| Literature DB >> 35889123 |
Catalina Rosales-López1, Alejandro Vargas-López1, Mariana Monge-Artavia1, Miguel Rojas-Chaves1.
Abstract
In the present investigation, the conditions for in vitro submerged culture of a native strain of Ganoderma sp. were evaluated. Different culture medium ingredients, inoculum concentrations, inoculation methods, configuration, and airflows were evaluated to improve biomass production. The addition of thiamine and olive oil to the culture medium increased biomass production, as well as inoculating 6.6 g/L since there are no significant differences in biomass growth according to inoculum origin (pre-inoculum, discs or with spores). The best configuration of the 3 L stirred tank bioreactor was using three impellers and a porous air diffuser of 0.25 volume per volume per minute (vvm), the dry biomass concentration was 22.6 g/L after 12 days of cultivation at 30 °C, much higher than other investigations. This study provides relevant information for pilot-scale production of this fungus for future secondary metabolites. The culture medium was optimized, and it was defined that the concentration and origin of the inoculum did not influence the growth of Biomass, but the aeration and the configuration of the system allowed the establishment of protocols for the cultivation of Ganoderma sp.Entities:
Keywords: Ganoderma; biomass; bioreactor; culture medium; inoculum; secondary metabolites
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889123 PMCID: PMC9322093 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10071404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Components studied to optimize the culture medium.
| Factors | Concentration (g/L) | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (–) | High (+) | |||
| Olive oil | 0.00 * | 3.00 | [ | |
| Salts | CaCl2 2H2O | 0.00 | 1.45 | [ |
| CuSO4 5H2O | 0.00 | 0.25 | [ | |
| Thiamine | 0.00 | 0.05 | [ | |
* not added.
Dry biomass concentrations in treatments evaluated for optimization of the culture medium.
| Medium | Variables | Dry Biomass Concentration (g/L) | Tukey’s Grouping | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olive Oil | Salts | Thiamine | |||
| A | + | + | + * | 19.87 ± 1.73 ** | a b |
| B | + | + | - | 19.05 ± 1.70 | a b c |
| C | + | - | + | 23.39 ± 2.44 | a |
| D | + | - | - | 14.24 ± 1.24 | c d |
| E | - | + | + | 12.23 ± 1.39 | d |
| F | - | + | - | 14.30 ± 0.98 | c d |
| G | - | - | + | 16.04 ± 0.94 | b c d |
| H | - | - | - | 12.56 ± 2.61 | d |
* “+” included and “-” not included; ** Standard deviations for n = 3.
Analysis of variance calculated by Minitab 19 for the factorial design.
| Source | DF * | Adj SS ** | Adj MS *** | F-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7 | 327.497 | 46.785 | 15.60 | 0.000 |
| Linear | 3 | 220.794 | 73.598 | 24.54 | 0.000 |
| Olive Oil | 1 | 171.949 | 171.949 | 57.33 | 0.000 |
| Salts | 1 | 0.224 | 0.224 | 0.07 | 0.788 |
| Thiamine | 1 | 48.621 | 48.621 | 16.21 | 0.001 |
| 2-Way Interactions | 3 | 103.818 | 34.606 | 11.54 | 0.000 |
| Olive Oil * Salts | 1 | 4.234 | 4.234 | 1.41 | 0.252 |
| Olive Oil * Thiamine | 1 | 27.478 | 27.478 | 9.16 | 0.008 |
| Salts * Thiamine | 1 | 72.107 | 72.107 | 24.04 | 0.000 |
| 3-Way Interactions | 1 | 2.884 | 2.884 | 0.96 | 0.341 |
| Olive Oil * Salts * Thiamine | 1 | 2.884 | 2.884 | 0.96 | 0.341 |
| Error | 16 | 47.992 | 3.000 | ||
| Total | 23 | 375.489 |
* DF: Degrees of freedom. ** Adj SS: Adjusted sum of squares. *** Adj MS: Adjusted mean square.
Dry biomass concentration of each pair of treatments analyzed by Tukey’s method of multiple comparisons for the olive oil–thiamine interaction. n = 3.
| Treatment Pairs | Level | Mean Dry Biomass | Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olive Oil | Thiamine | |||||
| A-C | + | + | 21.63 ± 2.70 * | a | ||
| B-D | + | - | 16.64 ± 2.95 | b | ||
| E-G | - | + | 14.14 ± 2.34 | b | c | |
| F-H | - | - | 13.43 ± 2.01 | c | ||
* s.d.
