Literature DB >> 24159246

Network Sampling with Memory: A proposal for more efficient sampling from social networks.

Ted Mouw, Ashton M Verdery.   

Abstract

Techniques for sampling from networks have grown into an important area of research across several fields. For sociologists, the possibility of sampling from a network is appealing for two reasons: (1) A network sample can yield substantively interesting data about network structures and social interactions, and (2) it is useful in situations where study populations are difficult or impossible to survey with traditional sampling approaches because of the lack of a sampling frame. Despite its appeal, methodological concerns about the precision and accuracy of network-based sampling methods remain. In particular, recent research has shown that sampling from a network using a random walk based approach such as Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) can result in high design effects (DE)-the ratio of the sampling variance to the sampling variance of simple random sampling (SRS). A high design effect means that more cases must be collected to achieve the same level of precision as SRS. In this paper we propose an alternative strategy, Network Sampling with Memory (NSM), which collects network data from respondents in order to reduce design effects and, correspondingly, the number of interviews needed to achieve a given level of statistical power. NSM combines a "List" mode, where all individuals on the revealed network list are sampled with the same cumulative probability, with a "Search" mode, which gives priority to bridge nodes connecting the current sample to unexplored parts of the network. We test the relative efficiency of NSM compared to RDS and SRS on 162 school and university networks from Add Health and Facebook that range in size from 110 to 16,278 nodes. The results show that the average design effect for NSM on these 162 networks is 1.16, which is very close to the efficiency of a simple random sample (DE=1), and 98.5% lower than the average DE we observed for RDS.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24159246      PMCID: PMC3805142          DOI: 10.1177/0081175012461248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  19 in total

1.  Adaptive web sampling.

Authors:  Steven K Thompson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance.

Authors:  Robert Magnani; Keith Sabin; Tobi Saidel; Douglas Heckathorn
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data.

Authors:  Nathan Eagle; Alex Sandy Pentland; David Lazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Authors:  Carl Kendall; Ligia R F S Kerr; Rogerio C Gondim; Guilherme L Werneck; Raimunda Hermelinda Maia Macena; Marta Kerr Pontes; Lisa G Johnston; Keith Sabin; Willi McFarland
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2008-04-04

5.  Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook.

Authors:  Andreas Wimmer; Kevin Lewis
Journal:  AJS       Date:  2010-09

6.  Partner concordance in reports of joint risk behaviors.

Authors:  D C Bell; I D Montoya; J S Atkinson
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Nicky McCreesh; Simon D W Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J Copas; Richard J Hayes; Richard G White
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Assessment of respondent driven sampling for recruiting female sex workers in two Vietnamese cities: reaching the unseen sex worker.

Authors:  Lisa Grazina Johnston; Keith Sabin; Thu Hien Mai; Thi Huong Pham
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Respondent-driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Application of respondent driven sampling to collect baseline data on FSWs and MSM for HIV risk reduction interventions in two urban centres in Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  William Yeka; Geraldine Maibani-Michie; Dimitri Prybylski; Donn Colby
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

View more
  18 in total

1.  Identification of Homophily and Preferential Recruitment in Respondent-Driven Sampling.

Authors:  Forrest W Crawford; Peter M Aronow; Li Zeng; Jianghong Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Communication flows and the durability of a transnational social field.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Ted Mouw; Heather Edelblute; Sergio Chavez
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2017-03-09

3.  Overlooked Threats to Respondent Driven Sampling Estimators: Peer Recruitment Reality, Degree Measures, and Random Selection Assumption.

Authors:  Jianghong Li; Thomas W Valente; Hee-Sung Shin; Margaret Weeks; Alexei Zelenev; Gayatri Moothi; Heather Mosher; Robert Heimer; Eduardo Robles; Greg Palmer; Chinekwu Obidoa
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-07

4.  Respondent driven sampling is an effective method for engaging methamphetamine users in HIV prevention research in South Africa.

Authors:  Stephen M Kimani; Melissa H Watt; M Giovanna Merli; Donald Skinner; Bronwyn Myers; Desiree Pieterse; Jessica C MacFarlane; Christina S Meade
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Sampling Migrants from their Social Networks: The Demography and Social Organization of Chinese Migrants in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  M Giovanna Merli; Ashton Verdery; Ted Mouw; Jing Li
Journal:  Migr Stud       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

7.  HIV Prevalence and Associated Risks in a Respondent-Driven Sample of Illicit Stimulant Users in a Southern United States City.

Authors:  Christina S Meade; Sheri L Towe; Yunan Xu; Crissi Rainer
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-08

8.  Diagnostics for Respondent-driven Sampling.

Authors:  Krista J Gile; Lisa G Johnston; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  NEW SURVEY QUESTIONS AND ESTIMATORS FOR NETWORK CLUSTERING WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Jacob C Fisher; Nalyn Siripong; Kahina Abdesselam; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2017-07-06

10.  One-step estimation of networked population size: Respondent-driven capture-recapture with anonymity.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Hsuan-Wei Lee; Ian Fellows; Kirk Dombrowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.