Literature DB >> 17209732

The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise.

Jan W Brascamp1, Raymond van Ee, André J Noest, Richard H A H Jacobs, Albert V van den Berg.   

Abstract

When our two eyes view incongruent images, we experience binocular rivalry: An ongoing cycle of dominance periods of either image and transition periods when both are visible. Two key forces underlying this process are adaptation of and inhibition between the images' neural representations. Models based on these factors meet the constraints posed by data on dominance periods, but these are not very stringent. We extensively studied contrast dependence of dominance and transition durations and that of the occurrence of return transitions: Occasions when an eye loses and regains dominance without intervening dominance of the other eye. We found that dominance durations and the incidence of return transitions depend similarly on contrast; transition durations show a different dependence. Regarding dominance durations, we show that the widely accepted rule known as Levelt's second proposition is only valid in a limited contrast range; outside this range, the opposite of the proposition is true. Our data refute current models, based solely on adaptation and inhibition, as these cannot explain the long and reversible transitions that we find. These features indicate that noise is a crucial force in rivalry, frequently dominating the deterministic forces.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209732     DOI: 10.1167/6.11.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  78 in total

1.  Mechanisms for Frequency Control in Neuronal Competition Models.

Authors:  Rodica Curtu; Asya Shpiro; Nava Rubin; John Rinzel
Journal:  SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Dynamical characteristics common to neuronal competition models.

Authors:  Asya Shpiro; Rodica Curtu; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Binocular rivalry transitions predict inattention symptom severity in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Natalia Zaretskaya; Nina Maria Höhnle; Andreas Bartels; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Brascamp; Joel Pearson; Raymond van Ee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The influence of chromatic context on binocular color rivalry: perception and neural representation.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on initial ocular following responses.

Authors:  Mingxia Zhu; Richard W Hertle; Chang H Kim; Xuefeng Shi; Dongsheng Yang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Suppression during binocular rivalry broadens orientation tuning.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.