Literature DB >> 24155788

STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics: explanation and elaboration.

J Brender1, J Talmon, N de Keizer, P Nykänen, M Rigby, E Ammenwerth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics is an important requirement towards the vision of evidence-based health informatics. The STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in health informatics, published in 2009, provides guidelines on the elements to be contained in an evaluation study report.
OBJECTIVES: To elaborate on and provide a rationale for the principles of STARE-HI and to guide authors and readers of evaluation studies in health informatics by providing explanatory examples of reporting.
METHODS: A group of methodologists, researchers and editors prepared the present elaboration of the STARE-HI statement and selected examples from the literature.
RESULTS: The 35 STARE-HI items to be addressed in evaluation papers describing health informatics interventions are discussed one by one and each is extended with examples and elaborations.
CONCLUSION: The STARE-HI statement and this elaboration document should be helpful resources to improve reporting of both quantitative and qualitative evaluation studies. Evaluation manuscripts adhering to the principles will enable readers of such papers to better place the studies in a proper context and judge their validity and generalizability, and thus in turn optimize the exploitation of the evidence contained therein. LIMITATIONS: This paper is based on experiences of a group of editors, reviewers, authors of systematic reviews and readers of the scientific literature. The applicability of the details of these principles has to evolve as a function of their use in practice.

Keywords:  Evaluation studie; guidelines; health information systems; informatics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24155788      PMCID: PMC3799207          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-04-RA-0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  35 in total

1.  Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Marc Berg; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Jytte Brender; Pirkko Nykänen; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Michael Rigby; Jan Talmon
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing.

Authors:  Tejal K Gandhi; Saul N Weingart; Andrew C Seger; Joshua Borus; Elisabeth Burdick; Eric G Poon; Lucian L Leape; David W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application.

Authors:  Andre W Kushniruk; Marc M Triola; Elizabeth M Borycki; Ben Stein; Joseph L Kannry
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 5.  Toward an evaluation of an integrated clinical imaging system: identifying clinical benefits.

Authors:  B Kaplan; H P Lundsgaarde
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers.

Authors:  J Ash
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Involving the patient: a prospective study on use, appreciation and effectiveness of an information system in head and neck cancer care.

Authors:  Jaap L van den Brink; Peter W Moorman; Maarten F de Boer; Jean F A Pruyn; Carel D A Verwoerd; Jan H van Bemmel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Guided prescription of psychotropic medications for geriatric inpatients.

Authors:  Josh F Peterson; Gilad J Kuperman; Caroline Shek; Minalkumar Patel; Jerry Avorn; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-11

9.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit.

Authors:  Amy L Potts; Frederick E Barr; David F Gregory; Lorianne Wright; Neal R Patel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluation Considerations for Secondary Uses of Clinical Data: Principles for an Evidence-based Approach to Policy and Implementation of Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  P J Scott; M Rigby; E Ammenwerth; J Brender McNair; A Georgiou; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; F Magrabi; P Nykänen; W T Gude; W Hackl
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 2.  Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.

Authors:  F Magrabi; E Ammenwerth; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; P Nykänen; M Rigby; P Scott; J Talmon; A Georgiou
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 3.  Electronic Tools to Bridge the Language Gap in Health Care for People Who Have Migrated: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Frédérique Thonon; Swati Perrot; Abhijna Vithal Yergolkar; Olivia Rousset-Torrente; James W Griffith; Olivier Chassany; Martin Duracinsky
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  What's Past is Prologue: A Scoping Review of Recent Public Health and Global Health Informatics Literature.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Jamie Pina; Hadi Kharrazi; Fardad Gharghabi; Janise Richards
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 5.  Key influences in the design and implementation of mental health information systems in Ghana and South Africa.

Authors:  S Ahuja; T Mirzoev; C Lund; A Ofori-Atta; S Skeen; A Kufuor
Journal:  Glob Ment Health (Camb)       Date:  2016-04-08

6.  Does health informatics have a replication crisis?

Authors:  Enrico Coiera; Elske Ammenwerth; Andrew Georgiou; Farah Magrabi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The GUIDES checklist: development of a tool to improve the successful use of guideline-based computerised clinical decision support.

Authors:  Stijn Van de Velde; Ilkka Kunnamo; Pavel Roshanov; Tiina Kortteisto; Bert Aertgeerts; Per Olav Vandvik; Signe Flottorp
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  A review of measurement practice in studies of clinical decision support systems 1998-2017.

Authors:  Philip J Scott; Angela W Brown; Taiwo Adedeji; Jeremy C Wyatt; Andrew Georgiou; Eric L Eisenstein; Charles P Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Alerts for community pharmacist-provided medication therapy management: recommendations from a heuristic evaluation.

Authors:  Margie E Snyder; Heather Jaynes; Stephanie A Gernant; Julie DiIulio; Laura G Militello; William R Doucette; Omolola A Adeoye; Alissa L Russ
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Bridging the Gap Between Academic Research and Pragmatic Needs in Usability: A Hybrid Approach to Usability Evaluation of Health Care Information Systems.

Authors:  Devin M Mann; Sara Kuppin Chokshi; Andre Kushniruk
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2018-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.