Literature DB >> 33998215

[Muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator for breast reconstruction].

Dajiang Song1, Zan Li1, Xiao Zhou1, Yixin Zhang2, Guang Feng3, Bo Zhou1, Chunliu Lü1, Peng Wu1, Yuanyuan Tang1, Liang Yi1, Zhenhua Luo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the surgical technique, effectiveness, and safety of muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator for breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Between December 2016 and February 2019, 6 cases of early breast cancer received modified radical surgery, lower abdominal flap was applied for one- or two-staged breast reconstruction. The average age of the patients was 34.6 years (range, 29-56 years). The disease duration ranged from 2 to 16 months, with an average of 9.5 months. The tumor was located in the upper outer quadrant in 4 cases and the lower outer quadrant in 2 cases. Pathological examination showed that they were all invasive ductal carcinoma. Four cases of breast cancer were in stage Ⅰ and 2 cases was in stage Ⅱ. During operation, the inferior epigastric artery perforators were found to be close to the upper edge of the flap and/or near the umbilical cord in 4 cases, the inferior epigastric artery perforator vessels were relatively small (<0.3 mm) in 2 cases; and the breast was reconstructed with muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator. The length, width, and thickness of the flap were (28.9±0.2), (12.1±0.4), and (4.4±0.3) cm, respectively. The length of the vascular pedicle was (11.5±0.2) cm and the weight of the flap was (420.5±32.7) g.
RESULTS: All 6 muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps were successful, and the breast incisions healed by first intention. There was no vascular crisis, donor site effusion, hematoma, or infection. All 6 patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 26.8 months). The reconstructed breast had a good shape, good elasticity, and no flap contracture or deformation; only linear scars left at the donor site of the flap, and the abdominal wall function was not affected. During follow-up, there was no breast cancer recurrence and metastasis.
CONCLUSION: When the inferior epigastric artery perforators are too close to the upper edge of the flap and/or near the umbilical cord, the vascularity of lower abdominal flap can be ruined, harvested in form of muscle-sparing rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vascularized with intercostal artery perforator and inferior epigastric artery perforator can efficiently ensure blood supply safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inferior epigastric artery perforator; breast reconstruction; free flap; intercostal artery perforator

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33998215      PMCID: PMC8175202          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202011020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  8 in total

1.  Clinical outcome of abdominal wall after DIEP flap harvesting and immediate application of abdominoplasty techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Gustavo Sturtz; Eduardo Montag; Eduardo Gustavo Arruda; Cláudia Aldrighi; Rolf Gemperli; Marcus Castro Ferreira
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.

Authors:  Claragh Healy; Robert J Allen
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 3.  Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall.

Authors:  W M Rozen; T M N Tran; M W Ashton; M J Barrington; J J Ivanusic; G I Taylor
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle.

Authors:  I Koshima; S Soeda
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1989-11

5.  Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  R J Allen; P Treece
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Paraumbilical perforator flap without deep inferior epigastric vessels.

Authors:  I Koshima; K Inagawa; K Urushibara; T Moriguchi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  A theoretical model describing arterial flow in the DIEP flap related to number and size of perforator vessels.

Authors:  Sameer A Patel; Alex Keller
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  The impact of perforator number on deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ritwik Grover; Jonas A Nelson; John P Fischer; Stephen J Kovach; Joseph M Serletti; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.