Literature DB >> 7844612

The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.

G P Browman1, M N Levine, E A Mohide, R S Hayward, K I Pritchard, A Gafni, A Laupacis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a conceptual tool for the systematic development of cancer treatment practice guidelines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The guidelines development tool, the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle, was derived from observing an evidence-based practice guidelines initiative at a comprehensive cancer center in Ontario, Canada, and from a literature review that uncovered barriers to guidelines development and implementation. Based on the literature findings and direct observations of how clinicians struggled with evidence-based guidelines development, we evolved a framework to incorporate clinical and administrative factors (eg, costs) into evidence-based guidelines. Use of the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle is illustrated with a clinical example (the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in good-risk, node-negative premenopausal breast cancer patients).
RESULTS: The result is the Practice Guidelines Development Cycle, which consists of eight sequential steps, from topic selection to policy formulation. Independent validation of guidelines is included. The cycle products are the evidence-based recommendation, the practice guideline, and the practice policy. The main features of the cycle are emphasis on scientific evidence, acknowledgment of the roles of clinical experience and nonclinical (administrative) factors through consensus, and explicit separation of clinical and cost considerations in guidelines development. Twenty guidelines are currently in development.
CONCLUSION: Attention to the barriers of guidelines development and the sociocultural nature of clinical practice, and respect for clinical experience, can lead to improved strategies for guidelines development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7844612     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.2.502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  136 in total

1.  Shared decision making in a publicly funded health care system. Policies exist to reduce the risk of conflict between individual and society.

Authors:  M J Sculpher; I Watt; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  The importance of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the quality and development of supportive care in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries.

Authors:  Snezana Bosnjak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Knowledge translation in audiology: promoting the clinical application of best evidence.

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Anita Kothari; Marlene P Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Linda T Miller; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

4.  Invasive mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  G E Darling; A J Dickie; R A Malthaner; E B Kennedy; R Tey
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Patterns of care in community-based oncology practices for anemia associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arash Naeim; Lyssa Friedman; Kimberly B Whitlock; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Hema N Viswanathan; John Glaspy
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Safe handling of parenteral cytotoxics: recommendations for ontario.

Authors:  Esther Green; Mary Johnston; Maureen Trudeau; Lisa Schwartz; Susan Poirier; Gail Macartney; Deborah Milliken
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 8.  Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Audrey Jusko Friedman; Roxanne Cosby; Susan Boyko; Jane Hatton-Bauer; Gale Turnbull
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  The organization of colposcopy services in Ontario: recommended framework.

Authors:  J Murphy; N P Varela; L Elit; A Lytwyn; M Yudin; M Shier; V Wu; S El-Khatib
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?

Authors:  G Pentheroudakis; R Stahel; H Hansen; N Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.