| Literature DB >> 24152930 |
Florian Stelzle1, Christian Knipfer, Werner Adler, Maximilian Rohde, Nicolai Oetter, Emeka Nkenke, Michael Schmidt, Katja Tangermann-Gerk.
Abstract
Laser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrected (raw) autofluorescence spectra for the development of a remote feedback control system for tissue-selective laser surgery. Autofluorescence spectra (excitation wavelength 377 ± 50 nm) were measured from nine different ex vivo tissue types, obtained from 15 domestic pig cadavers. For data analysis, a wavelength range between 450 nm and 650 nm was investigated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were used to discriminate the tissue types. ROC analysis showed that PCA, followed by QDA, could differentiate all investigated tissue types with AUC results between 1.00 and 0.97. Sensitivity reached values between 93% and 100% and specificity values between 94% and 100%. This ex vivo study shows a high differentiation potential for physiological tissue types when performing autofluorescence spectroscopy followed by PCA and QDA. The uncorrected autofluorescence spectra are suitable for reliable tissue discrimination and have a high potential to meet the challenges necessary for an optical feedback system for tissue-specific laser surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24152930 PMCID: PMC3859088 DOI: 10.3390/s131013717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Number of measurements.
| 9 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 12,150 |
Figure 1.Schematics of the experimental setup.
Figure 2.Autofluorescence spectra (averaged over 900 measurements per tissue type), excitation wavelength: 377 ± 50 nm).
Figure 3.Averaged loadings of the principal components PC1–PC5 determined in 15 cross-validation runs.
Confusion matrix (total error 5.20%).
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancellous bone | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |
| Cartilage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | |
| Cortical bone | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 | |
| Fat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 37 | 42 | 1 | 0 | |
| Mucosa | 0 | 73 | 1 | 6 | 44 | 3 | 53 | 0 | |
| Muscle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Nerve | 0 | 0 | 25 | 81 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Salivary gland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 11 | 0 | 0 | |
| Skin | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||
| 0.999 | 0.944 | 0.981 | 0.929 | 0.921 | 0.909 | 0.967 | 0.914 | 0.967 | |
Areas under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC).
| Cartilage | 1.00 | |||||||
| Cortical bone | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Fat | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Mucosa | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Muscle | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | |||
| Nerve | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Salivary gland | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Skin | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Sensitivity.
| Cartilage | 1.00 | |||||||
| Cortical bone | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Fat | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Mucosa | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | ||||
| Muscle | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 | |||
| Nerve | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.99 | ||
| Salivary gland | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Skin | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Specificity.
| Cartilage | 1.00 | |||||||
| Cortical bone | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Fat | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Mucosa | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 0.99 | ||||
| Muscle | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Nerve | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | ||
| Salivary gland | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |
| Skin | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |