Literature DB >> 26711282

Which is the most suitable lymph node predictor for overall survival after primary surgery of head and neck cancer: pN, the number or the ratio of positive lymph nodes, or log odds?

Mehmet Metin Yildiz1, Iver Petersen2, Ekkehard Eigendorff3, Peter Schlattmann4, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the best lymph node (LN) metastasis predictor for overall survival (OS) in head neck cancer (HNC): pN classification, number of positive lymph nodes (PNOD), lymph node ratio (LNR), or log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS).
METHODS: In total, 225 surgically treated HNC patients were evaluated for the different LN classifications and OS.
RESULTS: Five-year OS was 71.8 %. Mean number of yielded LN and PNOD was 25.3 ± 16.7 and 2.7 ± 5.9, respectively. 64.8 % had a LNR > 0.10 and 64.4 % a LODDS > 10. In univariable analysis, multimodal therapy (p = 0.039), advanced pT (p < 0.0001), advanced UICC stage (p = 0.029), LNR > 0.10 (p = 0.049), and LODDS > -1.0 (p = 0.021) were associated with lower OS. In multivariable analysis, advanced pT [hazard ratio (HR) 2.194; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.294-3.722; p = 0.004] and LODDS > -1.0 (HR 1.634; 95 % CI 1.002-2.665; p = 0.059) remained independent predictors for lower OS.
CONCLUSIONS: It seems useful to analyze the prognostic significance of LODDS in other samples of HNC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer staging; Head and neck neoplasm; Lymph nodes; Lymphatic metastasis; Neck dissection; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711282     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2104-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  32 in total

1.  Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.

Authors:  Zhe Sun; Yan Xu; De Ming Li; Zhen Ning Wang; Guo Lian Zhu; Bao Jun Huang; Kai Li; Hui Mian Xu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Nodal yield and survival in oral squamous cancer: Defining the standard of care.

Authors:  Ardalan Ebrahimi; Wan J Zhang; Kan Gao; Jonathan R Clark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Patterns of spread in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A M Vaidya; G J Petruzzelli; J Clark; B Emami
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG (# 9501).

Authors:  Jacques Bernier; Jay S Cooper; T F Pajak; M van Glabbeke; J Bourhis; Arlene Forastiere; Esat Mahmut Ozsahin; John R Jacobs; J Jassem; Kie-Kian Ang; J L Lefèbvre
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Quantitative analysis of extracapsular extension of metastatic lymph nodes and its significance in radiotherapy planning in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar; Heide Schreiber-Facklam; Ruth Gräter; Christina Evers; Mathew Simcock; Andreas Geretschläger; Norbert M Blumstein; Peter Zbären; Yitzhak Zimmer; Ludwig Wilkens; Daniel M Aebersold
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Postoperative chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG-0234.

Authors:  Paul M Harari; Jonathan Harris; Merrill S Kies; Jeffrey N Myers; Richard C Jordan; Maura L Gillison; Robert L Foote; Mitchell Machtay; Marvin Rotman; Deepak Khuntia; William Straube; Qiang Zhang; Kian Ang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Lymph node ratio is of limited value for the decision-making process in the treatment of patients with laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Julian Künzel; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Georgios Psychogios; Abbas Agaimy; Philipp Grundtner; Michael Koch; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  The tumor-log odds of positive lymph nodes-metastasis staging system, a promising new staging system for gastric cancer after D2 resection in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Hui-juan Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Chao Ren; De-shen Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Hui-yan Luo; Yu-hong Li; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research.

Authors:  S G Patel; M Amit; T C Yen; C T Liao; P Chaturvedi; J P Agarwal; L P Kowalski; A Ebrahimi; J R Clark; C R Cernea; S J Brandao; M Kreppel; J Zöller; D Fliss; E Fridman; G Bachar; T Shpitzer; V A Bolzoni; P R Patel; S Jonnalagadda; K T Robbins; J P Shah; Z Gil
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Role of Intraparotid and Neck Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Parotid Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Mussab Kouka; Benjamin Koehler; Jens Buentzel; Holger Kaftan; Daniel Boeger; Andreas H Mueller; Andrea Wittig; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Thomas Ernst; Peter Schlattmann; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Results of a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving neck dissection in clinically node-negative squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Manoj Pandey; Senniappan Karthikeyan; Deepika Joshi; Mohan Kumar; Mridula Shukla
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  The Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio and Log Odds Ratio in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xinrui Zhang; Feng Yu; Zheng Zhao; Junhao Mai; Yibo Zhou; Guojie Tan; Xuekui Liu
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-09-27

4.  Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arikin Abdeyrim; Shizhi He; Yang Zhang; Gulbostan Mamtali; Aibadla Asla; Mirkamil Yusup; Jiang Liu
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Long-term survival trend after primary total laryngectomy for patients with locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhongyang Lin; Hanqing Lin; Yuqing Chen; Yuanteng Xu; Xihang Chen; Hui Fan; Xiaobo Wu; Xiaoying Ke; Chang Lin
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Log odds of positive lymph nodes as an independent predictor of overall survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Varuni Iyer; Kiran Kumar; Kaveri Hallikeri; Anil Kumar Desai; Niranjan Kumar; Srikant Natarajan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2021-01-09

7.  Lymph node ratio as a predictor for minor salivary gland cancer in head and neck.

Authors:  Hidenori Suzuki; Eiichi Sasaki; Gaku Takano; Seiya Goto; Daisuke Nishikawa; Shintaro Beppu; Hoshino Terada; Michi Sawabe; Nobuhiro Hanai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The log odds of positive neck lymph nodes is a superior lymph node predictor for overall survival in head and neck cancer: a population-based analysis in Germany.

Authors:  Mussab Kouka; Elisa Al-Ahmar; Jens Büntzel; Holger Kaftan; Daniel Böger; Andreas Müller; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Thomas Ernst; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.236

9.  Recommendation for incorporation of a different lymph node scoring system in future AJCC N category for oral cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Yu-Chieh Su; Shih-Kai Hung; Po-Chun Chen; Chung-I Huang; Wei-Lun Huang; Yu-Wei Lin; Ching-Chieh Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.