Literature DB >> 24162139

Laparoscopic versus open elective repair of primary umbilical hernias: short-term outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program.

Scott Cassie1, Allan Okrainec, Fady Saleh, Fayez S Quereshy, Timothy D Jackson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 175,000 umbilical hernia repairs are performed annually in the US. Controversy exists regarding the optimal approach for the elective repair of primary umbilical hernias.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare 30-day outcomes of elective primary open (OHR) and laparoscopic (LHR) umbilical hernia repairs, using a prospectively collected dataset.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files during 2009 and 2010. Current Procedural Terminology and post-operative International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes were used to identify primary umbilical hernia repairs. Primary outcomes included composite endpoints of 30-day mortality, and major and overall complications. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed controlling for relevant patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included operative time and hospital length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Overall, 14,652 patients were identified-13,109 (89.5 %) OHR and 1543 (10.5 %) LHR. Univariate analyses of primary outcomes demonstrated similar 30-day morbidity and mortality between groups. In our multivariate model, however, after controlling for body mass index, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the odds ratio (OR) for overall complications favored LHR (OR 0.60; p = 0.01). This difference was driven primarily by the reduced wound complication rate in the LHR group [OR 0.41 (0.20, 0.78); p = 0.005]. LHR was associated with significantly longer operative time [57.7 min (SD 32.6) vs. 38.3 min (SD 22.9); p < 0.001], longer LOS [0.29 days (SD 0.68) vs. 0.17 days (SD 1.47); p = 0.001], and an increased rate of respiratory (0.52 vs. 0.10 %; p < 0.001) and cardiac (0.26 vs. 0.05 %; p = 0.005) complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential decreased total and wound morbidity associated with LHR for elective primary umbilical hernia repairs at the expense of increased operative time, LOS, and respiratory and cardiac complications. These results should be considered within the context of a retrospective study with its inherent risks of bias and limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24162139     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3252-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

Review 1.  Umbilical hernia in adults.

Authors:  H Lau; N G Patil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A retrospective audit comparing outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair of umbilical/paraumbilical herniae.

Authors:  T A Solomon; Padma Wignesvaran; Mohammed A Chaudry; Matthew G Tutton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair?

Authors:  Byron E Wright; Jason Beckerman; Melissa Cohen; John K Cumming; Jorge L Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy.

Authors:  Kimberly J O'Malley; Karon F Cook; Matt D Price; Kimberly Raiford Wildes; John F Hurdle; Carol M Ashton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Predictors of poor outcomes in functionally dependent patients undergoing ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Drew Reynolds; Daniel Davenport; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; T Bisgaard; S Assaadzadeh; L Nannestad Jorgensen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; P Poornoroozy; L N Jørgensen; B Jacobsen; H U Friis-Andersen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is the preferred approach in obese patients.

Authors:  Modesto J Colon; Riley Kitamura; Dana A Telem; Scott Nguyen; Celia M Divino
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques.

Authors:  Eelco Wassenaar; Ernst Schoenmaeckers; Johan Raymakers; Job van der Palen; Srdjan Rakic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Edward Mason; Titus Duncan; Russell Wilson; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  Current practice patterns for initial umbilical hernia repair in the United States.

Authors:  S Koebe; J Greenberg; L-C Huang; S Phillips; A Lidor; L Funk; A Shada
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Thirty-Day Outcomes Following Surgical Decompression of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

Authors:  Talha Maqbool; Christine B Novak; Timothy Jackson; Heather L Baltzer
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-09-05

4.  Primary uncomplicated midline ventral hernias: factors that influence and guide the surgical approach.

Authors:  H Alkhatib; A Fafaj; M Olson; T Stewart; D M Krpata
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hajibandeh; S Hajibandeh; A Sreh; A Khan; D Subar; L Jones
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Assessment of potential influencing factors on the outcome in small (< 2 cm) umbilical hernia repair: a registry-based multivariable analysis of 31,965 patients.

Authors:  F Köckerling; W Brunner; F Mayer; R Fortelny; D Adolf; H Niebuhr; R Lorenz; W Reinpold; K Zarras; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Umbilical hernia in patients with liver cirrhosis: A surgical challenge.

Authors:  Julio C U Coelho; Christiano M P Claus; Antonio C L Campos; Marco A R Costa; Caroline Blum
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-27

8.  Umbilical hernias: the cost of waiting.

Authors:  David S Strosberg; Matthew Pittman; Dean Mikami
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: overview of approaches and controversies.

Authors:  J A Bilezikian; P L Tenzel; F E Eckhauser; W W Hope
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Para-Umbilical Hernia- A Prospective Comparative Study of Short Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Sreeharsha Korukonda; Anandhi Amaranathan; Vishnu Prasad Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.