Literature DB >> 24159253

People Believe That They Are Prototypically Good or Bad.

Michael M Roy1, Michael J Liersch, Stephen Broomell.   

Abstract

People have been shown to view their beliefs as being prototypical (modal) but their abilities as (falsely) unique (above or below average). It is possible that these two viewpoints - self as prototypical and self as unique - can be reconciled. If the distribution of ability for a given skill is skewed such that many others have high (low) ability and few others have low (high) ability, it is possible that a majority of peoples' self-assessments can be above (below) average. Participants in 5 studies demonstrated an understanding that various skills have skewed ability distributions and their self-assessments were related to distribution shape: high when negatively skewed and low when positively skewed. Further, participants tended to place themselves near the mode of their perceived skill distribution. Participants were most likely to think that they were good at skills for which they thought that most others were also good.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Better-Than-Average Effect; Bias; Prototypical; Self-Assessment; Skew

Year:  2013        PMID: 24159253      PMCID: PMC3804268          DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  27 in total

1.  Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments.

Authors:  J Kruger
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Biases in social comparative judgments: the role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects.

Authors:  John R Chambers; Paul D Windschitl
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: a meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005).

Authors:  Constantine Sedikides; Lowell Gaertner; Jack L Vevea
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-10

4.  Dogs still do resemble their owners.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Nicholas J S Christenfeld
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-09

5.  Decision by sampling.

Authors:  Neil Stewart; Nick Chater; Gordon D A Brown
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.

Authors:  Jonathan C Pettibone; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-01-02

7.  Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.

Authors:  Piotr Winkielman; Jamin Halberstadt; Tedra Fazendeiro; Steve Catty
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

8.  Intrapersonal and social comparison determinants of happiness: a range-frequency analysis.

Authors:  R H Smith; E Diener; D H Wedell
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1989-03

9.  Idiosyncratic trait definitions: implications for self-description and social judgment.

Authors:  D Dunning; R O McElwee
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1995-05

10.  When standards are wide of the mark: nonselective superiority and inferiority biases in comparative judgments of objects and concepts.

Authors:  Eilath E Giladi; Yechiel Klar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  I Am a Better Driver Than You Think: Examining Self-Enhancement for Driving Ability.

Authors:  Michael M Roy; Michael J Liersch
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-08-01

2.  Belief in optimism might be more problematic than actual optimism.

Authors:  Michael M Roy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.