Shlomo A Koyfman1, Nofisat Ismaila2, Doug Crook3, Anil D'Cruz4, Cristina P Rodriguez5, David J Sher6, Damian Silbermins7, Erich M Sturgis8, Terance T Tsue9, Jared Weiss10, Sue S Yom11, F Christopher Holsinger12. 1. 1 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 2. 2 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA. 3. 3 Patient representative, Indianapolis, IN. 4. 4 Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. 5. 5 University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 6. 6 University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX. 7. 7 Huntington Internal Medicine Group, Huntington, WV. 8. 8 Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 9. 9 University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS. 10. 10 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 11. 11 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 12. 12 Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one. RECOMMENDATIONS: For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .
PURPOSE: The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS: The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one. RECOMMENDATIONS: For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .
Authors: Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Douglas W Blayney; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Julie M Vose; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Shao Hui Huang; Jie Su; Adam S Garden; Erich M Sturgis; Kristina Dahlstrom; Nancy Lee; Nadeem Riaz; Xin Pei; Shlomo A Koyfman; David Adelstein; Brian B Burkey; Jeppe Friborg; Claus A Kristensen; Anita B Gothelf; Frank Hoebers; Bernd Kremer; Ernst-Jan Speel; Daniel W Bowles; David Raben; Sana D Karam; Eugene Yu; Wei Xu Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: J M Bachaud; E Cohen-Jonathan; C Alzieu; J M David; E Serrano; N Daly-Schveitzer Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David W Schoppy; Kim F Rhoads; Yifei Ma; Michelle M Chen; Brian Nussenbaum; Ryan K Orosco; Eben L Rosenthal; Vasu Divi Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Reilly A Sample; Carey Burton Wood; Angela L Mazul; Thomas F Barrett; Randal C Paniello; Jason T Rich; Stephen Y Kang; Jose Zevallos; Mackenzie D Daly; Wade L Thorstad; Stephanie Y Chen; Patrik Pipkorn; Ryan S Jackson; Sidharth V Puram Journal: Head Neck Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 3.821
Authors: Giri Krishnan; Nynke S van den Berg; Naoki Nishio; Georgina Juniper; Jaqueline Pei; Quan Zhou; Guolan Lu; Yu-Jin Lee; Kimberly Ramos; Andrei H Iagaru; Fred M Baik; Alexander D Colevas; Brock A Martin; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Theranostics Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 11.556