C C M Marres1, M de Ridder1, I Hegger2, M L F van Velthuysen2, M Hauptmann3, A Navran4, A J M Balm5. 1. Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.balm@nki.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies suggest that lymph node ratio (LNR) is a strong prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. This study aims to determine if the yield of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) influences the LNR. METHODS: The study included 522 head and neck cancer patients, undergoing 638 primary and salvage (selective) neck dissections between 2002 and 2012. Before 2007 the neck dissection specimens were macroscopically and microscopically examined by pathologists and after 2007 the macroscopic examination was performed by pathology technicians. For comparison of mean LN yields, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: The mean number of LNs among 374 specimens examined by pathologists was 24 (range 0-89) vs. 32 (range 2-89) among 264 specimens examined by pathology technicians (P<.001). This caused the mean LNR in the non pre-treated patient group to drop from 11.4% to 8.7%. The counts of LNs per type of neck dissection were significantly different and increased with the number of levels involved. However, there was no linear relationship and the higher yields could be mostly ascribed to LNs in level V. The LNR varied from 8.1% to 18.4% among the different types of neck dissections. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in the number of harvested LNs, but a decrease in LNR was observed after introducing pathology technicians for macroscopic examination. A clear association between the extent of the dissection and the number of harvested LNs was observed. LNR appears to be strongly dependent on the harvesting protocol and the extent of the dissection.
OBJECTIVES: Recent studies suggest that lymph node ratio (LNR) is a strong prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. This study aims to determine if the yield of harvested lymph nodes (LNs) influences the LNR. METHODS: The study included 522 head and neck cancerpatients, undergoing 638 primary and salvage (selective) neck dissections between 2002 and 2012. Before 2007 the neck dissection specimens were macroscopically and microscopically examined by pathologists and after 2007 the macroscopic examination was performed by pathology technicians. For comparison of mean LN yields, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: The mean number of LNs among 374 specimens examined by pathologists was 24 (range 0-89) vs. 32 (range 2-89) among 264 specimens examined by pathology technicians (P<.001). This caused the mean LNR in the non pre-treated patient group to drop from 11.4% to 8.7%. The counts of LNs per type of neck dissection were significantly different and increased with the number of levels involved. However, there was no linear relationship and the higher yields could be mostly ascribed to LNs in level V. The LNR varied from 8.1% to 18.4% among the different types of neck dissections. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in the number of harvested LNs, but a decrease in LNR was observed after introducing pathology technicians for macroscopic examination. A clear association between the extent of the dissection and the number of harvested LNs was observed. LNR appears to be strongly dependent on the harvesting protocol and the extent of the dissection.
Authors: M de Ridder; C C M Marres; L E Smeele; M W M van den Brekel; M Hauptmann; A J M Balm; M L F van Velthuysen Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-09-18 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Christian Jacobi; Josepha Rauch; Jan Hagemann; Thomas Lautz; Maximilian Reiter; Philipp Baumeister Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Shlomo A Koyfman; Nofisat Ismaila; Doug Crook; Anil D'Cruz; Cristina P Rodriguez; David J Sher; Damian Silbermins; Erich M Sturgis; Terance T Tsue; Jared Weiss; Sue S Yom; F Christopher Holsinger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Oliver Voss; Lea Freund; Felix Neumann; Friedrich Mrosk; Kerstin Rubarth; Kilian Kreutzer; Christian Doll; Max Heiland; Steffen Koerdt Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 3.606