Literature DB >> 24163223

The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.

Claragh Healy1, Robert J Allen2.   

Abstract

It is over 20 years since the inaugural deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. We review the type of flap utilized and indications in 2,850 microvascular breast reconstruction over the subsequent 20 years in the senior author's practice (Robert J. Allen). Data were extracted from a personal logbook of all microsurgical free flap breast reconstructions performed between August 1992 and August 2012. Indication for surgery; mastectomy pattern in primary reconstruction; flap type, whether unilateral or bilateral; recipient vessels; and adjunctive procedures were recorded. The DIEP was the most commonly performed flap (66%), followed by the superior gluteal artery perforator flap (12%), superficial inferior epigastric artery perforator flap (9%), inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (6%), profunda artery perforator flap (3%), and transverse upper gracilis flap (3%). Primary reconstruction accounted for 1,430 flaps (50%), secondary 992 (35%), and tertiary 425 (15%). As simultaneous bilateral reconstructions, 59% flaps were performed. With each flap, there typically ensues a period of enthusiasm which translated into surge in flap numbers. However, each flap has its own nuances and characteristics that influence patient and physician choice. Of note, each newly introduced flap, either buttock or thigh, results in a sharp decline in its predecessor. In this practice, the DIEP flap has remained the first choice in autologous breast reconstruction. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24163223     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  35 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Biofabrication of thick vascularized neo-pedicle flaps for reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Chelsea J Stephens; Jason A Spector; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Super obesity is not necessarily a contraindication to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Marios Papadakis; Frauke Schuster; Gabriel Djedovic; Afshin Rahmanian-Schwarz
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-24

4.  Conservative mastectomies and Immediate-DElayed AutoLogous (IDEAL) breast reconstruction: the DIEP flap.

Authors:  Maximilian Otte; Carolin Nestle-Krämling; Sonia Fertsch; Mazen Hagouan; Beatrix Munder; Philip Richrath; Peter Stambera; Alina Abu-Ghazaleh; Christoph Andree
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 5.  Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

6.  The Use of Semi-Absorbable Mesh and its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  L C Siegwart; L Sieber; S Fischer; Y Diehm; C Hirche; U Kneser; D Kotsougiani-Fischer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Indocyanine green-based fluorescent angiography in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew Griffiths; Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

8.  Genetically modified lentiviruses that preserve microvascular function protect against late radiation damage in normal tissues.

Authors:  Aadil A Khan; James T Paget; Martin McLaughlin; Joan N Kyula; Michelle J Wilkinson; Timothy Pencavel; David Mansfield; Victoria Roulstone; Rohit Seth; Martin Halle; Navita Somaiah; Jessica K R Boult; Simon P Robinson; Hardev S Pandha; Richard G Vile; Alan A Melcher; Paul A Harris; Kevin J Harrington
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 9.  Is Pregnancy Following a TRAM or DIEP Flap Safe? A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ao Fu; Chunjun Liu
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  [Muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator for breast reconstruction].

Authors:  Dajiang Song; Zan Li; Xiao Zhou; Yixin Zhang; Guang Feng; Bo Zhou; Chunliu Lü; Peng Wu; Yuanyuan Tang; Liang Yi; Zhenhua Luo
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.