Dry biomass concentration for each pair of treatments analyzed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for the salt–thiamine interaction, n = 3.
| Means of Treatments | Concentration | Mean Dry Biomass | Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salts | Thiamine | |||||
| C-G | - | + | 19.71 ± 4.35 * | a | ||
| B-F | + | - | 16.67 ± 2.88 | b | ||
| A-E | + | + | 16.05 ± 4.41 | b | c | |
| D-H | - | - | 13.40 ± 2.05 | c | ||
* s.d.
Figure 1Dry biomass concentration obtained after 14 days in the optimized medium (C), optimized medium supplemented with 9.1 g/L olive oil (C2), and commercial potato dextrose medium (PDB). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Figure 2The effect of the inoculum method on the dry biomass weight of Ganoderma sp. mycelia.
Figure 3Dry biomass concentration and growth index obtained after 14 days using different inoculum concentrations. Black bars: dry biomass concentration (g/L). Striped bars: growth index (g/g). Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Specific growth rate of Ganoderma sp. in the submerged culture obtained from different growth models.
| Model | Specific Growth Rate (h−1) | Standard Error of the Regression (g/L) | AICc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exponential | 0.0041 ± 0.0005 * | 2.42 | 42.54 |
| Logistic | 0.0139 ± 0.0026 | 1.76 | 28.54 |
| Gompertz | 0.0087 ± 0.0019 | 1.67 | 25.93 |
| Richards | 0.0087 ± 0.0108 | 1.71 | 28.56 |
* Standard error for the parameter estimation.
Figure 4Growth kinetics of the Ganoderma sp. in the flask culture. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent replicates.
Figure 5Dry biomass concentration (at 12 days) and kLa (before inoculation) for the two airflow rates tested at the stirred tank bioreactor. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of two independent replicates.
Reported dry biomass concentrations and culture conditions for Ganoderma sp. growth in stirred tank bioreactors.
| Culture Medium (g/L) | Operating Conditions | Bioreactor Configuration | Operation Mode | Dry Biomass Concentration (g/L) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glc 30, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 0.5, K2HPO4 0.5, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5, B1 0.05, OO 9.1 | 30 °C, pH 5.5, 0.5 g/L, 12 d | 2 L, 350 rpm, 0.25 vvm, MA-PI6-RT, PS | Batch | 22.6 (12 d) | This work |
| Glc 16, Pep 2.93, CF 20.93, SBP 6.44, KH2PO4 1.5, MgSO4 7H2O 1 | 30 °C, 2.0 g/L, 6 d | 35 L, 125 rpm, 0.6 vvm | Batch | 21.5 (5 d) | [ |
| Glc 55, YE 14.3, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.26, Fe2(SO4)3 0.34, B1 0.05 | 30 °C, pH 5.5, 0.5 g/L, 12 d | 7 L, 300 rpm, 1.0 vvm, RT-RT, RS | Batch | 25.7 (12 d) | [ |
| WB 200, YE 80 | 30 °C, pH 6.0, 14.7 g/L, 8 d | 4 L, 200 rpm, 1.0 vvm, RT | Batch | 28.2 (8 d) | [ |
| Lac 35, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5, B1 0.05 | 30 °C, pH 5.5, pO2 20–35%, 0.6 g/L, 22 d | 2 L, 100–180 rpm, 0.25–0.5 vvm, RT-RT, RS | Fed batch | 21.9 (12 d) | [ |
| Glc 35, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5 | 30 °C, pH 4.0, pO2 20%, 0.5 g/L, 10 d | 10 L, 300 rpm, 2.0 vvm (max) | Fed batch | 26.6 (10 d) | [ |
| Lac 35, Pep 5, YE 5, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.5, B1 0.05 | 30 °C, pH 3.0–4.5, pO2 25–10%, 0.6 g/L, 18 d | 5.5 L, 50–400 rpm, 0.1–0.7 vvm, RT-RT-PI4, RS | Fed batch | 22.6 (12 d) | [ |
| Glc 25, Suc 20, YE 14, KH2PO4 1, MgSO4 7H2O 0.26, B1 0.05 | 30 °C, pH 5.5, 0.5 g/L, 10 d | 7 L, 300 rpm, 1.0 vvm | Fed batch | 29.7 (9 d) | [ |