| Literature DB >> 24159308 |
Carlos Andrés Zárate-Chaves1, María Camila Romero-Rodríguez, Fabián Camilo Niño-Arias, Jorge Robles-Camargo, Melva Linares-Linares, María Ximena Rodríguez-Bocanegra, Ivonne Gutiérrez-Rojas.
Abstract
The present work was aimed at optimizing a culture medium for biomass production and phenolic compounds by using Ganoderma lucidum. The culture was optimized in two stages; a Plackett-Burman design was used in the first one for identifying key components in the medium and a central composite design was used in the second one for optimizing their concentration. Both responses (biomass and phenolic compounds) were simultaneously optimized by the latter methodology regarding desirability, and the optimal concentrations obtained were 50.00 g/L sucrose, 13.29 g/L yeast extract and 2.99 g/L olive oil. Maximum biomass production identified in these optimal conditions was 9.5 g/L and that for phenolic compounds was 0.0452 g/L, this being 100% better than that obtained in the media usually used in the laboratory. Similar patterns regarding chemical characterization and biological activity towards Aspergillus sp., from both fruiting body and mycelium-derived secondary metabolites and extracts obtained in the proposed medium were observed. It was shown that such statistical methodologies are useful for optimizing fermentation and, in the specific case of G. lucidum, optimizing processes for its production and its metabolites in submerged culture as an alternative to traditional culture.Entities:
Keywords: Ganoderma lucidum; Medium optimization; Plackett-Burman; central composite design; phenolic compounds
Year: 2013 PMID: 24159308 PMCID: PMC3804202 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822013005000032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Experimental variables at different levels in Plackett-Burman design for G. lucidum biomass production.
| Code | Variable | Units | Experimental levels | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Lower (−) | Higher (+) | |||
| A | Glucose | g/L | 10 | 20 |
| B | Sucrose | g/L | 8 | 16 |
| C | Lactose | g/L | 10 | 20 |
| D | Yeast extract | g/L | 2 | 5 |
| E | Peptone | g/L | 2 | 5 |
| F | Ammonium chloride | g/L | 2 | 5 |
| G | Olive oil | % (v/v) | 0 | 3 |
| H | Initial pH | - | 5.5 | 6.5 |
| I | Thiamine | mg/L | 0 | 50 |
Independent variable levels tested for the central composite design.
| Code | Variable | Units | Experimental levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| −1.5 | −1 | 0 | +1 | +1.5 | |||
| Olive oil | % (v/v) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | |
| Yeast extract | g/L | 3 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 21 | |
| Sucrose | g/L | 25 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 55 | |
Plackett Burman design results. The medium components and initial pH significance on G. lucidum biomass production are showed after 10 fermentation days.
| Exp Nº | Variable code | Biomass | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | ||
| 1 | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | 12.6 ± 0.4 |
| 2 | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | 7.3 ± 0.6 |
| 3 | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | 4.3 ± 0.7 |
| 4 | + | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | 2.6 ± 0.2 |
| 5 | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | 4.8 ± 0.1 |
| 6 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 2.3 ± 0.3 |
| 7 | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | 9.6 ± 1.4 |
| 8 | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | 7.8 ± 0.6 |
| 9 | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | 9.7 ± 1.6 |
| 10 | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | 5.6 ± 0.1 |
| 11 | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | − | 12.1 ± 1.1 |
| 12 | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | 3.7 ± 0.4 |
| Effect | 0.170 | 0.090 | 0.160 | 1.330 | 0.270 | −0.770 | 2.960 | 0.220 | −0.110 | |
| F-value | 0.604 | 0.160 | 0.542 | 36.209 | 1.475 | 12.150 | 178.739 | 0.968 | 0.244 | |
| P-value | 0.519 | 0.728 | 0.538 | 0.027 | 0.349 | 0.073 | 0.006 | 0.429 | 0.670 | |
Results shown are average of three replicate experiments.
Significant at 95% confidence.
Central composite design results. The coded values of independent variables and obtained and predicted values for the three response variables are showed. The biomass and EPC responses were determined after 10 fermentation days.
