Literature DB >> 28969195

Laparoscopic versus Open Repair of Para-Umbilical Hernia- A Prospective Comparative Study of Short Term Outcomes.

Sreeharsha Korukonda1, Anandhi Amaranathan2, Vishnu Prasad Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Para-Umbilical Hernia (PUH) is one of the most common surgical problems. Since the prosthetic repair has become the standard of practice for inguinal hernia management, the same has been adapted for para-umbilical hernia management with better outcome. There is still debate going on regarding the optimal surgical approach. There are very few prospective studies comparing the laparoscopic and open method of para-umbilical hernia mesh repair. This study compared the short term outcomes following laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of PUH. AIM: To compare the early complications of open repair with laparoscopic repair of PUH. To compare the post-operative hospital stay of open repair with laparoscopic repair of PUH.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective comparative clinical study done from August 2014 to August 2016. All the patients above the age of 13 who attended our surgical outpatient department with PUH were taken into our study. Exclusion criteria included 1) Patients with obstructed or strangulated PUH 2) Patients with abdominal malignancies 3) Patients with coagulopathy, severe cardiopulmonary disease, ascites and renal failure 4) Patients who had PUH repair in combination with another major surgical operation such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair 5) Patients with recurrent PUH. Institute Ethical Committee clearance was obtained for this study.
RESULTS: Out of 40 patients with PUH, 20 received open meshplasty and 20 patients received laparoscopic meshplasty. Postoperative pain and length of hospital stay is significantly less in laparoscopic PUH repair. Postoperative complications like wound infection, seroma, and haematoma are relatively less in laparoscopic group though statistically not significant.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic PUH repair has significantly better outcome in terms of postoperative pain and postoperative hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic repair of umbilical hernia; Para umbilical hernia repair; Umbilical hernia

Year:  2017        PMID: 28969195      PMCID: PMC5620836          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28905.10512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  18 in total

1.  Comparative study between laparoscopic and open repair of paraumbilical hernia.

Authors:  I H Othman; Y H Metwally; I S Bakr; Y A Amer; M B Gaber; S A Elgohary
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 3.  Surgical progress in inguinal and ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Stephen H Gray; Mary T Hawn; Kamal M F Itani
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc; W V Booth
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-02

5.  Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias.

Authors:  P Sanjay; T D Reid; E L Davies; P J Arumugam; A Woodward
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Factors affecting wound complications in repair of ventral hernias.

Authors:  T J White; M C Santos; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 7.  Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Judy Jin; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.

Authors:  Ulrike Muschaweck
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date?

Authors:  Natalie Dabbas; K Adams; K Pearson; Gt Royle
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-01-19

10.  Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; Edward Mason; Titus Duncan; Russell Wilson; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  1 in total

1.  A systematic review on surgical treatment of primary epigastric hernias.

Authors:  L Blonk; Y A Civil; R Kaufmann; J C F Ket; S van der Velde
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.739

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.