Literature DB >> 24165299

Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.

Tom Francart1, Hugh J McDermott.   

Abstract

The addition of acoustic stimulation to electric stimulation via a cochlear implant has been shown to be advantageous for speech perception in noise, sound quality, music perception, and sound source localization. However, the signal processing and fitting procedures of current cochlear implants and hearing aids were developed independently, precluding several potential advantages of bimodal stimulation, such as improved sound source localization and binaural unmasking of speech in noise. While there is a large and increasing population of implantees who use a hearing aid, there are currently no generally accepted fitting methods for this configuration. It is not practical to fit current commercial devices to achieve optimal binaural loudness balance or optimal binaural cue transmission for arbitrary signals and levels. There are several promising experimental signal processing systems specifically designed for bimodal stimulation. In this article, basic psychophysical studies with electric acoustic stimulation are reviewed, along with the current state of the art in fitting, and experimental signal processing techniques for electric acoustic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24165299     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d14cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

3.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Justin T Fleming; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Huajun Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Investigating interaural frequency-place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration.

Authors:  François Guérit; Sébastien Santurette; Josef Chalupper; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type.

Authors:  Elke M J Devocht; A Miranda L Janssen; Josef Chalupper; Robert J Stokroos; Erwin L J George
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.

Authors:  Elke M J Devocht; A Miranda L Janssen; Josef Chalupper; Robert J Stokroos; Erwin L J George
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Hugh McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Dimitar Spirrov; Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Lieselot Van Deun; Tom Francart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.