OBJECTIVE: Little attention has been given to assessing the importance of self-care and communication in the caregiving setting, especially caregiving for those who are terminally ill. The Caregiver Inventory (CGI), a measure of self-efficacy for caregiving that includes these two dimensions, was subjected to psychometric analyses. METHOD: One hundred and thirty-three primary caregivers completed the CGI; of those, 81 also completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and a measure of caregiver tasks (ADLR-CG). Based on home visits, social workers also rated the caregiver tasks required (ADLR-SW). Exploratory Factor Analysis, as well as reliability and validity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Fit indices in M + I (V. 5.1) indicated a four factors solution: Managing Medical Information (α = 0.64), Caring for Care Recipient (α = 0.78), Caring for Oneself (α = 0.88), and Managing Difficult Interactions/Emotions (α = 0.76). The CGI was highly negatively related to stress (PSS, r = -0.54, p = 0.001) and burden (CBI, p = -0.37, p = 0.001); ADLR-CG was related to burden (r = 0.43, p = 0.001) but not stress. In regression and relative importance analyses, Care of Oneself and Managing Difficult Interactions/Emotions emerged as equal in terms of having the strongest and most robust negative relationships with stress and burden. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Results suggest that the CGI is a reliable and valid measure of self-efficacy for caregiving, and indicate the importance of self-efficacy for self-care and for managing difficult communication in successfully navigating the demands of caregiving for terminally ill persons.
OBJECTIVE: Little attention has been given to assessing the importance of self-care and communication in the caregiving setting, especially caregiving for those who are terminally ill. The Caregiver Inventory (CGI), a measure of self-efficacy for caregiving that includes these two dimensions, was subjected to psychometric analyses. METHOD: One hundred and thirty-three primary caregivers completed the CGI; of those, 81 also completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI), and a measure of caregiver tasks (ADLR-CG). Based on home visits, social workers also rated the caregiver tasks required (ADLR-SW). Exploratory Factor Analysis, as well as reliability and validity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Fit indices in M + I (V. 5.1) indicated a four factors solution: Managing Medical Information (α = 0.64), Caring for Care Recipient (α = 0.78), Caring for Oneself (α = 0.88), and Managing Difficult Interactions/Emotions (α = 0.76). The CGI was highly negatively related to stress (PSS, r = -0.54, p = 0.001) and burden (CBI, p = -0.37, p = 0.001); ADLR-CG was related to burden (r = 0.43, p = 0.001) but not stress. In regression and relative importance analyses, Care of Oneself and Managing Difficult Interactions/Emotions emerged as equal in terms of having the strongest and most robust negative relationships with stress and burden. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Results suggest that the CGI is a reliable and valid measure of self-efficacy for caregiving, and indicate the importance of self-efficacy for self-care and for managing difficult communication in successfully navigating the demands of caregiving for terminally ill persons.
Authors: Christina L Rush; Margaret Darling; Maria Gloria Elliott; Ivis Febus-Sampayo; Charlene Kuo; Juliana Muñoz; Ysabel Duron; Migdalia Torres; Claudia Campos Galván; Florencia Gonzalez; Larisa Caicedo; Anna Nápoles; Roxanne E Jensen; Emily Anderson; Kristi D Graves Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Claire L Becker; Robert M Arnold; Seo Young Park; Margaret Rosenzweig; Thomas J Smith; Douglas B White; Kenneth J Smith; Yael Schenker Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Victoria L Champion; Kim W Ziner; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; David Cella; Lisa G Smith; Cynthia J Bell; Diane Von Ah; George W Sledge Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Christian E Waugh; Calissa J Leslie-Miller; Elaine Z Shing; R Michael Furr; Chandylen L Nightingale; Thomas W McLean Journal: Stress Health Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.454