| Literature DB >> 24031553 |
Bibhu Prasad Panda1, Saleem Javed, Mohd Ali.
Abstract
Angkak (red mold rice, red yeast rice, Chinese red rice) is a traditional Chinese medicine produced by solid-state fermentation of cooked non-glutinous rice with Monascus species. The secondary metabolite of Monascus species, monacolin K /lovastatin, has been proven to lower blood lipid levels. In this study, a co-culture of Monascus purpureus MTCC 369 and Monascus ruber MTCC 1880 was used for angkak production. Four medium parameters screened by Plackett-Burman design were optimized by response surface methodology for highest lovastatin production in angkak during solid-state fermentation by the co-culture. Maximum lovastatin production of 2.84 mg g(-1) was predicted in solid medium containing 20 g rice and 40 ml liquid nutrients medium (malt extract 9.68 g l(-1), dextrose 38.90 g l(-1), MnSO4.H2O 1.96 g l(-1), and MgSO4.7H2O 0.730 g l(-1)) by point prediction tool of Design Expert 7.1 software (Statease Inc. USA).Entities:
Keywords: Angkak; Co-culture; Lovastatin; Monascus purpureus; Monascus ruber; Response surface methodology
Year: 2010 PMID: 24031553 PMCID: PMC3768636 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000300028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Concentrations of variables of liquid medium in Plackett-Burman design for solid-state fermentation.
| X1 | Peptone | 5.0g | 15.0g |
| X2 | Glucose | 80g | 160g |
| X3 | Glycerin | 16ml | 32ml |
| X4 | NaCl | 2.0g | 8.0g |
| X5 | NH4Cl | 2.0g | 8.0g |
| D1 | Dummy 1 | - | - |
| X6 | MgSO4.7H2O | 0.1g | 0.9g |
| X7 | CaCl2.2H2O | 0.0g | 0.6g |
| X8 | MnSO4.H2O | 0.0g | 1.5g |
| X9 | Malt extract | 2.0g | 8.0g |
| D2 | Dummy 2 | - | - |
Plackett-Burman experimental design of 12 trials for eleven variables (9 nutrients + 2 dummy) and observed concentration of lovastatin in angkak samples.
| 1 | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | 1.060 |
| 2 | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | 0.563 |
| 3 | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | 0.764 |
| 4 | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | 0.450 |
| 5 | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | 1.880 |
| 6 | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | + | 1.990 |
| 7 | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | + | 1.780 |
| 8 | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | + | 0.764 |
| 9 | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | - | 1.760 |
| 10 | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | + | 1.080 |
| 11 | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | 0.984 |
| 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.534 |
Influence of medium variables on lovastatin production in angkak samples
| X1 | Peptone | 7.112 | 6.497 | 0.034 | 0.102 | 1.214 | 00.968 | 0.072 |
| X2 | Dextrose | 5.677 | 7.932 | 0.421 | -0.375 | 15.035 | 11.900 | |
| X3 | Glycerine | 7.031 | 6.578 | 0.016 | 0.075 | 0.571 | 00.454 | |
| X4 | NaCl | 6.328 | 7.281 | 0.076 | -0.158 | 2.714 | 02.160 | |
| X5 | NH4Cl | 6.717 | 6.892 | 0.002 | -0.029 | 0.071 | 00.061 | |
| X6 | MgSO4.7H2O | 7.307 | 6.302 | 0.085 | 0.167 | 3.035 | 02.400 | |
| X7 | CaCl2.2H2O | 6.718 | 6.891 | 0.002 | -0.288 | 0.071 | 00.076 | |
| X8 | MnSO4.H2O | 7.828 | 5.781 | 0.345 | 0.341 | 12.321 | 09.710 | |
| X9 | Malt extract | 9.550 | 4.059 | 2.510 | 0.915 | 89.642 | 70.700 |
Levels of nutrient parameters used in Box-Behnken’s response surface design
| -1 | 0 | +1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malt extract | 07.00 | 10.00 | 13.00 |
| Dextrose | 20.00 | 40.00 | 60.00 |
| MnSO4.H2O | 01.00 | 01.50 | 02.00 |
| MgSO4.7H2O | 00.50 | 01.00 | 01.50 |
Box-Behnken’s design with actual and predicted lovastatin concentrations
| 1 | 7 | 20 | 1.5 | 1 | 1.58 | 1.44 |
| 2 | 13 | 20 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.612 | 0.27 |
| 3 | 7 | 60 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.756 | 0.784 |
| 4 | 13 | 60 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.986 | 0.812 |
| 5 | 10 | 40 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.68 | 2.27 |
| 6 | 10 | 40 | 2 | 0.5 | 2.45 | 1.93 |
| 7 | 10 | 40 | 1 | 1.5 | 0.764 | 0.966 |
| 8 | 10 | 40 | 2 | 1.5 | 0.875 | 0.97 |
| 9 | 7 | 40 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 2.58 | 2.49 |
| 10 | 13 | 40 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.765 | 1.01 |
| 11 | 7 | 40 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.657 | 0.446 |
| 12 | 13 | 40 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.654 | 0.78 |
| 13 | 10 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 0.435 | 0.668 |
| 14 | 10 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 1.78 | 1.86 |
| 15 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 1.78 | 1.75 |
| 16 | 10 | 60 | 2 | 1 | 0.645 | 0.447 |
| 17 | 7 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1.76 | 1.78 |
| 18 | 13 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 0.784 | 0.667 |
| 19 | 7 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0.674 | 1.07 |
| 20 | 13 | 40 | 2 | 1 | 0.783 | 1.04 |
| 21 | 10 | 20 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.56 | 1.95 |
| 22 | 10 | 60 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.24 | 1.62 |
| 23 | 10 | 20 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.645 | 0.543 |
| 24 | 10 | 60 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.873 | 0.763 |
| 25 | 10 | 40 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.65 | 2.63 |
| 26 | 10 | 40 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.56 | 2.63 |
| 27 | 10 | 40 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.67 | 2.63 |
| 28 | 10 | 40 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.65 | 2.63 |
| 29 | 10 | 40 | 1.5 | 1 | 2.63 | 2.63 |
Analysis of variance of the calculated model for lovastatin production
| Sum of squares | 17.8 |
| 14 | |
| Mean squares | 1.27 |
| 12.3 | |
| < 0.0001 | |
| Sum of squares | 1.45 |
| 14 | |
| Mean squares | 0.103 |
| Sum of squares | 1.44 |
| 10 | |
| Mean squares | 0.144 |
| 81.4 | |
| 0.000354 | |
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.925 |
| Coefficient of variation (CV %) | 22.5 |
| Adequate precision value | 10.2 (> 4) |
Figure 1(a-d) Response surface plots showing relative effects of two nutrient parameters on lovastatin production while keeping other two parameters at constant levels.