PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe the development of a self-efficacy instrument that measures perceived ability to manage symptoms and quality-of-life problems resulting from the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. DESIGN: Items were developed and content validity assessed. A 14-item scale was psychometrically evaluated using internal consistency reliability and several types of construct validity. SAMPLE: 1,127 female breast cancer survivors (BCSs). METHODS: Written consents were mailed to the research office. Data were collected via mail and telephone. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Demographics, symptom bother, communication with healthcare provider, attention function, fear of recurrence, depression, marital satisfaction, fatigue, sexual functioning, trait and state anxiety, and overall well-being. FINDINGS: Data demonstrated that the breast cancer self-efficacy scale (BCSES) was reliable, with an alpha coefficient of 0.89, inter-item correlations ranging from 0.3-0.6, and item-total correlation coefficients ranging from 0.5-0.73. Three of 14 items were deleted because of redundancy as identified through high (> 0.7) inter-item correlations. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was unidimensional. Predictive validity was supported through testing associations between self-efficacy and theoretically supported quality-of-life variables, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions, as well as overall well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The BCSES demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality, and excellent content and construct validity. This scale should be integrated into interventions that target self-efficacy for managing symptoms in BCSs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses working with BCSs may use this tool to assess areas in which survivors might need to build confidence to adequately cope with their specific survivorship concerns. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: The use of the BCSES can inform nurse researchers about the impact of an intervention on self-efficacy in the context of breast cancer survivorship, improving the ability to deliver effective interventions. The scale is brief and easy to administer. Results of this study demonstrate clear psychometric reliability and validity, suggesting that the BCSES should be put to use immediately in interventions targeting the quality of life of BCSs.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe the development of a self-efficacy instrument that measures perceived ability to manage symptoms and quality-of-life problems resulting from the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. DESIGN: Items were developed and content validity assessed. A 14-item scale was psychometrically evaluated using internal consistency reliability and several types of construct validity. SAMPLE: 1,127 female breast cancer survivors (BCSs). METHODS: Written consents were mailed to the research office. Data were collected via mail and telephone. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Demographics, symptom bother, communication with healthcare provider, attention function, fear of recurrence, depression, marital satisfaction, fatigue, sexual functioning, trait and state anxiety, and overall well-being. FINDINGS: Data demonstrated that the breast cancer self-efficacy scale (BCSES) was reliable, with an alpha coefficient of 0.89, inter-item correlations ranging from 0.3-0.6, and item-total correlation coefficients ranging from 0.5-0.73. Three of 14 items were deleted because of redundancy as identified through high (> 0.7) inter-item correlations. Factor analysis revealed that the scale was unidimensional. Predictive validity was supported through testing associations between self-efficacy and theoretically supported quality-of-life variables, including physical, psychological, and social dimensions, as well as overall well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The BCSES demonstrated high internal consistency reliability, unidimensionality, and excellent content and construct validity. This scale should be integrated into interventions that target self-efficacy for managing symptoms in BCSs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses working with BCSs may use this tool to assess areas in which survivors might need to build confidence to adequately cope with their specific survivorship concerns. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: The use of the BCSES can inform nurse researchers about the impact of an intervention on self-efficacy in the context of breast cancer survivorship, improving the ability to deliver effective interventions. The scale is brief and easy to administer. Results of this study demonstrate clear psychometric reliability and validity, suggesting that the BCSES should be put to use immediately in interventions targeting the quality of life of BCSs.
Authors: Bernadine Cimprich; Nancy K Janz; Laurel Northouse; Patricia A Wren; Barbara Given; Charles W Given Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Win T Han; Kate Collie; Cheryl Koopman; Jay Azarow; Catherine Classen; Gary R Morrow; Betsy Michel; Eileen Brennan-O'Neill; David Spiegel Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Amy J Hoffman; Alexander von Eye; Audrey G Gift; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Marilyn Rothert Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Andrea A Cohee; Timothy E Stump; Patrick O Monahan; George W Sledge; David Cella; Victoria L Champion Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kim Wagler Ziner; George W Sledge; Cynthia J Bell; Shelley Johns; Kathy D Miller; Victoria L Champion Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Lynne I Wagner; Janet A Tooze; Daniel L Hall; Beverly J Levine; Jennifer Beaumont; Jenna Duffecy; David Victorson; William Gradishar; Joseph Leach; Thomas Saphner; Keren Sturtz; Mary Lou Smith; Frank Penedo; David C Mohr; David Cella Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Maria C Katapodi; Katrina R Ellis; Franziska Schmidt; Christos Nikolaidis; Laurel L Northouse Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.452