sue K Clark; Ara W Darzi; Paul Aylin Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Mohammed H Al-Temimi; Matthew Griffee; Toby M Enniss; Robert Preston; Daniel Vargo; Sean Overton; Edward Kimball; Richard Barton; Raminder Nirula Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: R J Egan; T Abdelrahman; S Tate; J Ansell; R Harries; L Davies; Gwb Clark; W G Lewis Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Anders Winther Voldby; Anders Watt Boolsen; Anne Albers Aaen; Jakob Burcharth; Sarah Ekeløf; Roberto Loprete; Simon Jønck; Hassan Ali Eskandarani; Lau Caspar Thygesen; Ann Merete Møller; Birgitte Brandstrup Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: A E Sharrock; V J Gokani; R L Harries; L Pearce; S R Smith; O Ali; H Chu; A Dubois; H Ferguson; G Humm; M Marsden; D Nepogodiev; M Venn; S Singh; C Swain; J Kirkby-Bott Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 5.469