| Run | Independent variables (in coded value) | Response variables | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Biomass (g/L) | EPC (g/L) | D | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Obtained value | Predicted value | Obtained value | Predicted value | Obtained value | Predicted value | ||||
| 1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 9.0 ± 2.1 | 9.28 | 0.0122 ± 0.002 | 0.0200 | 0.289 | 0.374 |
| 2 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 13.1 ± 0.5 | 11.86 | 0.0388 ± 0.003 | 0.0377 | 0.683 | 0.642 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 5.00 | 0.0576 ± 0.026 | 0.0490 | 0.618 | 0.530 |
| 4 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 7.0 ± 1.7 | 7.09 | 0.0066 ± 0.006 | 0.0141 | 0.178 | 0.235 |
| 5 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 6.9 ± 0.4 | 6.58 | 0.0382 ± 0.084 | 0.0293 | 0.532 | 0.416 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.1 ± 1.8 | 10.98 | 0.0410 ± 0.021 | 0.0379 | 0.641 | 0.635 |
| 7 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 11.2 ± 0.7 | 10.79 | 0.0413 ± 0.018 | 0.0370 | 0.669 | 0.600 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 6.89 | 0.0362 ± 0.007 | 0.0361 | 0.479 | 0.489 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 5.20 | 0.0067 ± 0.002 | 0.0098 | 0.158 | 0.195 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.2 ± 2.4 | 10.98 | 0.0333 ± 0.012 | 0.0379 | 0.585 | 0.635 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.51.0 | 10.98 | 0.0299 ± 0.011 | 0.0379 | 0.553 | 0.635 |
| 12 | 0 | −1.5 | 0 | 8.3 ± 1.2 | 7.05 | 0.0001 ± 0.000 | −0.0113 | 0.014 | −0.126 |
| 13 | +1.5 | 0 | 0 | 5.2 ± 0.5 | 5.97 | 0.0107 ± 0.005 | 0.0048 | 0.216 | 0.180 |
| 14 | −1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 ± 0.6 | 0.21 | 0.0001 ± 0.000 | 0.0105 | 0.006 | 0.097 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.9 ± 2.2 | 8.75 | 0.0323 ± 0.005 | 0.0221 | 0.569 | 0.394 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 ± 2.5 | 8.75 | 0.0239 ± 0.004 | 0.0221 | 0.390 | 0.394 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | +1.5 | 8.8 ± 1.2 | 8.18 | 0.0419 ± 0.003 | 0.0461 | 0.618 | 0.645 |
| 18 | 0 | +1.5 | 0 | 7.9 ± 1.0 | 9.22 | 0.0001 ± 0.000 | 0.0160 | 0.014 | 0.209 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 ± 2.2 | 8.75 | 0.0197 ± 0.009 | 0.0221 | 0.390 | 0.394 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | −1.5 | 7.0 ± 0.4 | 7.72 | 0.0266 ± 0.005 | 0.0269 | 0.427 | 0.456 |
Central composite design variance analysis. The desirability was determined using importance coefficients of 3 and 5 for biomass and EPC, respectively.
| Factor | Biomass ( | EPC ( | D ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| P-value | Estimated effect | P-value | Estimated effect | P-value | Estimated effect | |
| 0.0013 | 1.92 | 0.6517 | 0.007 | 0.4652 | 0.112 | |
| 0.1156 | 0.72 | 0.0275 | 0.037 | 0.0133 | 0.063 | |
| 0.7215 | 0.15 | 0.0780 | 0.028 | 0.1161 | −0.113 | |
| ( | 0.0004 | −2.52 | 0.1397 | −0.026 | 0.0209 | −0.156 |
| ( | 0.5694 | −0.27 | 0.0148 | −0.048 | 0.0038 | 0.070 |
| ( | 0.4631 | −0.36 | 0.0582 | 0.034 | 0.1194 | 0.047 |
| 0.1360 | 0.85 | 0.5641 | 0.011 | 0.3316 | −0.039 | |
| 0.8133 | 0.13 | 0.7676 | −0.005 | 0.4144 | −0.045 | |
| 0.1512 | −0.81 | 0.8415 | 0.004 | 0.3474 | 0.112 | |
| Intercept | - | 9.87 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.51 |
| Model | 0.0047 | - | 0.0457 | - | 0.0163 | - |
| Lack of fit | 0.6644 | - | 0.0734 | - | 0.1052 | - |
| R2 | 0.879 | - | 0.807 | - | 0.855 | - |
| R2 (fitted) | 0.770 | - | 0.633 | - | 0.644 | - |
Significant at 95% confidence.
Figure 13D response surface and contours plot, showing interactive effects of olive oil (X1) and yeast extract (X2), sacarose (X3) maintained at 30 g/L. Effects over: A. Biomass (g/L), B. EPC (g/L) and C. Desirability.
Chemical characterization and antifungal activity of biomass and culture medium extracts.
| Extract source | Fraction | Chemical characterization | Antifungal activity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| TLC stains | Inhibition growth diameter (mm) | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Vanillin (phenolics steroids) | SbCl3 (terpenoids) | Neu reagent (flavonoids) | KOH (coumarins) | Hydroxylamine FeCl3 (lactones) | 2 4 DNPH (ketones) | ||||
| Mature fruiting bodies | Benzine | + | + | + | + | − | + | 0 ± 0a | 0 ± 0a |
| CH2Cl2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 ± 0a | 17.35 ± 2.35d | |
| EtOAc | + | + | + | + | + | + | 0 ± 0a | 14.41 ± 1.06c | |
|
| |||||||||
| Mycelium (optimized culture medium) | Benzine | + | + | + | − | − | + | 0 ± 0a | 0 ± 0 a |
| CH2Cl2 | + | + | + | − | + | + | 8.50 ± 1.10b | 11.25 ± 1.03b | |
| EtOAc | + | + | − | − | − | + | 0 ± 0a | 17.52 ± 1.36d | |
|
| |||||||||
| Culture medium | Benzine | + | + | − | − | − | − | 0 ± 0a | 0 ± 0a |
| CH2Cl2 | + | − | − | − | − | − | 8.06 ± 0.62b | 13.17 ± 2.16c | |
| EtOAc | + | − | − | − | − | − | 9.75 ± 1.63c | 18.75 ± 1.07d | |