OBJECTIVE: Doxorubicin-based treatment is standard therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. There is no standard second-line therapy. We determined activity of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line treatment for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. METHODS: Eligible women with unresectable uterine leiomyosarcoma progressing after prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) days one and eight over 90 min, plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 8 of a 21-day cycle with granulocyte growth factor. Patients with prior pelvic radiation received lower doses. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response was assessed by computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: Forty-eight of 51 women were evaluable for response (one wrong histology, two never treated). Prior therapy was doxorubicin-based in 90%, and ifosfamide-based in 6%. The overall objective response rate is 27%, with complete response in 6.3% (3/48), and partial response in 20.8% (10/48). An additional 50% (24/48) had stable disease (median duration 5.4 months). The median number of cycles per patient was 5.5 (range 1-22); 73% of patients remained progression-free at 12 weeks and 52% at 24 weeks. The predominant toxicity was uncomplicated myelosuppression: thrombocytopenia grade 3 (29%), grade 4 (10.4%); neutropenia grade 3 (12.5%), grade 4 (8.3%) anemia grade 3 (20.8%), grade 4 (4.2%). While pulmonary toxicity was reported, no patient had drug-related pneumonitis/hypoxia-type toxicity. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6+ months (range 0.7-27+ months). The median duration of objective response was 9+ months (range 3.9-24.5+ months). CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel is active second-line therapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
OBJECTIVE:Doxorubicin-based treatment is standard therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. There is no standard second-line therapy. We determined activity of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line treatment for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. METHODS: Eligible women with unresectable uterine leiomyosarcoma progressing after prior cytotoxic therapy were treated with gemcitabine 900 mg/m(2) days one and eight over 90 min, plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 8 of a 21-day cycle with granulocyte growth factor. Patients with prior pelvic radiation received lower doses. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) response was assessed by computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: Forty-eight of 51 women were evaluable for response (one wrong histology, two never treated). Prior therapy was doxorubicin-based in 90%, and ifosfamide-based in 6%. The overall objective response rate is 27%, with complete response in 6.3% (3/48), and partial response in 20.8% (10/48). An additional 50% (24/48) had stable disease (median duration 5.4 months). The median number of cycles per patient was 5.5 (range 1-22); 73% of patients remained progression-free at 12 weeks and 52% at 24 weeks. The predominant toxicity was uncomplicated myelosuppression: thrombocytopenia grade 3 (29%), grade 4 (10.4%); neutropenia grade 3 (12.5%), grade 4 (8.3%) anemia grade 3 (20.8%), grade 4 (4.2%). While pulmonary toxicity was reported, no patient had drug-related pneumonitis/hypoxia-type toxicity. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6+ months (range 0.7-27+ months). The median duration of objective response was 9+ months (range 3.9-24.5+ months). CONCLUSION: Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel is active second-line therapy for uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Authors: Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martee L Hensley; Robert Maki; E Venkatraman; Gennifer Geller; Meghan Lovegren; Carol Aghajanian; Paul Sabbatini; William Tong; Richard Barakat; David R Spriggs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert G Maki; J Kyle Wathen; Shreyaskumar R Patel; Dennis A Priebat; Scott H Okuno; Brian Samuels; Michael Fanucchi; David C Harmon; Scott M Schuetze; Denise Reinke; Peter F Thall; Robert S Benjamin; Laurence H Baker; Martee L Hensley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Weiwei Shan; Patricia Y Akinfenwa; Kari B Savannah; Nonna Kolomeyevskaya; Rudolfo Laucirica; Dafydd G Thomas; Kunle Odunsi; Chad J Creighton; Dina C Lev; Matthew L Anderson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Oliver Zivanovic; Lindsay M Jacks; Alexia Iasonos; Mario M Leitao; Robert A Soslow; Emanuela Veras; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Murray F Brennan; Martee L Hensley Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David M Hyman; Michael W Sill; Heather A Lankes; Richard Piekarz; Mark S Shahin; Mildred R Ridgway; Floor Backes; Meaghen E Tenney; Cara A Mathews; James S Hoffman; Carol Aghajanian; Martee L Hensley Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Linda R Duska; John A Blessing; Jacob Rotmensch; Robert S Mannel; Parviz Hanjani; Peter G Rose; Don S Dizon Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Martee L Hensley; Danielle Enserro; Helen Hatcher; Petronella B Ottevanger; Anders Krarup-Hansen; Jean-Yves Blay; Cyril Fisher; Katherine M Moxley; Shashikant B Lele; Jayanthi S Lea; Krishnansu S Tewari; Premal H Thaker; Oliver Zivanovic; David M O'Malley; Katina Robison; David S Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544