Literature DB >> 22493955

Incidence and estimated annual cost of emergency laparotomy in England: is there a major funding shortfall?.

S L Shapter1, M J Paul, S M White.   

Abstract

Significant recent interest has focussed on improving outcomes after emergency laparotomy. This retrospective database analysis estimated the annual incidence and associated inpatient costs of emergency laparotomy in England. Demographic, process and outcome data were collected for all patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Brighton for two calendar years (2009-2010). Cost analysis assumed £16 per minute theatre time, and £282 per day ward bed and £1382 per day critical care bed costs. National incidence was confirmed from Hospital Episode Statistics and Office of National Statistics mid-year population data. In total, 768 patients underwent 850 emergency laparotomies. The incidence of emergency laparotomy was estimated as ∼1:1100 population. Thirty-six percent (276 patients) were admitted for a median (IQR [range]) of 5 (3-11 [1-76]) days of critical care. Postoperative median (IQR [range]) length of stay was 13 (8-24 [1-176]) days. Our estimated annual inpatient cost of emergency laparotomy for Brighton was ∼£5 million, equivalent to ∼£13 000 per patient, and for England, an annual estimated cost of ∼£650 million. However, 'Payment by Results' reimbursement amounted to a mean (SD) hospital income of just £6905 (2639) per patient, a net financial loss of ∼£6100 per patient, equivalent to a reimbursement shortfall nationally of ∼£300 million. We also found that patients > 70 years (46%) had significantly higher 30-day postoperative mortality (18% vs 6%, p < 0.0001), significantly prolonged median (IQR [range]) length of stay (15 (10-26 [1-123]) days vs 12 (7-22 [1-176]) days, p < 0.001) and incurred higher costs (median (IQR [range]) £9667 (6620-15 732 [1920-103 624]) vs £7467 (4975-14 251 [1178-118 060]), p < 0.001). Emergency laparotomy is a common procedure associated with considerable cost, particularly among elderly patients. A National Emergency Laparotomy Database will help provide an evidence base on which to improve clinical outcome and cost efficiency. Anaesthesia
© 2012 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493955     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  18 in total

1.  Survival After Emergency General Surgery: What can We Learn from Enhanced Recovery Programmes?

Authors:  N Quiney; G Aggarwal; M Scott; M Dickinson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Current outcomes of emergency large bowel surgery.

Authors:  H J Ng; M Yule; M Twoon; N R Binnie; E H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  30-Day and 1-year mortality in emergency general surgery laparotomies: an area of concern and need for improvement?

Authors:  D G Watt; M S J Wilson; O C Shapter; Pradeep Patil
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Decision-Making in the Emergency Laparotomy: A Mixed Methodology Study.

Authors:  Louise Hendra; Tim Hendra; Stephen J Parker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Impact of laparoscopic approach in emergency major abdominal surgery: single-centre analysis of 748 consecutive cases.

Authors:  P H Pucher; N C Carter; B C Knight; Skc Toh; V Tucker; S J Mercer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging of suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  N D'Souza; M Marsden; S Bottomley; N Nagarajah; F Scutt; S Toh
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Outcomes of Emergency Laparotomy (EL) Care Protocol at Tertiary Care Center from Low-Middle-Income Country (LMIC).

Authors:  Nitin Vashistha; Dinesh Singhal; Sandeep Budhiraja; Bharat Aggarwal; Raj Tobin; Kamal Fotedar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Pre-NELA vs NELA - has anything changed, or is it just an audit exercise?

Authors:  M Mak; A R Hakeem; V Chitre
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Are we selecting appropriate admissions for intensive care following major abdominal surgery: A retrospective cohort study on outcomes of 1059 patients.

Authors:  Jeremy P Batt; Rosie C Vincent
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2021-03-27

10.  Current UK practice in emergency laparotomy.

Authors:  E Barrow; I D Anderson; S Varley; A C Pichel; C J Peden; D I Saunders; D Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.