BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics is an important requirement towards the vision of evidence-based health informatics. The STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in health informatics, published in 2009, provides guidelines on the elements to be contained in an evaluation study report. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate on and provide a rationale for the principles of STARE-HI and to guide authors and readers of evaluation studies in health informatics by providing explanatory examples of reporting. METHODS: A group of methodologists, researchers and editors prepared the present elaboration of the STARE-HI statement and selected examples from the literature. RESULTS: The 35 STARE-HI items to be addressed in evaluation papers describing health informatics interventions are discussed one by one and each is extended with examples and elaborations. CONCLUSION: The STARE-HI statement and this elaboration document should be helpful resources to improve reporting of both quantitative and qualitative evaluation studies. Evaluation manuscripts adhering to the principles will enable readers of such papers to better place the studies in a proper context and judge their validity and generalizability, and thus in turn optimize the exploitation of the evidence contained therein. LIMITATIONS: This paper is based on experiences of a group of editors, reviewers, authors of systematic reviews and readers of the scientific literature. The applicability of the details of these principles has to evolve as a function of their use in practice.
BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics is an important requirement towards the vision of evidence-based health informatics. The STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in health informatics, published in 2009, provides guidelines on the elements to be contained in an evaluation study report. OBJECTIVES: To elaborate on and provide a rationale for the principles of STARE-HI and to guide authors and readers of evaluation studies in health informatics by providing explanatory examples of reporting. METHODS: A group of methodologists, researchers and editors prepared the present elaboration of the STARE-HI statement and selected examples from the literature. RESULTS: The 35 STARE-HI items to be addressed in evaluation papers describing health informatics interventions are discussed one by one and each is extended with examples and elaborations. CONCLUSION: The STARE-HI statement and this elaboration document should be helpful resources to improve reporting of both quantitative and qualitative evaluation studies. Evaluation manuscripts adhering to the principles will enable readers of such papers to better place the studies in a proper context and judge their validity and generalizability, and thus in turn optimize the exploitation of the evidence contained therein. LIMITATIONS: This paper is based on experiences of a group of editors, reviewers, authors of systematic reviews and readers of the scientific literature. The applicability of the details of these principles has to evolve as a function of their use in practice.
Keywords:
Evaluation studie; guidelines; health information systems; informatics
Authors: Tejal K Gandhi; Saul N Weingart; Andrew C Seger; Joshua Borus; Elisabeth Burdick; Eric G Poon; Lucian L Leape; David W Bates Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andre W Kushniruk; Marc M Triola; Elizabeth M Borycki; Ben Stein; Joseph L Kannry Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2005-04-08 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Jaap L van den Brink; Peter W Moorman; Maarten F de Boer; Jean F A Pruyn; Carel D A Verwoerd; Jan H van Bemmel Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P J Scott; M Rigby; E Ammenwerth; J Brender McNair; A Georgiou; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; F Magrabi; P Nykänen; W T Gude; W Hackl Journal: Yearb Med Inform Date: 2017-09-11
Authors: F Magrabi; E Ammenwerth; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; P Nykänen; M Rigby; P Scott; J Talmon; A Georgiou Journal: Yearb Med Inform Date: 2016-11-10
Authors: Frédérique Thonon; Swati Perrot; Abhijna Vithal Yergolkar; Olivia Rousset-Torrente; James W Griffith; Olivier Chassany; Martin Duracinsky Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stijn Van de Velde; Ilkka Kunnamo; Pavel Roshanov; Tiina Kortteisto; Bert Aertgeerts; Per Olav Vandvik; Signe Flottorp Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Philip J Scott; Angela W Brown; Taiwo Adedeji; Jeremy C Wyatt; Andrew Georgiou; Eric L Eisenstein; Charles P Friedman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Margie E Snyder; Heather Jaynes; Stephanie A Gernant; Julie DiIulio; Laura G Militello; William R Doucette; Omolola A Adeoye; Alissa L Russ Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 2.796