Literature DB >> 24158183

Femoral suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: do adjustable loops lengthen?

Aaron E Barrow1, Marcello Pilia, Teja Guda, Warren R Kadrmas, Travis C Burns.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cortical suspension devices are commonly used for femoral graft fixation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery. Adjustable-length fixation devices provide technical advantages over fixed-length loops but may be more susceptible to lengthening during cyclic loading. HYPOTHESIS: Both fixed-length and adjustable-length femoral cortical suspension devices would withstand ultimate loads greater than those normally experienced by the native ACL and would prevent clinically significant lengthening during prolonged cyclic loading. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Mechanical testing was performed on 3 ACL graft cortical suspensory devices by use of an extended cyclic loading (4500 cycles at 10-250 N) and pull-to-failure protocol. Two adjustable-length devices were additionally tested with the free suture ends tied.
RESULTS: Total displacement after 4500 cycles of tensioning at variable loads (expressed as mean ± SD) was 42.45 mm (±7.01 mm) for the Arthrex TightRope RT, 5.76 mm (±0.35 mm) for the Biomet ToggleLoc, and 1.34 mm (±0.03 mm) for the Smith & Nephew EndoButton CL Ultra (P < .001). The Arthrex TightRope reached clinical failure of 3 mm lengthening after fewer cycles (1349 ± 316) than the Biomet ToggleLoc (2576 ± 73) (P < .001). The Smith & Nephew EndoButton did not reach clinical failure during cyclic testing. With the free suture ends tied, after 4500 cycles, the Arthrex TightRope had a significant decrease in lengthening to 13.36 ± 1.86 mm (P < .037) There was also a significant difference in ultimate load between the TightRope (809.11 ± 52.94 N) and the other 2 constructs (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: The ultimate load of all graft-fixation devices exceeded the forces likely to be experienced in a patient's knee during the early postoperative rehabilitation period. However, the adjustable-length fixation devices experienced a clinically significant increase in loop lengthening during cyclic testing. This lengthening is partially caused by suture slippage into the adjustable-length loop. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adjustable-length ACL graft cortical suspension devices lengthen under cyclic loads because free suture ends are pulled into the adjustable loop. This may allow for graft-fixation device lengthening during the acute postoperative period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; EndoButton; TightRope; ToggleLoc; cortical button; cortical suspension; cyclic loading; soft tissue graft

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24158183     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513507769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  46 in total

1.  Femoral tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using RigidFix compared with extracortical fixation.

Authors:  Osmar Valadao Lopes; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli; Luiz Henrique Cunha Leite; Bruce Quatrin Buzzeto; Paulo Renato Fernades Saggin; André Kuhn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Preparation techniques for all-inside ACL cortical button grafts: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Raul Mayr; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Martin Eichinger; Vinzenz Smekal; Werner Schmoelz; René Attal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A comparison of three adjustable cortical button ACL fixation devices.

Authors:  Meghan Pasquali; Matthew J Plante; Keith O Monchik; David B Spenciner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Authors:  Alexander J Connaughton; Andrew G Geeslin; Christopher W Uggen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-19

5.  Adjustable buttons for ACL graft cortical fixation partially fail with cyclic loading and unloading.

Authors:  J Glasbrenner; C Domnick; M J Raschke; T Willinghöfer; C Kittl; P Michel; D Wähnert; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A comparison of four tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Mark Bowen; Guillaume Odry; Michel Collette; Xavier Cassard; Hubert Lanternier; Thierry De Polignac
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-10

7.  Adjustable loop ACL suspension devices demonstrate less reliability in terms of reproducibility and irreversible displacement.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Michael T Hirschmann; Benjamin Voumard; Sandro Kohl; Philippe Zysset; Takura Mukabeta; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Atesch Ateschrang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Biomechanical comparisons of current suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Cheng Jin; Siddhartha Venkata Paluvadi; SungJae Lee; SeungJin Yoo; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Study Between Adjustable and Fixed Length Suspension Devices.

Authors:  Bastian Uribe-Echevarria; Justin A Magnuson; Annunziato Amendola; Matthew J Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

10.  Cortical femoral suspensory fixation using screw post in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study and mid-term outcome results.

Authors:  Ashraf Abdelkafy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.