QUESTIONS: Does chemotherapy-that is, gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus docetaxel, doxorubicin, or trabectedin-improve clinical outcomes in women with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma (lms)? Is there a difference in the tumour response rate to chemotherapy between recurrent pelvic disease and extrapelvic metastases in the target patients? METHODS: This guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, the Sarcoma Disease Site Group (dsg), and the Gynecologic Cancer dsg. The core methodology was the systematic review. The medline and embase databases (2004 to June 2011), the Cochrane Library, main guideline Web sites, and relevant annual meeting abstracts (2005-2010) were searched. Internal and external reviews were conducted, with final approval by the dsgs and the Program in Evidence-Based Care. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Based on currently available evidence from the medical literature (four single-arm phase ii studies, one arm of a randomized controlled trial, and one abstract), doxorubicin alone, gemcitabine alone, or gemcitabine plus docetaxel may be treatment options in first- or second-line therapy (or both) for women with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic uterine lms. Hematologic toxicity is common and should be monitored, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor should be considered when gemcitabine plus docetaxel is used. Other toxicities, such as neurotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and cardiovascular toxicity should be monitored. No recommendation is made for or against the use of trabectedin in the targeted patients. No data were available concerning differences in response in recurrent pelvic disease or extrapelvic metastases, or concerning quality of life.
QUESTIONS: Does chemotherapy-that is, gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus docetaxel, doxorubicin, or trabectedin-improve clinical outcomes in women with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma (lms)? Is there a difference in the tumour response rate to chemotherapy between recurrent pelvic disease and extrapelvic metastases in the target patients? METHODS: This guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, the Sarcoma Disease Site Group (dsg), and the Gynecologic Cancer dsg. The core methodology was the systematic review. The medline and embase databases (2004 to June 2011), the Cochrane Library, main guideline Web sites, and relevant annual meeting abstracts (2005-2010) were searched. Internal and external reviews were conducted, with final approval by the dsgs and the Program in Evidence-Based Care. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: Based on currently available evidence from the medical literature (four single-arm phase ii studies, one arm of a randomized controlled trial, and one abstract), doxorubicin alone, gemcitabine alone, or gemcitabine plus docetaxel may be treatment options in first- or second-line therapy (or both) for women with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic uterine lms. Hematologic toxicity is common and should be monitored, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor should be considered when gemcitabine plus docetaxel is used. Other toxicities, such as neurotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and cardiovascular toxicity should be monitored. No recommendation is made for or against the use of trabectedin in the targeted patients. No data were available concerning differences in response in recurrent pelvic disease or extrapelvic metastases, or concerning quality of life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemotherapy; clinical practice guideline; uterine leiomyosarcoma
Authors: G P Browman; M N Levine; E A Mohide; R S Hayward; K I Pritchard; A Gafni; A Laupacis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martee L Hensley; John A Blessing; Koen Degeest; Ovadia Abulafia; Peter G Rose; Howard D Homesley Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Martee L Hensley; Robert Maki; E Venkatraman; Gennifer Geller; Meghan Lovegren; Carol Aghajanian; Paul Sabbatini; William Tong; Richard Barakat; David R Spriggs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carmel Jacobs; Ian D Graham; Julie Makarski; Michaël Chassé; Dean Fergusson; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Edwin Choy; Karla Ballman; James Chen; Mark A Dickson; Rashmi Chugh; Suzanne George; Scott Okuno; Raphael Pollock; Rajiv M Patel; Antje Hoering; Shreyaskumar Patel Journal: Sarcoma Date: 2018-10-24
Authors: Yael Babichev; Leah Kabaroff; Alessandro Datti; David Uehling; Methvin Isaac; Rima Al-Awar; Michael Prakesch; Ren X Sun; Paul C Boutros; Rosemarie Venier; Brendan C Dickson; Rebecca A Gladdy Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Kelly Aubertin; Amanda K A Silva; Nathalie Luciani; Ana Espinosa; Aurélie Djemat; Dominique Charue; François Gallet; Olivier Blanc-Brude; Claire Wilhelm Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 4.379